Literature DB >> 28983228

Descriptive Rules for Achalasia of the Esophagus, June 2012: 4th Edition.

.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28983228      PMCID: PMC5603650          DOI: 10.1007/s10388-017-0589-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Esophagus        ISSN: 1612-9059            Impact factor:   4.230


× No keyword cloud information.
Review Committee for Descriptive Rules for Achalasia of the Esophagus President Hisahiro Matsubara Former President Nobutoshi Ando English Edition Committee, Chairman Nobuo Omura Adviser Hideyuki Kashiwagi English Edition Committee Members Surgery Surgery Surgery Internal Medicine Internal Medicine Internal Medicine Pathology Pathology Japanese Edition Committee, Chairman Hideyuki Kashiwagi Contents Descriptive Rules for Achalasia of the Esophagus Achalasia of the Esophagus Definition Symptoms Diagnosis Diagnostic features on esophagography Diagnostic features on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Diagnostic features on esophageal manometry Classification Radiographic images of the esophagus Endoscopy Esophageal manometry Histopathology Treatment Pharmacotherapy Endoscopic treatment Surgical treatment Other Esophageal Motility Disorders Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) Nutcracker esophagus Hypertensive LES Non-specific esophageal motility disorder (NEMD) Esophageal motility dysfunctions complicating other diseases Pseudoachalasia I Achalasia of the esophagus 1. Definition Achalasia of the esophagus is an esophageal motility disorder of unknown etiology, characterized by failure of relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and impaired peristaltic movement of the lower esophageal body. 2. Symptoms Symptoms include dysphagia, regurgitation of ingested food into the oral cavity, chest pain, weight loss, and nocturnal cough. 3. Diagnosis Useful diagnostic modalities for this disorder include: (1) esophagography; (2) upper gastrointestinal endoscopy; (3) esophageal manometry; (4) histopathologic examination of the esophageal muscle layers (in patients undergoing surgery). 3.1 Diagnostic features on esophagography Dilatation/tortuosity of the esophagus Retained food in the esophagus and poor emptying of barium Smooth conical narrowing of the esophagogastric junction (bird-beak sign) Absence or diminution of gastric air bubbles Abnormal esophageal motility 3.2 Diagnostic features on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Dilatation of the esophageal lumen Abnormal retention of food and/or liquid remnants in the esophagus Whitish change and thickening of the esophageal mucosal surface Functional stenosis of the esophagogastric junction (endoscope passes through the stenotic segment although the esophagogastric junction fails to be dilated by insufflation; the procedure may involve winding of tissue around the scope or leafing of tissue on scope rotation) Abnormal contraction waves of the esophagus 3.3 Diagnostic features on esophageal manometry Deglutitive dysrelaxation of the LES* Disappearance of primary peristaltic waves* Increased esophageal static pressure (higher than the intragastric pressure) Increased LES pressure Occurrence of simultaneous contraction waves *Principal finding 4. Classification 4.1 Radiographic images of the esophagus X-ray examination: a dorsoventral view is obtained with the patient in the standing position; the patient is asked to swallow a barium meal, consisting of 100 mL of 100% barium sulfate, as quickly as possible, so that radiograms can be obtained within 1 min of the swallowing. No spasmolytic agent is used. Morphologic type This classification is based on the radiographic features of the esophagus. This classification, subclassified into the spindle type, flask type and sigmoid type according to the conventional descriptive rules, has been extensively used over decades. However, there are no distinct pathophysiological differences between the spindle type and the flask type, and no distinction is made between these two types in the United States or Europe. As for the sigmoid type, the extent of deviation and tortuosity of the upper esophagus may also have an impact on the therapeutic outcome. Therefore, achalasia is classified into the following two types in this version of the descriptive rules. Straight (St) type (Fig. 1)
Fig. 1

Straight (St) type

Straight (St) type Modest degree of tortuosity of the longitudinal axis of the esophagus. This type includes the conventional spindle type and flask type mentioned above. Sigmoid (Sg) type (Fig. 2)
Fig. 2

Sigmoid (Sg) type

Sigmoid (Sg) type Significant degree of tortuosity of the longitudinal axis of the esophagus. Pronounced rightward tortuosity of the esophagus, causing the organ to assume an L-shaped course, is specifically termed the advanced sigmoid (aSg) type (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Advanced sigmoid (aSg) type

Advanced sigmoid (aSg) type Addendum: The St type, Sg type, and aSg type are illustrated in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

