Literature DB >> 28981111

Mechanisms of bystander effects in retinal pigment epithelium cell networks.

Masaaki Ishii1, Bärbel Rohrer1,2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28981111      PMCID: PMC5680572          DOI: 10.1038/cddis.2017.449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Death Dis            Impact factor:   8.469


× No keyword cloud information.
The bystander effect is part of a cell’s cell–cell communication repertoire, and refers to the observation that biological effects can be observed in cells that are not directly targeted. This type of communication can be mediated by intercellular communication via gap junctions (GJs), or by messengers released from targeted cells that travel across the plasma membrane or are secreted extracellularly.[1] This phenomenon has been studied in radiobiology and was first reported in 1992.[2] However, it has since been observed to have a role in various types of cells and tissues. Overall, these results have led Brooks[3] to conclude that the ‘bystander effects suggest that organs respond as a unit and are not just a bag of individual cells acting independently’. Ishii and Rohrer[4] have studied bystander effects in networks of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells, using high-resolution imaging. The RPE lends itself to this kind of two-dimensional analysis, since it is composed of a single layer of hexagonal cells that are connected by tight and adherence junctions to establish barrier function, and GJs to mediate intercellular communication,[5] features that can be replicated in vitro. The RPE is of interest in diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), macular edema and diabetic retinopathy, whose disease processes involve oxidative stress. The authors argued that since the RPE is a highly coupled network, any individual cell will be significantly affected by the behavior of its neighbors; and second, they suggested that the susceptibility of a given cell to bystander signals is dependent upon its prior metabolic history and mitochondrial health. Cell–cell communication was examined using live-cell imaging in response to blue-laser spot simulation of individual cells. Blue light was chosen since it is assumed as a risk factor for AMD,[6] it induces reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and lipid peroxidation in RPE cells[7] resulting in apoptotic cell death;[8] and it can cause mitochondrial damage.[9] As cellular readouts of cell–cell communication and mitochondrial health, the characteristics of induction and transfer of ROS and calcium ions (Ca2+) to connected neighboring cells and their mitochondrial membrane potential (ψm) was examined (Figure 1); readouts of long-term consequences included the analysis of cell death.
Figure 1

(a) Rapid information transfer mediated by the bystander effect differs for ROS and Ca2+. Information related to ROS (hydrogen peroxide, H2O2, and hydroxyl radicals,·OH−) peaks and spreads rapidly in a radial manner from the stimulated cell (blue-light stimulus) to its neighbors, leading to long-lasting changes in ROS in all connected cells. In contrast, the transfer of the calcium (Ca2+) signal was not uniform, but rather was restricted to only certain neighboring cells, with concomitant changes in ψm only being elicited in cells that also received the Ca2+ signal. (b) Cell death as a long-term consequence of photo-oxidative stress-mediated bystander effect in RPE network. In the central cell, photo-stimulation of the mitochondrial network was found to lead to an increase in ROS and mitochondrial Ca2+ as well as a loss in mitochondrial membrane potential (ψm), leading to rapid cell death. Local oxidative stress in a donor cell subsequently triggered metabolic changes in certain connected recipient cells, an effect that required gap junction (GJ) communication and an ROS-Ca2+ dual-hit, resulting in slow cell death. The transfer of the Ca2+ signal to neighboring cells requires GJ communication; the transfer of the ROS signal does not. Cell death triggered by mitochondrial Ca2+ overload was mediated by endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-mitochondria Ca2+ transfer, involving Ca2+ uptake via the SERCA/ER ATPase, ER efflux via the ryanodine receptor (RyR), and Ca2+ uptake into the mitochondria via the uniporter or the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MCU, mPTP)

