Literature DB >> 28983289

Dietary Heme Induces Gut Dysbiosis, Aggravates Colitis, and Potentiates the Development of Adenomas in Mice.

Marco Constante1,2, Gabriela Fragoso2, Annie Calvé2, Macha Samba-Mondonga2, Manuela M Santos1,2.   

Abstract

Dietary heme can be used by colonic bacteria equipped with heme-uptake systems as a growth factor and thereby impact on the microbial community structure. The impact of heme on the gut microbiota composition may be particularly pertinent in chronic inflammation such as in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), where a strong association with gut dysbiosis has been consistently reported. In this study we investigated the influence of dietary heme on the gut microbiota and inferred metagenomic composition, and on chemically induced colitis and colitis-associated adenoma development in mice. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we found that mice fed a diet supplemented with heme significantly altered their microbiota composition, characterized by a decrease in α-diversity, a reduction of Firmicutes and an increase of Proteobacteria, particularly Enterobacteriaceae. These changes were similar to shifts seen in dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-treated mice to induce colitis. In addition, dietary heme, but not systemically delivered heme, contributed to the exacerbation of DSS-induced colitis and facilitated adenoma formation in the azoxymethane/DSS colorectal cancer (CRC) mouse model. Using inferred metagenomics, we found that the microbiota alterations elicited by dietary heme resulted in non-beneficial functional shifts, which were also characteristic of DSS-induced colitis. Furthermore, a reduction in fecal butyrate levels was found in mice fed the heme supplemented diet compared to mice fed the control diet. Iron metabolism genes known to contribute to heme release from red blood cells, heme uptake, and heme exporter proteins, were significantly enriched, indicating a shift toward favoring the growth of bacteria able to uptake heme and protect against its toxicity. In conclusion, our data suggest that luminal heme, originating from dietary components or gastrointestinal bleeding in IBD and, to lesser extent in CRC, directly contributes to microbiota dysbiosis. Thus, luminal heme levels may further exacerbate colitis through the modulation of the gut microbiota and its metagenomic functional composition. Our data may have implications in the development of novel targets for therapeutic approaches aimed at lowering gastrointestinal heme levels through heme chelation or degradation using probiotics and nutritional interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenomas; colitis; colorectal cancer (CRC); heme; inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); iron; microbiota; red meat

Year:  2017        PMID: 28983289      PMCID: PMC5613120          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Availability of nutrients within the gut is a major driver of the microbial community structure (Kamada et al., 2013). One such nutrient is iron. In the gut, bacterial survival strongly depends on their ability to capture iron (Weinberg, 2009). For many bacterial pathogens, iron is often the limiting factor for colonization and infection (Becker and Skaar, 2014). Bacterial iron-management strategies, including iron uptake mechanisms, can occupy a large fraction of the bacterial genome (Andrews et al., 2003). Bacterial iron acquisition systems include direct contact between the bacterium and exogenous iron sources as well as more sophisticated systems that rely on molecules synthesized and released by bacteria into the extracellular medium to scavenge iron or heme from various sources. These include high-affinity iron-siderophore and heme acquisition systems, which enable bacteria to compete for iron (Wandersman and Delepelaire, 2004). As such, intestinal luminal iron availability is highly dependent on dietary components and/or iron supplementation and holds the potential to directly affect microbial composition. Previously, we have shown that in mice, iron differentially altered the gut microbiota composition depending on the iron formulation (ferrous sulfate, ferrous bisglycinate, and ferric ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) that was present in the diet (Constante et al., 2017). However, in addition to capturing non-heme iron, many bacteria are also proficient at capturing heme iron. Bacterial heme acquisition systems are comprised of a series of proteins to sense and signal the up-regulation of the heme transport proteins, bind heme with high affinity, and translocate heme into the cytoplasm (Tong and Guo, 2009). Bacteria have diverse heme transport systems that include direct uptake of heme or heme proteins (e.g., hemopexin, hemoglobin, hemoglobin–haptoglobin), hemophore-mediated heme uptake, or bipartite heme receptors consisting of a two-protein system (Tong and Guo, 2009). Bacterial pathogens are particularly efficient at capturing heme and at thriving in heme-rich environments (Cescau et al., 2007; Reniere et al., 2007; Wilks and Burkhard, 2007; Tong and Guo, 2009). Heme iron levels in the luminal gut is likely to profoundly impact on the microbial community structure. The impact of heme on the gut microbiota composition may be particularly relevant in chronic inflammation, such as found in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) comprising ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). During inflammation, the host responds by sequestering iron in a process that has been coined as “nutritional immunity” (Weinberg, 1977; Diaz-Ochoa et al., 2014). This process increases competition for iron and favors the growth of bacteria that are better equipped to acquire iron from diverse sources. In fact, gut dysbiosis has been consistently reported in IBD patients (Manichanh et al., 2006; Scanlan et al., 2006; Frank et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 2008; Walters et al., 2014; Winter and Baumler, 2014). Inflammatory bowel disease patients are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) (Kim and Chang, 2014). Epidemiological studies have shown that CRC has a strong association with meat consumption in the Western diet (Armstrong and Doll, 1975; Sinha et al., 2009; De Stefani et al., 2012) that manifests in a dose-dependent manner (Sandhu et al., 2001; Norat et al., 2002; Larsson and Wolk, 2006). This association is further reinforced by the fact that the incidence of CRC is rapidly increasing in developing countries adopting Western-style diets (Kim et al., 2013). In UC patients, ingestion of heme-rich red meat increases the likelihood of flare relapse (Jowett et al., 2004). In this study, we investigated the influence of dietary heme on the microbiota and inferred gut metagenome functional composition, as well as its impact on colitis and colitis-associated adenoma development in mice.