Distinction among the St, Sg, and aSg types

Distinction among the St, Sg, and aSg types In cases where esophageal flexion(s) is noted, a straight line should be drawn in the direction of the esophageal long axis. In case two straight lines are drawn, a single angle will be formed by the crossing straight lines; in case three straight lines are drawn, two angles will be formed by the crossing straight lines. The following definitions are framed in order of increasing angle, α, formed by the crossing straight lines. When α ≥ 135°, the disorder is diagnosed as the St type. When 90° ≤ α < 135°, the disorder is diagnosed as the Sg type. When α < 90°, the disorder is diagnosed as the aSg type. The angle(s) should be stated without fail. Dilatation grading (Fig. 5)
Fig. 5

Dilatation grading. Grade I d < 3.5 cm, Grade II 3.5 ≤ d < 6.0 cm, Grade III 6.0 cm ≤ d

Dilatation grading. Grade I d < 3.5 cm, Grade II 3.5 ≤ d < 6.0 cm, Grade III 6.0 cm ≤ d The dilatation is classified into Grades I to III according to the maximum transverse diameter (d) of the esophagus drawn perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis. Grade I d < 3.5 cm Grade II 3.5 ≤ d < 6.0 cm Grade III 6.0 cm ≤ d Addenda: Tortuosity of the upper thoracic esophagus (Fig. 6)
Fig. 6

Tortuosity of the upper thoracic esophagus

Tortuosity of the upper thoracic esophagus Leftward-tortuous esophagus (Fig. 7)
Fig. 7

Leftward tortuosity of the esophagus

Leftward tortuosity of the esophagus Concurrent epiphrenic diverticulum (pulsion diverticulum) (Fig. 8)
Fig. 8

Concurrent epiphrenic diverticulum

Concurrent epiphrenic diverticulum Concurrent carcinoma of the esophagus (location, size, and depth of invasion should be stated) 4.2 Endoscopy (Fig. 9)
Fig. 9

Endoscopic images. Normal type (a), retained type (b), dilated type (c), and dilated-retained type (d)

Endoscopic images. Normal type (a), retained type (b), dilated type (c), and dilated-retained type (d) Achalasia of the esophagus is classified into the following four types according to the endoscopic findings. Normal type: there is no obvious retention of ingested food or dilatation of the esophagus. Retained type: retention of ingested food or fluid in the esophagus, but no apparent dilatation. Dilated type: dilatation of the esophagus is evident, but no retained ingested food is seen in the esophagus. Retained-dilated type: the esophagus is dilated with retained ingested food. Reference findings suggestive of achalasia (Fig. 10)
Fig. 10

Endoscopic images of the cardiac portion of the esophagus. Healthy subject (a) and a patient with achalasia (b)

Endoscopic images of the cardiac portion of the esophagus. Healthy subject (a) and a patient with achalasia (b) In healthy subjects who inspire deeply, the lower esophagus usually opens, and an entire view of the esophageal palisade vessels becomes visible. However, in patients with achalasia, an entire view of the esophageal palisade vessels does not become visible and, in addition, rosette-like esophageal folds appear in the lower esophagus [1]. 4.3 Esophageal manometry Achalasia of the esophagus is classified into the following two types according to the findings on esophageal manometry. Complete type Impaired relaxation of the LES and the absence of esophageal peristalsis in response to swallowing. Incomplete type Not meeting the above criteria. Esophageal high-resolution manometry findings of primary peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation after water swallowing in healthy subject. a Manometric instrument: Trace! (Dr. G.S. Hebbard, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia). b Manometric instrument: ManoScan 360™ (Sierra Scientific Instruments Inc.) Esophageal high-resolution manometry findings in a patient with achalasia. Manometric instrument: Trace! (Dr. G.S. Hebbard, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia) Esophageal manometric findings in healthy subjects (Fig. 11a, b)
Fig. 11

Esophageal high-resolution manometry findings of primary peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation after water swallowing in healthy subject. a Manometric instrument: Trace! (Dr. G.S. Hebbard, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia). b Manometric instrument: ManoScan 360™ (Sierra Scientific Instruments Inc.)

