Literature DB >> 28978564

Mobile Screening Units for the Early Detection of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Zoë R Greenwald1,2, Mariam El-Zein2, Sheila Bouten2, Heydar Ensha2, Fabiana L Vazquez3, Eduardo L Franco4,2.   

Abstract

Mobile screening units (MSUs) provide cancer screening services outside of fixed clinical sites, thereby increasing access to early detection services. We conducted a systematic review of the performance of MSUs for the early detection of cancer. Databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, WHO Global Health Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO) were searched up to July 2015. Studies describing screening for breast, cervical, and colon cancer using MSUs were included. Data were collected for operational aspects including the performance of exams, screening tests used, and outcomes of case detection. Of 268 identified studies, 78 were included. Studies investigated screening for cancers including breast (n = 55), cervical (n = 12), colon (n = 1), and multiphasic screening for multiple cancers (n = 10). The median number of screening exams performed per intervention was 1,767 (interquartile range 5,656-38,233). Programs operated in 20 countries, mostly in North America (36%) and Europe (36%); 52% served mixed rural/urban regions, while 35% and 13% served rural or urban regions, respectfully. We conclude that MSUs have served to expand access to screening in diverse contexts. However, further research on the implementation of MSUs in low-resource settings and health economic research on cost-effectiveness of MSUs compared with fixed clinics to inform policymakers is needed. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(12); 1679-94. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28978564     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  15 in total

1.  The Impact of Massachusetts Health Reform on Colorectal and Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Kirsten Y Eom; Bassam Dahman; Jie Li; Nengliang Yao; G J van Londen; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Do Non-participants at Screening have a Different Threshold for an Acceptable Benefit-Harm Ratio than Participants? Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Tina Birgitte Hansen; Jes Sanddal Lindholt; Axel Diederichsen; Rikke Søgaard
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Mobile Screening Unit (MSU) for the Implementation of the 'Screen and Treat' Programme for Cervical Cancer Prevention In Pune, India.

Authors:  Smita Joshi; Richard Muwonge; Vinay Kulkarni; Eric Lucas; Sanjeevani Kulkarni; Seema Kand; Mahesh Mandolkar; Mufid Baig; Sudhakar Wankhede; Kavita Surwase; Dilip Pardeshi; Partha Basu; Sankaranarayanan Rengaswamy
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of a Mobile Unit for Remote Cognitive Screening of Isolated Elderly in Rural Areas.

Authors:  Radia Zeghari; Rachid Guerchouche; Minh Tran Duc; François Bremond; Maria Pascale Lemoine; Vincent Bultingaire; Kai Langel; Zeger De Groote; Francis Kuhn; Emmanuelle Martin; Philippe Robert; Alexandra König
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggested Interventions for Lung Cancer Screening Among a Rural Screening-Eligible Population.

Authors:  Jenna E Schiffelbein; Kathleen L Carluzzo; Rian M Hasson; Jennifer A Alford-Teaster; Inger Imset; Tracy Onega
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

6.  Evaluation of Changes in the Expression Pattern of EDIL3 in Different Grades of Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Marcin Oplawski; Konrad Dziobek; Nikola Zmarzły; Beniamin Grabarek; Barbara Tomala; Ewa Leśniak; Iwona Adwent; Piotr Januszyk; Dariusz Dąbruś; Dariusz Boroń
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.837

7.  The potential of mobile health clinics in chronic disease prevention and health promotion in universal healthcare systems. An on-field experiment.

Authors:  Chiara Bertoncello; Silvia Cocchio; Marco Fonzo; Silvia Eugenia Bennici; Francesca Russo; Giovanni Putoto
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2020-05-01

8.  Driving Access to Care: Use of Mobile Units for Urine Specimen Collection During the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Authors:  Jill S Warrington; Alexa Brett; Heather Foster; Jamie Brandon; Samuel Francis-Fath; Michael Joseph; Mark Fung
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2020-09-18

9.  "Cervical cancer screening: awareness is not enough". Understanding barriers to screening among women in West Cameroon-a qualitative study using focus groups.

Authors:  Alida Manoëla Datchoua Moukam; Muriel Samartha Embolo Owono; Bruno Kenfack; Pierre Vassilakos; Patrick Petignat; Jessica Sormani; Nicole C Schmidt
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Population preferences for breast cancer screening policies: Discrete choice experiment in Belarus.

Authors:  Olena Mandrik; Alesya Yaumenenka; Rolando Herrero; Marcel F Jonker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.