Materials and Methods

Animals

C57BL/6 mice were bred and maintained under standard 12:12 h light/dark conditions at the Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM) and were co-caged at four to five mice per cage. All procedures were performed in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines after approval by the Institutional Animal Care Committee of the CRCHUM.

Diets

To study the impact of diets on microbiota, mice were fed ad libitum a control diet containing 50 mg/kg of iron in the form of iron sulfate (Teklad TD.120515) or a heme-supplemented diet with 50 mg/kg iron in the form of hemin (Teklad TD.120516) for 4 weeks. For the chronic azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) experiments for adenoma formation, mice were fed a control (TD.140855) diet or a diet supplemented with 25 mg/kg of iron in the form of heme (TD.140856). Diet compositions are detailed in Supplementary Table .

Animal Treatments

Dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced acute colitis: Colitis was induced by administering DSS (0.75% w/v of 40 000 molecular weight DSS; TdB Consultancy AB, Uppsala, Sweden) in drinking water to 20–25 g female mice for 10 days (Chassaing et al., 2014). Mice received ad libitum a control diet containing 50 mg/kg of iron in the form of iron sulfate (Teklad TD.120515; Envigo, Indianapolis, IN, United States) or hemin (Teklad TD.120516) starting 1 week before a cycle of 10 days of DSS. Alternatively, mice were fed ad libitum the control diet containing 50 mg/kg of iron in the form of iron sulfate (Teklad TD.120515) starting 1 week before DSS-treatment. For intraperitoneal hemin administration, we used the same method as reported by Zhang L. et al., 2014. Hemin was dissolved in 0.2 mol/l NaOH, titrated to pH 7.4 with HCl, and then diluted with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Mice were intraperitoneally administered vehicle or 75 μmol/kg of hemin (Sigma-Aldrich) 2 days before DSS-treatment. Azoxymethane (AOM)/DSS model: Colitis-associated adenoma formation was induced by intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg of AOM in 20–25 g female mice (De Robertis et al., 2011) that received ad libitum a control diet or a diet supplemented with 25 mg/kg of iron in the form of heme starting 2 weeks before AOM injection. Three days after AOM injection, mice were subjected to three cycles of 2% DSS for 5 days, followed by a recovery period of 14 days. After the third cycle, the drinking water was administered without DSS for four additional weeks.

Histological Scoring

Colon paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, then subjected to blind analysis and scored. Inflammation score: presence of occasional inflammatory cells in the lamina propria (assigned a value of 0); increased numbers of inflammatory cells in the lamina propria (value of 1); confluence of inflammatory cells, extending into the submucosa (value of 2); and transmural extension of the infiltrate (value of 3) (Jia et al., 2008). Tissue damage score: no mucosal damage (value of 0); lymphoepithelial lesions (value of 1); surface mucosal erosion or focal ulceration (value of 2); extensive mucosal damage; and extension into deeper structure (value of 3) (Jia et al., 2008).

Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA from homogenized colonic tissue samples was isolated using TRIZOL (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON, Canada). To avoid inhibition by DSS of downstream reactions, we further purified the mRNA using a second clean-up with the Qiagen mRNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Using this clean up we do not find differences in β-actin mRNA levels between the DSS-containing samples and non-DSS-containing controls. Reverse transcription was performed with the Thermoscript RT-PCR System (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON, Canada). Lcn2, β-actin, and interleukin-6 (Il-6) mRNA levels were measured by real-time PCR in a Rotor Gene 3000 Real Time DNA Detection System (Montreal Biotech, Kirkland, QC, Canada) with QuantiTect SYBRGreen I PCR Kits (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON, Canada) as described (Huang et al., 2009; Layoun and Santos, 2012). The following primers used were: β-actin, 5′-TGTTACCAACTGGGACGACA-3′ and 5′-GGTGTTGAAGGTCTCAAA-3; Lcn2, 5′-CCCATCTCTGCTCACTGTCC-3′ and 5′-TTTTTCTGGACCGCATTG-3′; Il-6, 5′-TGTGCAATGGCAATTCTGAT-3′ and 5′-CCAGAGGAAATTTTCAATAGGC-3′. All primers were designed to include at least one intron to allow DNA contamination detection by melting curve analysis. Relative quantitation was performed using standard curves constructed from serial dilutions of PCR products as previously described (Makui et al., 2005). Expression levels were normalized to the housekeeping gene β-actin.

