Literature DB >> 28979535

Exploring obstacles to critical care trials in the UK: A qualitative investigation.

Natalie Pattison1, Nishkantha Arulkumaran2, Sally Humphreys3, Tim Walsh4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials in critical care are often resource-intense, with many unique challenges. Barriers to effective recruitment and implementation of study intervention have not been explored in a UK context. AIM: To identify facilitating factors and barriers to enrolling patients into critical care clinical trials within the UK from clinician's perspectives.
METHODS: A qualitative interview study was undertaken on behalf of the National Institute of Health Research critical care specialty group, in which research active clinicians across different Clinical Research Networks were interviewed. A loosely structured interview schedule was used, based on themes generated from the literature associated with accessing critical care trials. Research teams (critical care doctors, research nurses, and trial coordinators) from hospitals from each Clinical Research Network were contacted to try to achieve representation across the UK.
RESULTS: Interviews were carried out across nine UK Clinical Research Networks with a range of doctors and research nurses. All hospitals were teaching hospitals with varying research nurse numbers and allocated consultant research sessions. There were a range of six to nine ongoing clinical trials in critical care for each centre representative interviewed. Data were analysed using framework analysis, and six final themes were identified related to factors associated with: centre, unit, resources, study, clinician, and patient/family. The most commonly cited barrier to conducting clinical trials was related to resources, namely insufficient human and financial resources, leading to staff and study recruitment difficulties. Clinical uncertainty and equipoise regarding comparative merits of trials were challenging in terms of engaging critical care teams. A number of patient and family factors added complexities in terms of recruitment; however, refusal rates were generally reported as low.
CONCLUSION: Flexibility in funding and employment by research teams enables continuity of studies and staff. Innovative measures to incentivise research nurses and clinical teams can help recruit more patients into trials. Research teams are highly committed to providing cover to recruit critical care trials, and a significant effort to anticipate barriers is undertaken; these endeavours are summarised to provide guidance for other teams wishing to address any potential difficulties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trials; access; critical care; qualitative

Year:  2016        PMID: 28979535      PMCID: PMC5606357          DOI: 10.1177/1751143716663749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc        ISSN: 1751-1437


  21 in total

Review 1.  Ethical considerations for research in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Luca M Bigatello; Edward George; William E Hurford
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Sangeeta Mehta; Friederike Quittnat Pelletier; Maedean Brown; Cheryl Ethier; David Wells; Lisa Burry; Rod MacDonald
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The role of the clinical research nurse.

Authors:  Claire Louise Gibbs; Karen Lowton
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2012 Mar 7-13

4.  Clinical research into the ICU: clouds at the horizon, once again.

Authors:  Mihaela Matei; Erwin J O Kompanje; Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; Francois Lemaire
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  The 'Consent to Research' paradigm in critical care: challenges and potential solutions.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Celia Zubrinich; John Marshall; Deborah Cook
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Improving clinical trials in the critically ill.

Authors:  Derek C Angus; Jean-Paul Mira; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Ethics is for human subjects too: participant perspectives on responsibility in health research.

Authors:  Susan M Cox; Michael McDonald
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Protecting vulnerable research subjects in critical care trials: enhancing the informed consent process and recommendations for safeguards.

Authors:  Henry Silverman
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  Informed consent and research design in critical care medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settings.

Authors:  Sylvia Dickson; Janet Logan; Suzanne Hagen; Diane Stark; Cathryn Glazener; Alison M McDonald; Gladys McPherson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  4 in total

1.  Synthesis of qualitative research studies regarding the factors surrounding UK critical care trial infrastructure.

Authors:  Natalie Pattison; Nishkantha Arulkumaran; Geraldine O'Gara; Bronwen Connolly; Sally Humphreys; Tim Walsh; Philip Hopkins; Paul Dark
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups.

Authors:  Helen Pocock; Michelle Thomson; Sarah Taylor; Charles D Deakin; Ed England
Journal:  Br Paramed J       Date:  2019-12-01

3.  The research environment of critical care in three Asian countries: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Yuki Kotani; Sungwon Na; Jason Phua; Nobuaki Shime; Tatsuya Kawasaki; Hideto Yasuda; Jong Hun Jun; Atsushi Kawaguchi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-20

4.  Omega-6 sparing effects of parenteral lipid emulsions-an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Quirin Notz; Zheng-Yii Lee; Johannes Menger; Gunnar Elke; Aileen Hill; Peter Kranke; Daniel Roeder; Christopher Lotz; Patrick Meybohm; Daren K Heyland; Christian Stoppe
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.