Literature DB >> 28978748

Spatial organization and interactions of harvester ants during foraging activity.

Jacob D Davidson1,2, Deborah M Gordon3.   

Abstract

Local interactions, when individuals meet, can regulate collective behaviour. In a system without any central control, the rate of interaction may depend simply on how the individuals move around. But interactions could in turn influence movement; individuals might seek out interactions, or their movement in response to interaction could influence further interaction rates. We develop a general framework to address these questions, using collision theory to establish a baseline expected rate of interaction based on proximity. We test the models using data from harvester ant colonies. A colony uses feedback from interactions inside the nest to regulate foraging activity. Potential foragers leave the nest in response to interactions with returning foragers with food. The time series of interactions and local density of ants show how density hotspots lead to interactions that are clustered in time. A correlated random walk null model describes the mixing of potential and returning foragers. A model from collision theory relates walking speed and spatial proximity with the probability of interaction. The results demonstrate that although ants do not mix homogeneously, trends in interaction patterns can be explained simply by the walking speed and local density of surrounding ants.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  collective behaviour; collision theory; interaction; spatial organization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28978748      PMCID: PMC5665826          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  22 in total

1.  Social insects: Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions.

Authors:  Michael J Greene; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The effect of individual variation on the structure and function of interaction networks in harvester ants.

Authors:  Noa Pinter-Wollman; Roy Wollman; Adam Guetz; Susan Holmes; Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Information collection and spread by networks of patrolling ants.

Authors:  F R Adler; D M Gordon
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Network-based diffusion analysis reveals cultural transmission of lobtail feeding in humpback whales.

Authors:  Jenny Allen; Mason Weinrich; Will Hoppitt; Luke Rendell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Desert ants achieve reliable recruitment across noisy interactions.

Authors:  Nitzan Razin; Jean-Pierre Eckmann; Ofer Feinerman
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Analyzing fish movement as a persistent turning walker.

Authors:  Jacques Gautrais; Christian Jost; Marc Soria; Alexandre Campo; Sébastien Motsch; Richard Fournier; Stéphane Blanco; Guy Theraulaz
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  The nest architecture of the ant, Camponotus socius.

Authors:  Walter R Tschinkel
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.857

8.  The nest architecture of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius.

Authors:  Walter R Tschinkel
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2004-07-02       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds.

Authors:  Lucy M Aplin; Damien R Farine; Richard P Mann; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Collective sensing and collective responses in quorum-sensing bacteria.

Authors:  R Popat; D M Cornforth; L McNally; S P Brown
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  7 in total

1.  Systems Neuroscience of Natural Behaviors in Rodents.

Authors:  Emily Jane Dennis; Ahmed El Hady; Angie Michaiel; Ann Clemens; Dougal R Gowan Tervo; Jakob Voigts; Sandeep Robert Datta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  How ants move: individual and collective scaling properties.

Authors:  Riccardo Gallotti; Dante R Chialvo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Architecture, space and information in constructions built by humans and social insects: a conceptual review.

Authors:  Tim Ireland; Simon Garnier
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Measuring collective behavior: an ecological approach.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.919

5.  Social networks predict the life and death of honey bees.

Authors:  Benjamin Wild; David M Dormagen; Adrian Zachariae; Michael L Smith; Kirsten S Traynor; Dirk Brockmann; Iain D Couzin; Tim Landgraf
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Cellular sociology regulates the hierarchical spatial patterning and organization of cells in organisms.

Authors:  Shambavi Ganesh; Beliz Utebay; Jeremy Heit; Ahmet F Coskun
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.411

7.  Spatial fidelity of workers predicts collective response to disturbance in a social insect.

Authors:  James D Crall; Nick Gravish; Andrew M Mountcastle; Sarah D Kocher; Robert L Oppenheimer; Naomi E Pierce; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.