Heme Quantification

Heme from feces was assayed by fluorescence according to van den Berg et al. (1988). Briefly, colonic contents from mice were immediately snap-frozen and kept at -80°C until dilution in water 1:1 (w/w). Samples were homogenized, then centrifuged at 1 500 × g for 10 min. To 10 μl of the supernatant 200 μl of glacial acetic acid was added and mixed. Subsequently, 10 μl of freshly prepared aqueous solution of FeSO4.7H20 (0.12 mol/l) and HC1 (4.5 mol/l) was added. Samples were immediately incubated at 60°C for 30 min after which 50 μl of the sample was added to 100 μl of 1:1 2-propanol/water (v/v). Fluorescence was measured at excitation 400 nm and emission 594 nm.

Fecal Butyrate Quantification

Butyrate was measured at the CRCHUM Metabolomics core facility by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry using a protocol adapted from Han et al. (2015). Briefly, samples were homogenized in 50% aqueous acetonitrile containing 2,2-dimethylbutyric acid as internal standard. After centrifugation, water-soluble carbonyl groups found in supernatants were derivatized using 3-nitrophenylhydrazine to produce the corresponding phenylhydrazone derivatives. Derivatized short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were separated by high-performance liquid chromatography (Shimadzu Nexera X2 UHPLC System, Columbia, MA, United States) using a Poroshell 120 EC-C18, 2.1 × 75 mm, 2.7 μm particles column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States) coupled to a guard column, and a gradient mobile phase composed of formic acid in water (solvent A) and formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B). Detection was performed after electrospray ionization on a Sciex 6500 mass spectrometer operated in negative-ion mode.

DNA Extraction and Illumina MiSeq Sequencing

Total DNA was extracted from snap-frozen colonic content kept at -80°C with the Powersoil DNA Extraction Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, United States). The amplicon library preparation and sequencing for the stool microbiota analysis were performed by the Genome Quebec Innovation Center. Briefly, amplicon libraries were constructed with the bacterial/archeal PCR primers 347F and 803R, which target the V3-V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene. A second PCR was performed to attach sample barcodes and the adaptor sequences used by the Illumina sequencing systems. Samples were normalized based on Quant-iTTM PicoGreen® dsDNA Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Nepean, ON, Canada), pooled and purified with Agencourt AMPure beads (Beckman Coulter Canada Inc., Mississauga, ON, Canada). After quality check by DNA quantitation, real-time quantitative PCR, and microfluidic gel electrophoresis, the library was sequenced in the MiSeq system (Miseq v2 Reagent Kit, 500 cycles PE; Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States), spiked with 20% PhiX (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States).

Microbiota Analysis

Pre-processing of sequence reads: Forward and reverse 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from Illumina (available at the Sequence Read Archive SUB2963298) were aligned to each other using the Paired-End Read (PEAR) merger (Zhang J. et al., 2014). Clustering of reads into operational taxonomic units (OTUs): Using the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME; Caporaso et al., 2010) software, the merged sequences were aligned to the Greengenes database version 13.8 (i.e., “closed reference” approach to clustering) containing the sequences for OTUs devoid of chimeric sequences. We used the 97% similarity database to identify bacteria at the species level. OTUs were filtered to remove taxa present in only one sample and taxa with less than 100 reads across all samples. Samples were confirmed to have a minimum of 1000 reads each. α- and β-diversity analysis: The Shannon index of diversity was calculated using the R package vegan (Oksanen et al., 2015). To investigate the level of differences between experimental groups (β-diversity or how taxa are shared between groups), we performed Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) using the unweighted UniFrac distance (Lozupone and Knight, 2005), with the R package phyloseq (McMurdie and Holmes, 2012), and analysis of variance (ANOVA) using distance matrices (Adonis) using the R package vegan (Oksanen et al., 2015). Functional analysis: To infer sample metagenomes from the 16S rRNA gene analysis (i.e., infer the genes present in the microbiota population), we used the Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States tool (PICRUSt) (Langille et al., 2013) with the Greengenes version 13.5 precalculated files for the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) genes and pathways (Kanehisa and Goto, 2000). Since the Greengenes OTU database does not change from version 13.5 to 13.8, we used the results from the clustering described above. The PICRUSt results were then analyzed using linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) to identify microbial functions that were significantly different in their abundance between groups. FishTaco was used to link taxonomic and functional shifts in the microbiome (Manor and Borenstein, 2017). The R programming environment (R Core Team, 2015) was used to generate the graphical outputs.