Esophageal manometric findings in patients with achalasia (Fig. 12, b)
Fig. 12

Esophageal high-resolution manometry findings in a patient with achalasia. Manometric instrument: Trace! (Dr. G.S. Hebbard, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia)

Impaired relaxation of the LES Absence of esophageal peristalsis Addendum: i) Vigorous achalasia [2] (Fig. 13a, b)
Fig. 13

Esophageal manometry findings in a patient with vigorous-type achalasia. Manometric instrument: ManoScan 360™ (Sierra Scientific Instruments Inc.). a Conventional method. b Esophageal high-resolution manometry

Esophageal manometry findings in a patient with vigorous-type achalasia. Manometric instrument: ManoScan 360™ (Sierra Scientific Instruments Inc.). a Conventional method. b Esophageal high-resolution manometry In addition to the above diagnostic criteria, when amplitude of the lower esophagus is ≥37 (30 to 40) mmHg, this condition is defined as vigorous achalasia, and when amplitude of the lower esophagus is <37 (30 to 40) mmHg, it is termed classic achalasia. 4.4 Histopathology (Figs. 14, 15)
Fig. 14

Histopathologic photomicrographs (Grade II). a Lymphocyte accumulation in Auerbach’s plexus between the hypertrophic inner circular and outer longitudinal muscle layers. b Close-up view of a. Prominent lymphocyte infiltration and fibrosis are evident in Auerbach’s plexus. There is an evident decrease in the number of neuroganglion cells and degeneration of neuroganglion cells

Fig. 15

Histopathologic photomicrographs (Grade III). a A smaller Auerbach’s plexus is evident in the hypertrophic inner circular and outer longitudinal layers of the tunica muscularis propria. b Close-up view of a. Fibrosis is evident in Auerbach’s plexus. Loss of neuroganglion cells and the nerve fiber network is observed

Histopathologic photomicrographs (Grade II). a Lymphocyte accumulation in Auerbach’s plexus between the hypertrophic inner circular and outer longitudinal muscle layers. b Close-up view of a. Prominent lymphocyte infiltration and fibrosis are evident in Auerbach’s plexus. There is an evident decrease in the number of neuroganglion cells and degeneration of neuroganglion cells Histopathologic photomicrographs (Grade III). a A smaller Auerbach’s plexus is evident in the hypertrophic inner circular and outer longitudinal layers of the tunica muscularis propria. b Close-up view of a. Fibrosis is evident in Auerbach’s plexus. Loss of neuroganglion cells and the nerve fiber network is observed It is advisable for evaluation of the esophageal muscularis propria to be performed both on specimens from the dilated segment and narrowed segment. The tissue sampling sites must be stated. Achalasia of the esophagus is classified under the following three categories according to the ganglion cell/nerve fiber status observed on histopathology. Grade I: practically normal ganglion cells and nerve fibers. Grade II: diminution and degeneration of ganglion cells and nerve fibers. Grade III: loss of ganglion cells and nerve fibers. Addendum: note if there is any lymphocytic infiltration, etc. 5. Treatment 5.1 Pharmacotherapy [3-10] Calcium channel antagonists (e.g., Adalat® Capsule) and nitrates (e.g., Nitorol® Tablet) are used as drugs to relax the LES. In patients with pronounced subjective symptoms, complete relief of the symptoms can often not be obtained with pharmacotherapy alone. Currently, pharmacotherapy is generally recognized as the treatment option of choice for patients with mild disorder and for those who are not suitable candidates for endoscopic therapy or surgery, as well as for temporary relief of symptoms. The medications are also prescribed as needed in case of postoperative chest pain. Calcium antagonists are subject to off-label use in terms of national health insurance scheme. 5.2 Endoscopic treatment (1) Dilatation therapy [11-13] Following endoscopic insertion of a guidewire into the stomach, a balloon (usually, a 30-mm balloon) is placed at the gastroesophageal junction along the guidewire under fluoroscopic guidance; the balloon is then gradually inflated, beginning at a low pneumatic pressure level, while checking for pain until the balloon notches disappear. The pneumatic pressure is further elevated slightly to dilate the balloon while checking for pain, although excessive pressurization may be risky. The reported effectiveness rates of balloon dilatation range from 66 to 93%, hence virtually comparable to effectiveness rates of surgical treatment. However, the reported effectiveness rates of balloon dilatation in young adults (under 40 years of age) are poorly responsive to treatment. Symptoms recur in about 33% of patients at 4 to 6 years after balloon dilatation. Complications include reflux esophagitis, chest pain, fever, and perforation. The conditions and frequency of balloon dilatation should be stated in each case of dilatation therapy. (2) Botulinum toxin local injection therapy [14, 15] Botulinum toxin local injection reduces in the LES pressure via inhibiting neurotransmitter release from the preganglionic cholinergic neurons. In botulinum toxin local injection therapy, 100 IU of type A botulinum toxin is injected endoscopically into the 4 quadrants of the LES. Relapse is often reported in 6–12 months. Use of botulinum toxin local injection therapy for achalasia cardia is subject to off-label use for the purpose of coverage by the national health insurance scheme in Japan. (3) Endoscopic myotomy [16] This procedure consists of peroral endoscopic myotomy performed on the esophageal submucosa. Use of endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia cardia is listed as off-label use for the purpose of coverage by the national health insurance scheme. 5.3 Surgical treatment [17-24] Surgical treatment [17-24] Surgical treatment was previously performed via a laparotomy, and the procedure has recently become supplanted by a laparoscopic technique. Heller’s myotomy to relieve obstruction combined with a reflux-preventive procedure to prevent post-myotomy gastroesophageal reflux, especially the Dor technique, is widely used, with gratifying response rates of as high as about 90%. The length of muscle layer incision, whether the short gastric arteries vessels were dissected or not, whether an esophageal bougie was inserted during the operation or not, and whether there was any intraoperative mucosal injury or not should be stated. II Other Esophageal Motility Disorders [25−30] 1. Diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) (Figs. 16, 17, 18)
Fig. 16

