Literature DB >> 28984301

Are the uterine serous carcinomas underdiagnosed? Histomorphologic and immunohistochemical correlates and clinical follow up in high-grade endometrial carcinomas initially diagnosed as high-grade endometrioid carcinoma.

Shaomin Hu1, Jeff L Hinson2, Rahul Matnani2, Michael L Cibull2, Rouzan G Karabakhtsian1,2.   

Abstract

Histologic subclassification of high-grade endometrial carcinomas can sometimes be a diagnostic challenge when based on histomorphology alone. Here we utilized immunohistochemical markers to determine the immunophenotype in histologically ambiguous high-grade endometrial carcinomas that were initially diagnosed as pure or mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma, aiming to determine the utility of selected immunohistochemical panel in accurate classification of these distinct tumor types, while correlating these findings with the clinical outcome. A total of 43 high-grade endometrial carcinoma cases initially classified as pure high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (n=32), mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma/serous carcinoma (n=9) and mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma/clear cell carcinoma (n=2) were retrospectively stained with a panel of immunostains, including antibodies for p53, p16, estrogen receptor, and mammaglobin. Clinical follow-up data were obtained, and stage-to-stage disease outcomes were compared for different tumor types. Based on aberrant staining for p53 and p16, 17/43 (40%) of the high-grade endometrial carcinoma cases initially diagnosed as high-grade endometrioid carcinoma were re-classified as serous carcinoma. All 17 cases showed negative staining for mammaglobin, while estrogen receptor was positive in only 6 (35%) cases. The remaining 26 cases of high-grade endometrioid carcinoma showed wild-type staining for p53 in 25 (96%) cases, patchy staining for p16 in 20 (77%) cases, and were positive for mammaglobin and estrogen receptor in 8 (31%) and 19 (73%) cases, respectively, thus the initial diagnosis of high-grade endometrioid carcinoma was confirmed in these cases. In addition, the patients with re-classified serous carcinoma had advanced clinical stages at diagnosis and poorer overall survival on clinical follow-up compared to that of the remaining 26 high-grade endometrioid carcinoma cases. These results indicate that selected immunohistochemical panel, including p53, p16, and mammaglobin can be helpful in reaching accurate diagnosis in cases of histomorphologically ambiguous endometrial carcinomas, and can assist in providing guidance for appropriate therapeutic options for the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28984301     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  37 in total

1.  Immunohistochemical Profiling of Endometrial Serous Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wenqian Chen; Arjumand Husain; Gregg S Nelson; Peter F Rambau; Shuhong Liu; Cheng-Han Lee; Sandra Lee; Máire A Duggan; Martin Köbel
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Interobserver Agreement in Endometrial Carcinoma Histotype Diagnosis Varies Depending on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-based Molecular Subgroup.

Authors:  Lien N Hoang; Mary A Kinloch; Joyce M Leo; Katherine Grondin; Cheng-Han Lee; Carol Ewanowich; Martin Köbel; Angela Cheng; Aline Talhouk; Melissa McConechy; David G Huntsman; Jessica N McAlpine; Robert A Soslow; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Poor interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of high-grade endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  C Blake Gilks; Esther Oliva; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Utility of p16 expression for distinction of uterine serous carcinomas from endometrial endometrioid and endocervical adenocarcinomas: immunohistochemical analysis of 201 cases.

Authors:  Anna Yemelyanova; Hongxiu Ji; Ie-Ming Shih; Tian-Li Wang; Lee-Shu-Fune Wu; Brigitte M Ronnett
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Mammaglobin expression in the female genital tract: immunohistochemical analysis in benign and neoplastic endocervix and endometrium.

Authors:  Kazuya Onuma; David J Dabbs; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.762

6.  Interobserver Variability in the Diagnosis of Uterine High-Grade Endometrioid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Sumi Thomas; Yaser Hussein; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Michele Cote; Oudai Hassan; Eman Abdulfatah; Baraa Alosh; Hui Guan; Robert A Soslow; Rouba Ali-Fehmi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Trends in demographic and clinical characteristics in women diagnosed with corpus cancer and their potential impact on the increasing number of deaths.

Authors:  Stefanie M Ueda; Daniel S Kapp; Michael K Cheung; Jacob Y Shin; Kathryn Osann; Amreen Husain; Nelson N Teng; Jonathan S Berek; John K Chan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Update on pathology, staging and molecular pathology of endometrial (uterine corpus) adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Joanne K L Rutgers
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.404

9.  Expression and mutation analysis of the p53 gene in uterine papillary serous carcinoma.

Authors:  S A King; A A Adas; V A LiVolsi; H Takahashi; K Behbakht; P McGovern; I Benjamin; S C Rubin; J Boyd
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers.

Authors:  C A Hamilton; M K Cheung; K Osann; L Chen; N N Teng; T A Longacre; M A Powell; M R Hendrickson; D S Kapp; J K Chan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  A "Null" Pattern of p16 Immunostaining in Endometrial Serous Carcinoma: An Under-recognized and Important Aberrant Staining Pattern.

Authors:  Daniel R Matson; Molly A Accola; Les Henderson; Xiangqiang Shao; Leah Frater-Rubsam; Vanessa L Horner; William M Rehrauer; Paul Weisman; Jin Xu
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.326

2.  A 4-gene signature predicts prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Lingjun Li; Ping Qin; Hanzhen Xiong; Ruichao Chen; Minfen Zhang; Qingping Jiang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Low Expression of miR-375 and miR-190b Differentiates Grade 3 Patients with Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Miłosz Pietrus; Michał Seweryn; Przemysław Kapusta; Paweł Wołkow; Kazimierz Pityński; Gracjan Wątor
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-02-13

4.  Endometrial Tumor Classification by Histomorphology and Biomarkers in the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Jaclyn C Watkins; Michael J Downing; Marta Crous-Bou; Evan L Busch; Maxine Chen; Immaculata De Vivo; George L Mutter
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2021-03-12

5.  Impact of endometrial carcinoma histotype on the prognostic value of the TCGA molecular subgroups.

Authors:  Antonio Travaglino; Antonio Raffone; Cristina Stradella; Rosanna Esposito; Paola Moretta; Cinzia Gallo; Giuliana Orlandi; Luigi Insabato; Fulvio Zullo
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.344

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.