Statistics

R (R Core Team, 2015) and Prism were used to perform the statistical analysis. Multiple comparisons were evaluated statistically by one-way ANOVA. Statistically significant differences were then evaluated by two-tailed Student’s t-test and multiple testing was corrected via false discovery rate (FDR) (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995) estimation.

Results

Dietary Heme Induces Dysbiosis Similar to That Found in DSS-Treated Mice

To investigate the effects of heme iron on gut microbiota composition, we analyzed microbiota in stool samples from mice fed a diet containing 50 ppm as iron-sulfate (control diet) or 50 ppm of iron as heme, and compared to mice fed with the control diet while subjected to DSS-induced colitis, which causes gastrointestinal bleeding. As shown in Figure , stool heme levels were increased in mice fed the heme-supplemented diet and in mice subjected to DSS. PCoA (Figure ) showed that mice fed the control diet clustered separately from mice fed the heme-supplemented diet, indicating that heme iron substantially altered the composition of the gut microbiota. When analyzing α-diversity for richness (Chao1), or for both evenness and richness (Shannon), DSS-treatment showed decreased microbial diversity (Figure ), as expected (Sartor, 2008; Manichanh et al., 2012). Notably, heme dietary supplementation also significantly decreased microbial diversity, albeit to a lesser extent than DSS-treatment (Figure ). Dietary heme induces gut dysbiosis similar to that found in DSS-treated mice. Mice were fed a control diet (CD) or a heme-supplemented diet (Heme) for 4 weeks, or were fed a control diet (CD) and received either water alone, or water with DSS (CD DSS) for 10 days (N = 8–10 mice per group). (A) Fecal heme. (B) principal coordinate analysis with plotting of Axis.1 only (upper part) or both Axis.1 and Axis.2 (lower part). (C) Shannon and Chao1 measurements of α-diversity. (D) Differential bacterial abundance analysis. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001. n.s., not significant. (A,B – upper part) Each box plot has a lower tail that extends from the minimum value to the 25th percentile; a central box that begins at the 25th percentile and ends at the 75th percentile, with a line demarcating the median; and an upper tail that extends to the maximum value. (C) Each symbol in both graphics represents one mouse and the line demarks the mean. Taxonomic composition analysis revealed that, at the phylum level, DSS-treatment resulted in increased abundance of Proteobacteria and reduction of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (Figure ). Most importantly, the changes in levels of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were reproduced in mice fed with the heme-supplemented diet (Figure ). Within the phylum Firmicutes, and at the species level, we found that mice fed the heme-supplemented diet had similar microbial shifts as DSS-treated mice, namely a marked decrease of unclassified (unc.) [Mogibacteriaceae], rc4-4 sp., unc. Clostridiaceae, unc. Clostridiales, SMB53 sp., Clostridium perfringens, and Blautia sp. (all from the class Clostridia), and Lactobacillus sp. (class Bacilli) (Figure ). In the phylum Bacteroidetes, two species were decreased in mice fed the heme-supplemented diet and in DSS-treated mice, namely unc. Rikenellaceae and unc. S24-7 (Figure ), whereas in the phylum Proteobacteria, unc. Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia coli levels increased (Figure ). Dietary heme results in shifts in important gut bacterial species that are also modulated in DSS-treated mice. Mice were fed a control diet (CD) or a heme-supplemented diet (Heme) for 4 weeks, or were fed a control diet (CD) and received either water alone, or water with DSS (CD DSS) for 10 days (N = 8–10 mice per group). ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001. n.s., not significant. Each symbol represents one mouse and the line demarks the mean. Thus, dietary heme iron induces mild dysbiosis with similar characteristics to the DSS-induced dysbiosis in mice.