Stimulation of a single, randomly selected RPE cell within an established network with blue light (488 nm laser; 20 ms flashes at 1 Hz, 38 kw/cm2 intensity) resulted in the rapid generation of a continuous ROS signal (hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), H2DCFDA) followed by the generation of hydroxyl radicals (CellRox-Green) in the stimulated cell. This was followed by a transient increase first in cytosolic and subsequently mitochondrial Ca2+ (Fluo8). Upon transfer of Ca2+ into the mitochondria, mitochondrial membrane potential changes (ψm; tetramethylrhodamine-methyl ester (TMRM)) were triggered, starting with a transient increase in membrane hyperpolarization followed by membrane depolarization. On the basis of the known biology of oxidative stress, these changes were predictable. However, what makes this manuscript exciting and novel, is the analysis of the bystander effect in connected cells. Each RPE cell is coupled to six neighboring cells; however, signal transfer differed, depending on the metabolite analyzed (Figure 1). ROS signals were found to spread rapidly and radially, leading to long-lasting changes in ROS in all connected cells. In contrast, the Ca2+ signal was transmitted to only certain neighboring cells, and changes in ψm was restricted to cells that received the Ca2+ signal. To determine the potential mechanism of signal transfer, GJ blockers 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid (βGA) or 1-octanol were added. While the transfer of the ROS signal was not inhibited by GJ blockers, the transfer of the Ca2+ signal and the subsequent changes in ψm were completely eliminated. Calcium is an essential intracellular signaling molecule, and its levels are tightly regulated. Relevant for this study, mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) have important roles in Ca2+uptake and release, and a link between Ca2+ dysregulation, mitochondrial alterations and cell death has been evident in many disorders. Also, melanin, a hallmark of RPE, binds Ca2+. In the current study, Ca2+ levels were found not to be uniform in the resting RPE network. Interestingly, both the ROS increase and the ψm amplitude elicited by the bystander effect in a given surrounding cell exhibited a linear correlation with the cell’s baseline Ca2+ concentration. Likewise, Ca2+ levels were found to be negatively correlated with the amount of pigmentation present in a cell, supporting a role of melanin in the regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis.[10] Since Ca2+ homeostasis is essential for cell survival, the RPE networks were analyzed over a 20 h period to examine the long-term consequences of photo-oxidative stress. Laser stimulation of a single RPE cells was found to induce cell death (To-Pro3) in approximately half the cells present in the recording window. Application of βGA reduced cell death to ~10%. Intriguingly, and similar to the short-term results on mitochondrial health, the higher the Ca2+concentration at baseline, the greater the risk for the cell to undergo future cell death. The ER and mitochondria as Ca2+-storing organelles, and mitochondria as the major checkpoint for apoptosis have been studied extensively. Ca2+ transfer between the cytoplasm and the ER is mediated via the sarco/ER Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA), its ER release is mediated via the activation of either IP3 or ryanodine receptors, and mitochondrial uptake is accomplished via a Ca2+-uniporter.[11] In the RPE network, a critical role for the ER could be identified, as the SERCA inhibitor thapsigargin (Sigma Aldrich) reduced cell death to <10%. ER Ca2+ release was mediated by ryanodine receptors, as the IP3-receptor antagonist – 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2APB) did not inhibit cell death, whereas the ryanodine-receptor antagonist, dantrolene did. Finally, an essential role for mitochondrial Ca2+ release was verified by demonstrating that treatment with the mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake inhibitor Ru360 completely inhibited cell death. Together, these results suggest that Ca2+-mediated cell death in RPE networks is mediated by ER-mitochondria Ca2+ transfer.[11] The results presented by Ishii and Rohrer[4] convincingly demonstrate that local photo-oxidative stress in a donor RPE cell can trigger cellular damage that require a dual-hit of ROS and Ca2+-related signals. The identified metabolic signature of elevated baseline Ca2+ levels should be further investigated as a contributing factor to disease processes in networks of cells in which initial damage seems to occur in susceptible, and is delayed in more resilient areas.
  11 in total

Review 1.  The bystander effect.

Authors:  Eric J Hall
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; J B Little
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Evidence for 'bystander effects' in vivo.

Authors:  Antone L Brooks
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Blue light induces mitochondrial DNA damage and free radical production in epithelial cells.

Authors:  Bernard F Godley; Farrukh A Shamsi; Fong-Qi Liang; Stuart G Jarrett; Sallyanne Davies; Mike Boulton
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Ca(2+) transfer from the ER to mitochondria: when, how and why.

Authors:  Rosario Rizzuto; Saverio Marchi; Massimo Bonora; Paola Aguiari; Angela Bononi; Diego De Stefani; Carlotta Giorgi; Sara Leo; Alessandro Rimessi; Roberta Siviero; Erika Zecchini; Paolo Pinton
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-03-31

6.  Quantification of Ca(2+) binding to melanin supports the hypothesis that melanosomes serve a functional role in regulating calcium homeostasis.

Authors:  William D Bush; John D Simon
Journal:  Pigment Cell Res       Date:  2007-04

Review 7.  Lutein: more than just a filter for blue light.

Authors:  Aize Kijlstra; Yuan Tian; Elton R Kelly; Tos T J M Berendschot
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 21.198

8.  Functional analysis of hemichannels and gap-junctional channels formed by connexins 43 and 46.

Authors:  Quan V Hoang; Haohua Qian; Harris Ripps
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.367

9.  Mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species mediate blue light-induced death of retinal pigment epithelial cells.

Authors:  Ayala King; Eyal Gottlieb; David G Brooks; Michael P Murphy; Joshua L Dunaief
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.421

10.  Blue LED light exposure develops intracellular reactive oxygen species, lipid peroxidation, and subsequent cellular injuries in cultured bovine retinal pigment epithelial cells.

Authors:  T Nakanishi-Ueda; H J Majima; K Watanabe; T Ueda; H P Indo; S Suenaga; T Hisamitsu; T Ozawa; H Yasuhara; R Koide
Journal:  Free Radic Res       Date:  2013-08-22
View more
  3 in total

1.  Mechanisms of extracellular vesicle uptake in stressed retinal pigment epithelial cell monolayers.

Authors:  Crystal Nicholson; Navjot Shah; Masaaki Ishii; Balasubramaniam Annamalai; Carlene Brandon; Jessalyn Rodgers; Tamara Nowling; Bärbel Rohrer
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.187

2.  Amyloid-Beta Peptides and Activated Astroglia Impairs Proliferation of Nerve Growth Factor Releasing Cells In Vitro: Implication for Encapsulated Cell Biodelivery-Mediated AD Therapy.

Authors:  Sumonto Mitra; Silvia Turchetto; Winant Van Os; Lars U Wahlberg; Bengt Linderoth; Homira Behbahani; Maria Eriksdotter
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Gap junctions and connexin hemichannels both contribute to the electrical properties of retinal pigment epithelium.

Authors:  Julia Fadjukov; Sophia Wienbar; Satu Hakanen; Vesa Aho; Maija Vihinen-Ranta; Teemu O Ihalainen; Gregory W Schwartz; Soile Nymark
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.000

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.