Helen M Heymann1, Yun Wu1,2, Yao Lu1, Nir Qvit3, Garrett J Gross4, Eric R Gross1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. 3. Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 4. Department of Pharmacology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In light of the opioid epidemic, physicians are increasingly prescribing non-opioid analgesics to surgical patients. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) inhibitors are potentially alternative pain therapeutics for surgery. Here, we examined in rodents whether the cardioprotection conferred by two common procedures during surgery, a laparotomy or morphine delivery, is mediated by the TRPV1 channel. We further tested whether an experimental analgesic peptide (known as P5) targeted against the TRPV1 C-terminus region interferes with laparotomy- or morphine-induced cardioprotection. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to 30 min coronary occlusion followed by 120 min reperfusion. Before ischaemia, a laparotomy with or without capsaicin application (0.1% cream, a TRPV1 activator) was performed. Additional rats were given morphine (0.3 mg·kg-1 ) with or without capsaicin. In addition, capsazepine (3 mg·kg-1 , a classical TRPV1 inhibitor), or P5 (3 mg·kg-1 , a peptide analgesic and TRPV1 inhibitor), was given either alone or prior to a laparotomy or morphine administration. Myocardial infarct size was determined. KEY RESULTS: A laparotomy, in addition to combining a laparotomy with capsaicin cream, reduced infarct size versus control. Morphine, in addition to combining morphine administration with capsaicin cream, also reduced infarct size versus control. When TRPV1 inhibitors capsazepine or P5 were given, either TRPV1 inhibitor abolished the infarct size reduction mediated by a laparotomy or morphine. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Inhibiting the TRPV1 channel blocks laparotomy- or morphine-induced cardioprotection. Impaired organ protection may be a potential pitfall of using TRPV1 inhibitors for pain control.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In light of the opioid epidemic, physicians are increasingly prescribing non-opioid analgesics to surgical patients. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) inhibitors are potentially alternative pain therapeutics for surgery. Here, we examined in rodents whether the cardioprotection conferred by two common procedures during surgery, a laparotomy or morphine delivery, is mediated by the TRPV1 channel. We further tested whether an experimental analgesic peptide (known as P5) targeted against the TRPV1 C-terminus region interferes with laparotomy- or morphine-induced cardioprotection. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to 30 min coronary occlusion followed by 120 min reperfusion. Before ischaemia, a laparotomy with or without capsaicin application (0.1% cream, a TRPV1 activator) was performed. Additional rats were given morphine (0.3 mg·kg-1 ) with or without capsaicin. In addition, capsazepine (3 mg·kg-1 , a classical TRPV1 inhibitor), or P5 (3 mg·kg-1 , a peptide analgesic and TRPV1 inhibitor), was given either alone or prior to a laparotomy or morphine administration. Myocardial infarct size was determined. KEY RESULTS: A laparotomy, in addition to combining a laparotomy with capsaicin cream, reduced infarct size versus control. Morphine, in addition to combining morphine administration with capsaicin cream, also reduced infarct size versus control. When TRPV1 inhibitors capsazepine or P5 were given, either TRPV1 inhibitor abolished the infarct size reduction mediated by a laparotomy or morphine. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Inhibiting the TRPV1 channel blocks laparotomy- or morphine-induced cardioprotection. Impaired organ protection may be a potential pitfall of using TRPV1 inhibitors for pain control.
Authors: Garrett J Gross; Anna Hsu; Eric R Gross; John R Falck; Kasem Nithipatikom Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-03-09 Impact factor: 2.457
Authors: Patrick Meybohm; Berthold Bein; Oana Brosteanu; Jochen Cremer; Matthias Gruenewald; Christian Stoppe; Mark Coburn; Gereon Schaelte; Andreas Böning; Bernd Niemann; Jan Roesner; Frank Kletzin; Ulrich Strouhal; Christian Reyher; Rita Laufenberg-Feldmann; Marion Ferner; Ivo F Brandes; Martin Bauer; Sebastian N Stehr; Andreas Kortgen; Maria Wittmann; Georg Baumgarten; Tanja Meyer-Treschan; Peter Kienbaum; Matthias Heringlake; Julika Schön; Michael Sander; Sascha Treskatsch; Thorsten Smul; Ewa Wolwender; Thomas Schilling; Georg Fuernau; Dirk Hasenclever; Kai Zacharowski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Pierluigi Valente; Asia Fernández-Carvajal; María Camprubí-Robles; Ana Gomis; Susana Quirce; Félix Viana; Gregorio Fernández-Ballester; José M González-Ros; Carlos Belmonte; Rosa Planells-Cases; Antonio Ferrer-Montiel Journal: FASEB J Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Stephen P Hoole; Patrick M Heck; Linda Sharples; Sadia N Khan; Rudolf Duehmke; Cameron G Densem; Sarah C Clarke; Leonard M Shapiro; Peter M Schofield; Michael O'Sullivan; David P Dutka Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Niteen Tapuria; Yogesh Kumar; Meer Mohammad Habib; Mahmoud Abu Amara; Alexander M Seifalian; Brian R Davidson Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Alexandr S Gorbunov; Leonid N Maslov; Amteshwar S Jaggi; Nirmal Singh; Luciano De Petrocellis; Alla A Boshchenko; Ali Roohbakhsh; Vladimir V Bezuglov; Peter R Oeltgen Journal: Curr Cardiol Rev Date: 2019
Authors: Tamara Szabados; Kamilla Gömöri; Laura Pálvölgyi; Anikó Görbe; István Baczkó; Zsuzsanna Helyes; Gábor Jancsó; Péter Ferdinandy; Péter Bencsik Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 5.923