Esophageal manometry in a patient with DES by ManoScan 360™ (Sierra Scientific Instruments Inc.). a Normal peristalsis. b Simultaneous contractions

Fig. 17

Esophageal manometry in a patient with DES by high-resolution manometry. a Normal peristalsis. b Simultaneous contractions

Fig. 18

Radiographic appearance in a patient with DES

DES is a motility disorder characterized by occasional, persistent or repetitive abnormal contractions while peristaltic waves are usually normal, and may cause dysphagia and chest pain. One of the diagnostic criteria is that 2 or more repetitive simultaneous contractions account for 20% or more of the peristalsis on water swallow. The abnormality may be accompanied with multi-peaked contractions, elevation of the amplitude of the peristaltic waves, spontaneous contractions, and incomplete LES relaxation. Esophageal X-ray findings may include simultaneous contractions (nonperistaltic contractions), corkscrew appearance, arrest of contrast medium passage, and pocket formation. 2. Nutcracker esophagus (Figs. 19, 20)
Fig. 19

Esophageal high-resolution manometry findings in a patient with nutcracker esophagus. Manometric instrument: Trace ! (Dr. G.S. Hebbard, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia)

Fig. 20

X-ray (a) and endoscopic (b) images of nutcracker esophagus

Nutcracker esophagus is one of primary esophageal motility disorders. Nutcracker esophagus is defined as normal peristalsis of the esophageal body with an average distal esophageal amplitude exceeding 180 mm Hg and often has non-cardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Barium swallows are usually normal but a corkscrew-like esophagus, reminiscent of the findings of diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), is observed occasionally. 3. Hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (Hypertensive LES) This esophageal motility disorder is characterized by elevation of LES pressure, causing chest pain and dysphagia. A mean resting LES static pressure of ≥45 mmHg, normal relaxation of the LES, and normal peristaltic waves of the esophageal body are essential for diagnosis of this disorder. 4. Non-specific esophageal motility disorder (NEMD) (Fig.  21)
Fig. 21

Esophageal manometric features in NEMD. Manometric instrument: INSIGHT (Sandhill Scientific Instruments Inc.)

NEMD represents a spectrum of esophageal motility abnormalities presenting with apparent esophageal manometric tests, but failing to meet the diagnostic criteria for the esophageal manometric features of achalasia, DES, nutcracker esophagus or hypertensive LES. The most common manometric finding among the esophageal motility abnormalities is the occurrence of low contraction waves with amplitudes of ≤30 mmHg or nonpropagating contractions in the lower esophagus. According to the latest classification of esophageal manometry, detection of the above manometric finding on water swallowing at a frequency of ≥30% is newly defined as ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). 5. Esophageal motility dysfunctions complicating other diseases Esophageal motility dysfunction may be associated with collagen diseases such as scleroderma and systemic lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus, amyloidosis, eosinophilic esophagitis, neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, and alcohol dependence. 6. Pseudoachalasia This disorder presents with apparently achalasia-like symptoms/findings associated with malignancy, such as carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Esophageal manometry in a patient with DES by ManoScan 360™ (Sierra Scientific Instruments Inc.). a Normal peristalsis. b Simultaneous contractions Esophageal manometry in a patient with DES by high-resolution manometry. a Normal peristalsis. b Simultaneous contractions Radiographic appearance in a patient with DES Esophageal high-resolution manometry findings in a patient with nutcracker esophagus. Manometric instrument: Trace ! (Dr. G.S. Hebbard, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia) X-ray (a) and endoscopic (b) images of nutcracker esophagus Esophageal manometric features in NEMD. Manometric instrument: INSIGHT (Sandhill Scientific Instruments Inc.)
  25 in total

Review 1.  [Esophageal motor function in nonachalasia motility disorders].