Dietary Heme Aggravates DSS-Induced Colitis and Facilitates Adenoma Formation

Previous studies have reported that, when heme iron is administered systemically, it has a protective effect on DSS-induced colitis (Zhang L. et al., 2014), an effect opposite to the one expected based on the heme-induced microbiota changes shown in Figures , . Therefore, to further investigate the impact of heme iron on DSS-induced colitis, we compared colitis severity in mice fed with the diet supplemented with heme to mice fed with the control diet and receiving heme administered intraperitoneally to bypass the lumen of the gut. Compared with mice receiving the control diet, mice that received the heme-supplemented diet lost more body weight when treated with DSS (Figure ), had an increased inflammation (Figure ), and tissue damage scores (Figure ) as well as higher levels of the inflammatory markers lipocalin 2 (Lcn2) (Thorsvik et al., 2017; Figure ) and interleukin-6 (Il-6) (Figure ) in the gut. These changes were accompanied by an increase in Enterobacteriaceae levels (Figure ). In contrast, when compared to control mice receiving PBS, mice receiving heme intraperitoneally had a milder DSS-induced colitis as indicated by higher body weights (Figure ), as well as lower Lcn2 mRNA levels (Figure ) and reduced Enterobacteriaceae levels (Figure ), with the inflammation (Figure ) and tissue damage (Figure ) scores remaining unaffected. Dietary heme adversely impacts DSS-induced colitis and promotes adenoma formation. (A–F) Acute colitis: All mice received DSS in drinking water while fed a control diet (CD) versus a heme-supplemented diet (Heme) (clear bars; N = 7–10 mice per group) or were kept on the control diet and were injected with either phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) alone or heme solution intraperitoneally (Heme) (patterned bars; N = 13–15 mice). (A) Body weight change (final/initial body weight × 100). (B) Inflammation score. (C) Tissue damage score. (D) Colon lipocalin 2 (Lcn2) mRNA levels. (E) Colon interleukin-6 (Il-6) mRNA levels. (F) Enterobacteriaceae relative abundance. Red lines indicate values of mice that did not receive DSS. (G–I) Azoxymethane (AOM)/DSS adenoma formation: Mice were fed a control diet (CD) or heme-supplemented diet (Heme) (N = 10 mice per group). (G) Number of small (left) and large (right) adenomas per mouse. (H) Colon macroscopic appearance (white arrowheads – large adenomas). (I) Histological appearance of rolled colon (posterior side in the center – black arrowhead prominent adenoma). †P < 0.001 when compared with non-DSS treated mice. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗∗P < 0.001. n.s., not significant. (A,D–G) Each box plot has a lower tail that extends from the minimum value to the 25th percentile; a central box that begins at the 25th percentile and ends at the 75th percentile, with a line demarcating the median; and an upper tail that extends to the maximum value. (B,C) Bars represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The presence of inflammation in the gut for long periods of time augments the risk for the development of colon cancer (Ekbom et al., 1990; Schetter et al., 2009; Terzic et al., 2010).We next studied the impact of dietary heme in the AOM/DSS mouse model of carcinogenesis. Using this model, we found a higher number of large adenomas in the colons of mice fed the heme-supplemented diet compared to those fed with the control diet (Figure ), as analyzed macroscopically (Figure ). Histology analysis (Figure ) revealed the adenomatous nature of the polyps. Taken together, these results show that dietary heme, but not systemically administered heme, aggravates DSS-induced colitis and facilitates the growth of adenomas.

Inferred Functional Profile of Mice Fed a Heme-Supplemented Diet Replicates Metabolic Shifts Found in DSS-Treated Mice

Since we found that mice subjected to the heme-supplemented diet had dysbiosis, we next investigated whether the microbiota changes would result in alterations of bacterial metabolic pathways using PICRUSt to infer the metagenomes from the 16S rRNA gene analysis. Linear discriminative analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) plotted in a dendogram showed that heme- and DSS-treatments resulted in similar overall metabolic profile changes when each were individually compared to untreated mice fed the control diet (Figure ). The most marked changes in KEGG pathways were the increase in genes implicated in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism as well as cellular processes and signaling, and a decrease in energy, amino acid, and nucleotide metabolism genes as well as in the genes implicated in the metabolism of terpenoids, polyketides and cofactors, and vitamins. DSS and dietary heme induce similar modulation of the