PURPOSE: Progress in identifying genes for deafness together with implementation of universal audiologic screening of newborns has provided the opportunity for more widespread use of molecular tests to detect genetic forms of hearing loss. Efforts to assess consumer attitudes toward these advances have lagged behind. METHODS: Consumer focus groups were held to explore attitudes toward genetic advances and technologies for hearing loss, views about newborn hearing screening, and reactions to the idea of adding molecular screening for hearing loss at birth. Focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed and analyzed. RESULTS: Five focus groups with 44 participants including hearing parents of deaf children, deaf parents and young deaf adults were held. Focus group participants supported the use of genetic tests to identify the etiology of hearing loss but were concerned that genetic information might influence reproductive decisions. Molecular newborn screening was advocated by some; however, others expressed concern about its effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Documenting the attitudes of parents and other consumers toward genetic technologies establishes the framework for discussions on the appropriateness of molecular newborn screening for hearing loss and informs specialists about potential areas of public education necessary prior to the implementation of such screening.
PURPOSE: Progress in identifying genes for deafness together with implementation of universal audiologic screening of newborns has provided the opportunity for more widespread use of molecular tests to detect genetic forms of hearing loss. Efforts to assess consumer attitudes toward these advances have lagged behind. METHODS: Consumer focus groups were held to explore attitudes toward genetic advances and technologies for hearing loss, views about newborn hearing screening, and reactions to the idea of adding molecular screening for hearing loss at birth. Focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed and analyzed. RESULTS: Five focus groups with 44 participants including hearing parents of deaf children, deaf parents and young deaf adults were held. Focus group participants supported the use of genetic tests to identify the etiology of hearing loss but were concerned that genetic information might influence reproductive decisions. Molecular newborn screening was advocated by some; however, others expressed concern about its effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Documenting the attitudes of parents and other consumers toward genetic technologies establishes the framework for discussions on the appropriateness of molecular newborn screening for hearing loss and informs specialists about potential areas of public education necessary prior to the implementation of such screening.
Authors: Christina G S Palmer; Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Michelle Fox; Joshua L Deignan; Yoko Kobayashi; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne Grody; Janet S Sinsheimer Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Michelle Fox; Loriel Dutton; Leeelle Tullis; Joyce Linden; Yoko Kobayashi; Jin Zhou; Janet S Sinsheimer; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne W Grody; Christina G S Palmer Journal: J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ Date: 2010-05-20
Authors: Aisen V Solovyev; Lilya U Dzhemileva; Olga L Posukh; Nikolay A Barashkov; Marita S Bady-Khoo; Semen L Lobov; Natalya Yu Popova; Georgii P Romanov; Nikolay N Sazonov; Alexander A Bondar; Igor V Morozov; Mikhail I Tomsky; Sardana A Fedorova; Elza K Khusnutdinova Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2017-03-21
Authors: Christina G S Palmer; Ariadna Martinez; Michelle Fox; Jin Zhou; Nina Shapiro; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne W Grody; Lisa A Schimmenti Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Christina G S Palmer; Ariadna Martinez; Michelle Fox; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne W Grody; Lisa A Schimmenti Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2007-10-19 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Honey Nagakura; Gretchen Schneider; James Morris; Katherine A Lafferty; Christina G S Palmer Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 2.537