Authors:  Motoyasu Kusano; Masaki Maeda; Yasuyuki Shimoyama; Shikou Kuribayashi; Masatomo Mori
Journal:  Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2003-09

2.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  H Inoue; H Minami; Y Kobayashi; Y Sato; M Kaga; M Suzuki; H Satodate; N Odaka; H Itoh; S Kudo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Effect of sildenafil on oesophageal motor function in healthy subjects and patients with oesophageal motor disorders.

Authors:  A J Eherer; I Schwetz; H F Hammer; T Petnehazy; S J Scheidl; K Weber; G J Krejs
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Pneumatic dilatation or laparoscopic cardiomyotomy in the management of newly diagnosed idiopathic achalasia. Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Kostic; A Kjellin; M Ruth; H Lönroth; E Johnsson; M Andersson; L Lundell
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM): the primary finding in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder.

Authors:  L P Leite; B T Johnston; J Barrett; J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Pneumatic dilatation and surgical myotomy for achalasia.

Authors:  Steven R Lopushinsky; David R Urbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Treatment of Achalasia.

Authors:  Jedediah A Kaufman; Brant K Oelschlager
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02

8.  Four hundred laparoscopic myotomies for esophageal achalasia: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Giovanni Zaninotto; Mario Costantini; Christian Rizzetto; Lisa Zanatta; Emanuela Guirroli; Giuseppe Portale; Loredana Nicoletti; Francesco Cavallin; Giorgio Battaglia; Alberto Ruol; Ermanno Ancona
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The effect of verapamil on the lower esophageal sphincter pressure in normal subjects and in achalasia.

Authors:  B S Becker; R Burakoff
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Minimally invasive management of achalasia cardia: results from a single center study.

Authors:  C Palanivelu; G S Maheshkumar; Kalpesh Jani; R Parthasarthi; K Sendhilkumar; M Rangarajan
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  17 in total

1.  Possible new endoscopic finding in patients with achalasia: "Gingko leaf sign".

Authors:  Yoshimasa Hoshikawa; Shintaro Hoshino; Noriyuki Kawami; Tomohide Tanabe; Yuriko Hanada; Nana Takenouchi; Osamu Goto; Mitsuru Kaise; Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.230

2.  Long-term dysphagia resolution following POEM versus Heller myotomy for achalasia patients.

Authors:  Grace E Shea; Morgan K Johnson; Manasa Venkatesh; Sally A Jolles; Tyler M Prout; Amber L Shada; Jacob A Greenberg; Anne O Lidor; Luke M Funk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Multicenter collaborative retrospective evaluation of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: analysis of data from more than 1300 patients at eight facilities in Japan.

Authors:  Hironari Shiwaku; Haruhiro Inoue; Manabu Onimaru; Hitomi Minami; Hiroki Sato; Chiaki Sato; Shinwa Tanaka; Ryo Ogawa; Norihiko Okushima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Therapeutic efficacy of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery for chest pain in patients with achalasia: a single institutional experience.

Authors:  Kazuto Tsuboi; Nobuo Omura; Fumiaki Yano; Masato Hoshino; Se-Ryung Yamamoto; Shunsuke Akimoto; Takahiro Masuda; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.230

5.  Effect of preoperative balloon dilation on treatment outcomes of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery for achalasia: a propensity score matched study.

Authors:  Kazuto Tsuboi; Nobuo Omura; Fumiaki Yano; Masato Hoshino; Se-Ryung Yamamoto; Shunsuke Akimoto; Takahiro Masuda; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Validation of new Japanese classification system for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Ryo Kato; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tomoki Makino; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.230

7.  Extended Esophageal Achalasia.

Authors:  Yuusaku Sugihara; Hiroyuki Sakae; Kenta Hamada; Hiroyuki Okada
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.271

8.  Differentiating Delayed Esophageal Clearance From Reflux in Scleroderma.

Authors:  Anusha Pasumarthi; Sheena Mago; Promila Banerjee; Micheal Tadros
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-18

9.  Prospective evaluation of the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia.

Authors:  Eun Jeong Gong; Hee Kyong Na; Ji Yong Ahn; Kee Wook Jung; Do Hoon Kim; Kee Don Choi; Ho June Song; Hwoon-Yong Jung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Morphologic Restoration After Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Sigmoid-type Achalasia.

Authors:  Hong Jin Yoon; Jeung Eun Lee; Da Hyun Jung; Jun Chul Park; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.