fecal metagenomic functional content. PICRUSt was used to predict the metagenome functional content of mice fed a control diet (CD) or a heme-supplemented diet (Heme) for 4 weeks (A), or of mice fed an CD and received water alone (CD) or water with DSS (CD DSS) for 10 days (B) (N = 8–10 mice). (A,B) Circular dendrograms represent the KEGG functional hierarchy. The outermost circles represent individual metabolic modules and the innermost circles represent very broad functional categories. Red and green coloration denotes modules showing significant differential abundances identified with LEfSe (P-value cut-off of 0.05 and LDA score cut-off of 2). Next, we further investigated KEGG metabolic pathways that have been reported to be specifically altered in IBD patients (Morgan et al., 2012). As shown in Figure , we found that heme-fed mice presented with a higher number of nitrogen and sulfur metabolism genes in regards to energy metabolism; an elevated number of riboflavin metabolism genes from the metabolism of cofactors and vitamins pathway; and a decrease in amino acid metabolism genes, namely cysteine and methionine metabolism and lysine biosynthesis. Bacterial secretion system genes related to the environmental information processing pathway remained unchanged. In the carbohydrate metabolism pathway, we found an increase in fructose and mannose metabolism and pentose phosphate pathway genes, whereas butanoate (or butyrate) metabolism genes were not affected. Although there were no significant differences in the whole butanoate metabolism pathways between mice fed the heme-supplemented diet and mice fed the control diet, we did find a significant decrease in the metagenomic presence of butyrate kinase, phosphate butyryltransferase, and the α-subunit of butyryl-CoA:acetate Co-A transferase (with an increase in the β-subunit) in mice receiving the heme-supplemented diet (Figure ). We further confirmed that dietary heme diminished butyrate production by directly quantifying butyrate in fecal samples (Figure ). Inferred metagenome functional content of heme-fed mice replicates metabolic shifts present in IBD patients. Mice were fed a control diet (CD) or a heme-supplemented diet (Heme) for 4 weeks, or were fed a control diet (CD) and received either water alone, or water with DSS (CD DSS) for 10 days (N = 8–10 mice per group). (A) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways reported to be altered in IBD (Morgan et al., 2012). (B) KEGG pathways implicated in colon health. (C) Butyrate quantification. ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001. n.s., not significant. (A,B) Each symbol represents one mouse and the line demarks the mean. (C) Bars represent mean ± SEM. Overall, these data show that dysbiosis induced by dietary heme is accompanied by several bacterial metabolic alterations. Next, to further understand how heme iron may affect bacterial iron-related pathways, we curated a list of iron-related genes through KEGG database and literature searches (Supplementary Table ), identifying 134 iron-related genes of which 120 were also present in the PICRUSt reference files. We then used FishTaco, a new framework for identifying taxonomic drivers of functional shifts in the microbiome (Manor and Borenstein, 2017), to investigate which bacterial species were responsible for the enrichment of identified iron-related genes triggered by dietary heme or DSS-induced colitis (Figures and Supplementary Figures , ). Among others, we found periplasmic TonB protein (heme uptake), a putative hemin transport protein (heme uptake), a hydroxymethylbilane synthase (heme synthesis), heme exporter protein A (heme export), iron complex outer membrane receptor protein (iron-siderophore uptake), and hemolysin III (implicated in red blood cell lysis) to be enriched in mice fed the heme supplemented diet as well as in DSS-treated mice, when compared to control mice receiving the control diet (Figures ). These shifts were mainly due to the presence of Bacteroides and unc. Enterobacteriaceae and the absence of unc. S27-7, unc. Rikenellaceae, and several Firmicutes in the mice fed the heme-supplemented diet and in DSS-treated mice. Many of the iron-related functional shifts were present in both mice fed the heme enriched diet and in DSS-treated mice (Supplementary Figures , ). Taxonomic contributors to iron metabolism genes determined by FishTaco. Mice were fed a control diet (CD) or a heme-supplemented diet (Heme) for 4 weeks, or were fed a control diet (CD) and received either water alone, or water with DSS for 10 days (CD DSS) (N = 8–10 mice per group). (A) Taxon-level shift contribution profiles for several genes enriched by both Heme- and DSS-treatments. (B) Legend common to all plots. (C) Example explanation of a FishTaco-based taxon-level contribution profile.

