Sarah C Castle1,2, Benjamin W Sullivan3, Joseph Knelman4, Eran Hood5, Diana R Nemergut6, Steven K Schmidt7, Cory C Cleveland8. 1. Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA. sccastle@umn.edu. 2. Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, 495 Borlaug, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA. sccastle@umn.edu. 3. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, USA. 4. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA. 5. Environmental Science Program, University of Alaska Southeast, Juneau, AK, 99801, USA. 6. Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. 7. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA. 8. Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
Abstract
A dominant paradigm in ecology is that plants are limited by nitrogen (N) during primary succession. Whether generalizable patterns of nutrient limitation are also applicable to metabolically and phylogenetically diverse soil microbial communities, however, is not well understood. We investigated if measures of N and phosphorus (P) pools inform our understanding of the nutrient(s) most limiting to soil microbial community activities during primary succession. We evaluated soil biogeochemical properties and microbial processes using two complementary methodological approaches-a nutrient addition microcosm experiment and extracellular enzyme assays-to assess microbial nutrient limitation across three actively retreating glacial chronosequences. Microbial respiratory responses in the microcosm experiment provided evidence for N, P and N/P co-limitation at Easton Glacier, Washington, USA, Puca Glacier, Peru, and Mendenhall Glacier, Alaska, USA, respectively, and patterns of nutrient limitation generally reflected site-level differences in soil nutrient availability. The activities of three key extracellular enzymes known to vary with soil N and P availability developed in broadly similar ways among sites, increasing with succession and consistently correlating with changes in soil total N pools. Together, our findings demonstrate that during the earliest stages of soil development, microbial nutrient limitation and activity generally reflect soil nutrient supply, a result that is broadly consistent with biogeochemical theory.
A dominant paradigm in ecology is that plants are limited by n class="Chemical">nitrogen (N) durinpan>g primary successionpan>. Whether generalizable patterns of nutrient limitationpan> are also applicable to metabolically and phylogenetically diverse soil microbial communpan>ities, however, is not well unpan>derstood. We inpan>vestigated if measures of N and n class="Chemical">phosphorus (P) pools inform our understanding of the nutrient(s) most limiting to soil microbial community activities during primary succession. We evaluated soil biogeochemical properties and microbial processes using two complementary methodological approaches-a nutrient addition microcosm experiment and extracellular enzyme assays-to assess microbial nutrient limitation across three actively retreating glacial chronosequences. Microbial respiratory responses in the microcosm experiment provided evidence for N, P and N/P co-limitation at Easton Glacier, Washington, USA, Puca Glacier, Peru, and Mendenhall Glacier, Alaska, USA, respectively, and patterns of nutrient limitation generally reflected site-level differences in soil nutrient availability. The activities of three key extracellular enzymes known to vary with soil N and P availability developed in broadly similar ways among sites, increasing with succession and consistently correlating with changes in soil total N pools. Together, our findings demonstrate that during the earliest stages of soil development, microbial nutrient limitation and activity generally reflect soil nutrient supply, a result that is broadly consistent with biogeochemical theory.
Authors: David A Wardle; Richard D Bardgett; John N Klironomos; Heikki Setälä; Wim H van der Putten; Diana H Wall Journal: Science Date: 2004-06-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Richard D Bardgett; Andreas Richter; Roland Bol; Mark H Garnett; Rupert Bäumler; Xinliang Xu; Elisa Lopez-Capel; David A C Manning; Phil J Hobbs; Ian R Hartley; Wolfgang Wanek Journal: Biol Lett Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 3.703
Authors: Robert L Sinsabaugh; Christian L Lauber; Michael N Weintraub; Bony Ahmed; Steven D Allison; Chelsea Crenshaw; Alexandra R Contosta; Daniela Cusack; Serita Frey; Marcy E Gallo; Tracy B Gartner; Sarah E Hobbie; Keri Holland; Bonnie L Keeler; Jennifer S Powers; Martina Stursova; Cristina Takacs-Vesbach; Mark P Waldrop; Matthew D Wallenstein; Donald R Zak; Lydia H Zeglin Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2008-09-25 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: Sarah R Sattin; Cory C Cleveland; Eran Hood; Sasha C Reed; Andrew J King; Steven K Schmidt; Michael S Robeson; Nataly Ascarrunz; Diana R Nemergut Journal: J Microbiol Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 3.422
Authors: Jonathan W Leff; Stuart E Jones; Suzanne M Prober; Albert Barberán; Elizabeth T Borer; Jennifer L Firn; W Stanley Harpole; Sarah E Hobbie; Kirsten S Hofmockel; Johannes M H Knops; Rebecca L McCulley; Kimberly La Pierre; Anita C Risch; Eric W Seabloom; Martin Schütz; Christopher Steenbock; Carly J Stevens; Noah Fierer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Joseph E Knelman; Emily B Graham; Janet S Prevéy; Michael S Robeson; Patrick Kelly; Eran Hood; Steve K Schmidt Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: John L Darcy; Steven K Schmidt; Joey E Knelman; Cory C Cleveland; Sarah C Castle; Diana R Nemergut Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 14.136