Literature DB >> 15070062

Evidence for 'bystander effects' in vivo.

Antone L Brooks1.   

Abstract

The observation of bystander effects in vitro have raised some serious questions as to the appropriate target size for calculation radiation dose. This has implications on the risk from ionizing radiation since dose is often directly related to radiation risk. This paper demonstrates that bystander effects do occur in vivo. It demonstrates that at low dose rates the bystander effects and risk are limited to the organ where the radiation dose is delivered. On the other hand, exposure to high radiation dose rates produces clastogenic factors that are released into the blood. These factors have been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo and may influence risk in organs not directly exposed to the radiation. Bystander effects suggest that organs respond as a unit and are not just a bag of individual cells acting independently. Dose and risk must consider this unit.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15070062     DOI: 10.1191/0960327104ht419oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol        ISSN: 0960-3271            Impact factor:   2.903


  10 in total

1.  Computational modeling of cellular effects post-irradiation with low- and high-let particles and different absorbed doses.

Authors:  Adriana Alexandre S Tavares; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Low dose radiation effects on the brain - from mechanisms and behavioral outcomes to mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Anna Kovalchuk; Bryan Kolb
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Epigenetic bystander-like effects of stroke in somatic organs.

Authors:  Anna Kovalchuk; Michael Lowings; Rocio Rodriguez-Juarez; Arif Muhammad; Slava Ilnytskyy; Bryan Kolb; Olga Kovalchuk
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Evaluation of Anti-Tumor Effects of Whole-Body Low-Dose Irradiation in Metastatic Mouse Models.

Authors:  Kyung-Hee Song; Seung-Youn Jung; Jeong-In Park; Jiyeon Ahn; Jong-Kuk Park; Sang-Gu Hwang; Eun-Ho Kim; Seon Young Nam; Seungwoo Park; Hunjoo Ha; Jie-Young Song
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Mesothelioma: Do asbestos and carbon nanotubes pose the same health risk?

Authors:  Marie-Claude F Jaurand; Annie Renier; Julien Daubriac
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  Dose calculations for [(131)i] meta-iodobenzylguanidine-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  M D Gow; C B Seymour; M Boyd; R J Mairs; W V Prestiwch; C E Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Epigenetics in radiation biology: a new research frontier.

Authors:  Matt Merrifield; Olga Kovalchuk
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  The Fukushima nuclear accident and the pale grass blue butterfly: evaluating biological effects of long-term low-dose exposures.

Authors:  Atsuki Hiyama; Chiyo Nohara; Wataru Taira; Seira Kinjo; Masaki Iwata; Joji M Otaki
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Neutron exposures in human cells: bystander effect and relative biological effectiveness.

Authors:  Isheeta Seth; Jeffrey L Schwartz; Robert D Stewart; Robert Emery; Michael C Joiner; James D Tucker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mechanisms of bystander effects in retinal pigment epithelium cell networks.

Authors:  Masaaki Ishii; Bärbel Rohrer
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 8.469

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.