Discussion

Diet is a potent modulator of the microbial community in the gut with significant impacts on the bacterial population and microbiota health (Carmody et al., 2015). The Western diet is characterized by a high intake of fat and red meat (e.g., beef, lamb, pork) that is rich in heme. Fat has also been reported to contribute to colitis (Devkota et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2012; Gulhane et al., 2016) and colon tumor formation (Park et al., 2012). Previous studies have found that heme aggravates colitis when administered concomitantly with high fat levels (van der Logt et al., 2013), making it difficult to distinguish separate effects of heme and fat. In the present study, we show that dietary heme iron aggravates colitis and facilitates adenoma formation even when using a low-fat diet, further highlighting the importance of dietary heme in inflammation-related CRC development. Heme has been proposed to contribute to inflammation and carcinogenesis by inducing cytotoxicity that damages the colon surface epithelium, catalyzes lipid peroxidation reactions, and produces free radicals (Ishikawa et al., 2010; Schepens et al., 2011; Ijssennagger et al., 2013; van der Logt et al., 2013), all of which are inducers of cellular damage. Our study suggests a new mechanism by which dietary heme may contribute to CRC, namely by contributing to gut dysbiosis. Heightened CRC risk has been associated with non-beneficial changes in the gut microbiota composition (Gill and Rowland, 2002; Zhan et al., 2013), reflected by an imbalance between “harmful” (e.g., Escherichia) and “beneficial” (e.g., Lactobacillus) bacteria, which influence carcinogen bioactivation and cancer risk. Patients with adenomas, compared to healthy controls, present with decreased abundance of class Clostridia and [Mogibacteriaceae], Christensenellaceae, and Clostridiaceae families (Peters et al., 2016), which we also found decreased in the mice fed the heme-supplemented diet. Many species belonging to those taxa are important producers of butyrate (Pryde et al., 2002), a bacteria-produced metabolite with anti-inflammatory and anti-tumorigenic properties (Hague et al., 1995; Segain et al., 2000; Pryde et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2016). The decrease in butyrate producing taxa in mice fed a heme-supplemented diet was associated with reduced gene levels of butyrate production pathways (particularly the butyrate kinase/phosphate butyryltransferase pathway) and reduced stool butyrate levels. These findings suggest that one of the mechanisms by which heme aggravates colitis and facilitates adenoma formation is by inducing dysbiosis and consequently reducing colon butyrate levels. Our data are in agreement with previous work which used classical culturing methods and found that dietary heme increased Enterobacteriaceae and decreased Lactobacilli in rats (Schepens et al., 2011). Similarly, others found, using the Mouse Intestinal Tract Chip, that dietary heme increases the abundance of Proteobacteria and decreases Firmicutes (Ijssennagger et al., 2012). Importantly, a low-fat diet supplemented with heme, unlike non-heme iron formulations (Constante et al., 2017), is sufficient in replicating several aspects of the dysbiosis found in IBD patients (Manichanh et al., 2006; Scanlan et al., 2006; Frank et al., 2007; Peterson et al., 2008; Walters et al., 2014; Winter and Baumler, 2014) and in the DSS mouse model of colitis (Sartor, 2008; Manichanh et al., 2012). This includes a reduction of Firmicutes and an increase of Proteobacteria, particularly Enterobacteriaceae (a hallmark of dysbiosis in IBD; Winter and Baumler, 2014), and an overall reduction in α-diversity. In IBD, and to a lesser extent also in CRC, gastrointestinal bleeding can further contribute to elevate luminal heme levels. Our data suggest that high luminal heme levels ensuing from gastrointestinal blood losses in IBD and CRC patients may be an important contributor to gut dysbiosis. Heme-induced dysbiosis ultimately impacted butyrate metabolism where there are two pathways for conversion of butyrate-CoA into butyrate, a SCFA important for gut health that has been shown to have immunomodulatory properties (Inan et al., 2000; Saemann et al., 2000; Canani et al., 2011). One pathway involves a two-step reaction that uses the enzymes butyrate kinase and phosphate butyryltransferase, and the other pathway has a single-step reaction that is driven by butyryl-CoA:acetate Co-A transferase. The decrease in butyrate kinase, phosphate butyryltransferase, and the α subunit of butyryl-CoA:acetate Co-A transferase found in mice receiving the heme-supplemented diet likely contribute to the reduction in fecal butyrate levels. There are several non-exclusive mechanisms by which heme may modulate the gut microbiota and affect bacterial metabolism. For example, luminal heme levels may favor the growth of bacteria that are capable of efficiently acquiring iron from this source. Indeed, we find an enrichment in iron metabolism genes that contribute to heme release from red blood cells (e.g., hemolysin III; Chen et al., 2004) or are responsible for heme uptake (e.g., periplasmic TonB, putative hemin transport protein; Tong and Guo, 2009) in response to elevated dietary heme. Concomitantly, bacteria may be selected for their capacity to handle heme-induced cellular toxicity when intracellular heme reaches harmful levels through heme export, sequestration, and degradation strategies (Anzaldi and Skaar, 2010). Accordingly, we found an enrichment in heme exporter proteins in the gut of mice receiving the heme-supplemented diet (e.g., heme exporter A). Heme may additionally impact bacterial nutrient availability through its ability to reduce mucin levels (Ijssennagger et al., 2015), a source of amino acids for colon microbiota. This may explain the reduction in amino acid metabolism, including cysteine and methionine metabolism and lysine biosynthesis found in mice receiving the diet supplemented with heme. Finally, heme may exert a selective pressure through oxidative stress (Nath et al., 1998), resulting in the increase of the pentose phosphate pathway (which has NADPH as a product) and riboflavin metabolism genes, as both NADPH and riboflavin are important for pH and oxidative stress homeostasis (Morgan et al., 2012). Overall these data indicate that dietary heme and DSS-induced colitis exert similar selective pressures on the gut bacterial community in regards to heme and/or iron management.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that luminal heme, originating from dietary components or gastrointestinal bleeding directly contributes to microbiota dysbiosis found in DSS-induced colitis and in IBD patients, and may further exacerbate colitis through the modulation of the gut microbiota and its metagenomic functional composition (Figure ). If heme can also be demonstrated to produce similar shifts in gut microbiota composition in humans, heme chelation or degradation using probiotics could represent a new therapeutic approach to reverse dysbiosis and prevent CRC in at risk populations. Interactions between heme, the microbiota, and colitis/colorectal cancer (CRC). (A) Heme alters the microbiota and its metabolic pathways that are responsible for the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). (B) The microbiota plays a pivotal role in inflammation and cancer development through mechanisms that include the production of SCFAs. In turn, inflammation and CRC also shape the microbiota composition (Arthur et al., 2012; Kang and Martin, 2017). (C) Gastrointestinal bleeding in colitis and CRC contribute to rising luminal heme levels. In turn, heme may additionally aggravate colitis and CRC development through mechanisms independent of heme-induced microbiota changes such as the induction of cytotoxicity, catalysis of lipid peroxidation reactions, and production of free radicals (Ishikawa et al., 2010; Ijssennagger et al., 2013).

