Literature DB >> 28981825

The Influence of Sniffing on Airflow and Odorant Deposition in the Canine Nasal Cavity.

Alex D Rygg1, Blaire Van Valkenburgh1, Brent A Craven2.   

Abstract

Nasal airflow plays a critical role in olfaction by transporting odorant from the environment to the olfactory epithelium, where chemical detection occurs. Most studies of olfaction neglect the unsteadiness of sniffing and assume that nasal airflow and odorant transport are "quasi-steady," wherein reality most mammals "sniff." Here, we perform computational fluid dynamics simulations of airflow and odorant deposition in an anatomically accurate model of the coyote (Canis latrans) nasal cavity during quiet breathing, a notional quasi-steady sniff, and unsteady sniffing to: quantify the influence of unsteady sniffing, assess the validity of the quasi-steady assumption, and investigate the functional advantages of sniffing compared to breathing. Our results reveal that flow unsteadiness during sniffing does not appreciably influence qualitative (gross airflow and odorant deposition patterns) or quantitative (time-averaged olfactory flow rate and odorant uptake) measures of olfactory function. A quasi-steady approximation is, therefore, justified for simulating time-averaged olfactory function in the canine nose. Simulations of sniffing versus quiet breathing demonstrate that sniffing delivers about 2.5 times more air to the olfactory recess and results in 2.5-3 times more uptake of highly- and moderately-soluble odorants in the sensory region per unit time, suggesting one reason why dogs actively sniff. Simulations also reveal significantly different deposition patterns in the olfactory region during inspiration for different odorants, and that during expiration there is little retronasal odorant deposition in the sensory region. These results significantly improve our understanding of canine olfaction, and have several practical implications regarding computer simulation of olfactory function.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  canine olfaction; coyote; nasal airflow; odorant deposition; retronasal olfaction; sniff

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28981825     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjx053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  7 in total

1.  Differential Impacts of Repeated Sampling on Odor Representations by Genetically-Defined Mitral and Tufted Cell Subpopulations in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb.

Authors:  Thomas P Eiting; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Tests of the sorption and olfactory "fovea" hypotheses in the mouse.

Authors:  David M Coppola; Brittaney E Ritchie; Brent A Craven
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A 3D transcriptomics atlas of the mouse nose sheds light on the anatomical logic of smell.

Authors:  Mayra L Ruiz Tejada Segura; Eman Abou Moussa; Elisa Garabello; Thiago S Nakahara; Melanie Makhlouf; Lisa S Mathew; Li Wang; Filippo Valle; Susie S Y Huang; Joel D Mainland; Michele Caselle; Matteo Osella; Stephan Lorenz; Johannes Reisert; Darren W Logan; Bettina Malnic; Antonio Scialdone; Luis R Saraiva
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Convergent evolution of an extreme dietary specialisation, the olfactory system of worm-eating rodents.

Authors:  Quentin Martinez; Renaud Lebrun; Anang S Achmadi; Jacob A Esselstyn; Alistair R Evans; Lawrence R Heaney; Roberto Portela Miguez; Kevin C Rowe; Pierre-Henri Fabre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Tests of the chromatographic theory of olfaction with highly soluble odors: a combined electro-olfactogram and computational fluid dynamics study in the mouse.

Authors:  David M Coppola; Emily Fitzwater; Alex D Rygg; Brent A Craven
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.422

6.  Sniffing speeds up chemical detection by controlling air-flows near sensors.

Authors:  Thomas L Spencer; Adams Clark; Jordi Fonollosa; Emmanuel Virot; David L Hu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Hope for Ostomates: A Carbon and Zeolite Impregnated Polyester Fabric Inhibits Urine Odor in Cancer Patients: A Randomized Experimental Study.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Linda M Thiel; Desiree L Miller; Lorenzo Tidu; Paolo Sardella; Patricia Camp; Matteo Luigi Zanoni; Paolo Vota; Cinzia Mazzieri; Giovanni Toia; Vittorio Fasulo; Pierpaolo Avolio; Alessio Benetti; Niccolò Buffi; Giovanni Lughezzani; Massimo Lazzeri; Paolo Casale; Giorgio Guazzoni; Fabio Grizzi; Brian Stork
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.