Literature DB >> 28984705

The crashing patient: hemodynamic collapse.

Hitesh Gidwani1, Hernando Gómez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rapid restoration of tissue perfusion and oxygenation are the main goals in the resuscitation of a patient with circulatory collapse. This review will focus on providing an evidence based framework of the technological and conceptual advances in the evaluation and management of the patient with cardiovascular collapse. RECENT
FINDINGS: The initial approach to the patient in cardiovascular collapse continues to be based on the Ventilate-Infuse-Pump rule. Point of care ultrasound is the preferred modality for the initial evaluation of undifferentiated shock, providing information to narrow the differential diagnosis, to assess fluid responsiveness and to evaluate the response to therapy. After the initial phase of resuscitative fluid administration, which focuses on re-establishing a mean arterial pressure to 65 mmHg, the use of dynamic parameters to assess preload responsiveness such as the passive leg raise test, stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation and collapsibility of the inferior vena cava in mechanically ventilated patients is recommended.
SUMMARY: The crashing patient remains a clinical challenge. Using an integrated approach with bedside ultrasound, dynamic parameters for the evaluation of fluid responsiveness and surrogates of evaluation of tissue perfusion have made the assessment of the patient in shock faster, safer and more physiologic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28984705      PMCID: PMC5668154          DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN: 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


  54 in total

1.  Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury.

Authors:  Herbert P Wiedemann; Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; Douglas Hayden; Ben deBoisblanc; Alfred F Connors; R Duncan Hite; Andrea L Harabin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Lactate and microcirculation as suitable targets for hemodynamic optimization in resuscitation of circulatory shock.

Authors:  Michael E Kiyatkin; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 3.  A systematic review of vasopressor blood pressure targets in critically ill adults with hypotension.

Authors:  Mathieu Hylands; Morten Hylander Moller; Pierre Asfar; Augustin Toma; Anne Julie Frenette; Nicolas Beaudoin; Émilie Belley-Côté; Frédérick D'Aragon; Jon Henrik Laake; Reed Alexander Siemieniuk; Emmanuel Charbonney; François Lauzier; Joey Kwong; Bram Rochwerg; Per Olav Vandvik; Gordon Guyatt; François Lamontagne
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST): results from an international consensus conference.

Authors:  T M Scalea; A Rodriguez; W C Chiu; F D Brenneman; W F Fallon; K Kato; M G McKenney; M L Nerlich; M G Ochsner; H Yoshii
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-03

5.  Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Patrick Biston; Jacques Devriendt; Christian Madl; Didier Chochrad; Cesar Aldecoa; Alexandre Brasseur; Pierre Defrance; Philippe Gottignies; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care.

Authors:  John A Myburgh; Simon Finfer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Laurent Billot; Alan Cass; David Gattas; Parisa Glass; Jeffrey Lipman; Bette Liu; Colin McArthur; Shay McGuinness; Dorrilyn Rajbhandari; Colman B Taylor; Steven A R Webb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Nor'azim Mohd Yunos; Rinaldo Bellomo; Colin Hegarty; David Story; Lisa Ho; Michael Bailey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The RUSH exam: Rapid Ultrasound in SHock in the evaluation of the critically lll.

Authors:  Phillips Perera; Thomas Mailhot; David Riley; Diku Mandavia
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients.

Authors:  Christophe Barbier; Yann Loubières; Christophe Schmit; Jan Hayon; Jean-Louis Ricôme; François Jardin; Antoine Vieillard-Baron
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Hypovolemic and hemorrhagic shock].

Authors:  H Lier; M Bernhard; B Hossfeld
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.041

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.