Author Contributions

MC contributed to the conception of the work, acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data, and drafted and reviewed the manuscript. GF, AC, and MS-M acquired and analyzed the data, and reviewed the manuscript. MS contributed to the conception of the work and interpreted the data, and drafted and reviewed the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  76 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Intracellular targets in heme protein-induced renal injury.

Authors:  K A Nath; J P Grande; A J Croatt; S Likely; R P Hebbel; H Enright
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 3.  Bacterial iron sources: from siderophores to hemophores.

Authors:  Cécile Wandersman; Philippe Delepelaire
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  Characterization and virulence of hemolysin III from Vibrio vulnificus.

Authors:  Yu-Chung Chen; Ming-Chung Chang; Yin-Ching Chuang; Chii-Ling Jeang
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Westernized high-fat diet accelerates weight loss in dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice, which is further aggravated by supplementation of heme.

Authors:  Elise M J van der Logt; Tjasso Blokzijl; Roelof van der Meer; Klaas Nico Faber; Gerard Dijkstra
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Reduced colitis-associated colon cancer in Fat-1 (n-3 fatty acid desaturase) transgenic mice.

Authors:  Qian Jia; Joanne R Lupton; Roger Smith; Brad R Weeks; Evelyn Callaway; Laurie A Davidson; Wooki Kim; Yang-Yi Fan; Peiying Yang; Robert A Newman; Jing X Kang; David N McMurray; Robert S Chapkin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice.

Authors:  Benoit Chassaing; Jesse D Aitken; Madhu Malleshappa; Matam Vijay-Kumar
Journal:  Curr Protoc Immunol       Date:  2014-02-04

8.  Dietary heme alters microbiota and mucosa of mouse colon without functional changes in host-microbe cross-talk.

Authors:  Noortje IJssennagger; Muriel Derrien; Gerdien M van Doorn; Anneke Rijnierse; Bartholomeus van den Bogert; Michael Müller; Jan Dekker; Michiel Kleerebezem; Roelof van der Meer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment.

Authors:  Xochitl C Morgan; Timothy L Tickle; Harry Sokol; Dirk Gevers; Kathryn L Devaney; Doyle V Ward; Joshua A Reyes; Samir A Shah; Neal LeLeiko; Scott B Snapper; Athos Bousvaros; Joshua Korzenik; Bruce E Sands; Ramnik J Xavier; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  The AOM/DSS murine model for the study of colon carcinogenesis: From pathways to diagnosis and therapy studies.

Authors:  Mariangela De Robertis; Emanuela Massi; Maria Luana Poeta; Simone Carotti; Sergio Morini; Loredana Cecchetelli; Emanuela Signori; Vito Michele Fazio
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2011-03-24
View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  How diet and the microbiome shape health or contribute to disease: A mini-review of current models and clinical studies.

Authors:  Megan T Zangara; Christine McDonald
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-01-31

Review 2.  The role of iron in host-microbiota crosstalk and its effects on systemic glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Jordi Mayneris-Perxachs; José María Moreno-Navarrete; José Manuel Fernández-Real
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 47.564

Review 3.  The Impact of Dietary Transition Metals on Host-Bacterial Interactions.

Authors:  Christopher A Lopez; Eric P Skaar
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 21.023

Review 4.  Nutraceuticals in colorectal cancer: A mechanistic approach.

Authors:  Marco Rossi; S E Y E D Sina Mirbagheri; Ali Keshavarzian; Faraz Bishehsari
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 5.  Gut Microbiota: Influence on Carcinogenesis and Modulation Strategies by Drug Delivery Systems to Improve Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Runqi Zhu; Tianqun Lang; Wenlu Yan; Xiao Zhu; Xin Huang; Qi Yin; Yaping Li
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 6.  Psoriasis and Gut Microbiome-Current State of Art.

Authors:  Karina Polak; Beata Bergler-Czop; Michał Szczepanek; Kamila Wojciechowska; Aleksandra Frątczak; Norbert Kiss
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Long-term dietary patterns are associated with pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory features of the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Laura A Bolte; Arnau Vich Vila; Floris Imhann; Valerie Collij; Ranko Gacesa; Vera Peters; Cisca Wijmenga; Alexander Kurilshikov; Marjo J E Campmans-Kuijpers; Jingyuan Fu; Gerard Dijkstra; Alexandra Zhernakova; Rinse K Weersma
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Leveraging diet to engineer the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Mathis Wolter; Erica T Grant; Marie Boudaud; Alex Steimle; Gabriel V Pereira; Eric C Martens; Mahesh S Desai
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  16S rRNA and metagenomic shotgun sequencing data revealed consistent patterns of gut microbiome signature in pediatric ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Wenxuan Zuo; Beibei Wang; Xin Bai; Yihui Luan; Yingying Fan; Sonia Michail; Fengzhu Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  The interaction of Hemin and Sestrin2 modulates oxidative stress and colon tumor growth.

Authors:  Hyeoncheol Kim; Kunlun Yin; Daniel M Falcon; Xiang Xue
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.