| Literature DB >> 28977938 |
Qin Jin1, Fang Huang1, Xudong Wang2, Huijun Zhu1, Yun Xian3, Jieying Li1, Shu Zhang1, Qichao Ni4.
Abstract
Eg5 is a motor protein belonging to the kinesin-5 family and has been suggested to exert important function in tumors. In this study, we determined the mRNA and protein expression levels of Eg5 in cancerous and non-cancerous breast tissue by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and tissue microarray immunohistochemistry analysis (TMA-IHC) respectively. The results of 20 fresh-frozen BC samples demonstrated that Eg5 mRNA levels were significantly higher in BC tissues compared with corresponding non-cancerous tissue (p = 0.0009). TMA-IHC analysis in 127 BC tissues revealed that Eg5 expression obviously correlated with clinicopathologial parameters, including tumor grade (p = 0.004), ER status (p = 0.030), Ki67 status (p = 0.005), molecular classification (p = 0.026), N stage (p = 0.015), and TNM stage (p = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival curve indicated that high Eg5 expression (p = 0.012), Ki67 status (p = 0.014) and TNM stage (p = 0.026) were independent factors to predict poor prognosis for patients with breast cancer. Our data suggest that Eg5 is not only overexpressed in BC, it may be also served as a potential prognostic marker.Entities:
Keywords: BC; Eg5; prognosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28977938 PMCID: PMC5617498 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was employed to detect Eg5 mRNA expression levels in BC tissues and compared with corresponding non-cancerous tissues
When normalized to β-actin mRNA levels, the Eg5 mRNA level in BC tissue (0.8145 ± 0.1153) is significantly higher than that in corresponding non-cancerous tissue (0.3660 ± 0.0469).
Figure 2Representative images of Eg5 protein expression in BC and corresponding non-cancerous tissues with tissue microarray (TMA)
(a1, b1, a2 and b2) High IHC staining of Eg5 in the cytoplasm of invasive breast cancer cells. (c1 and c2) Low IHC staining of Eg5 in the cytoplasm of invasive breast cancer cells. (d1 and d2) No IHC staining of Eg5 in the invasive ductal breast cancer cells. (e1 and e2) No IHC staining of Eg5 in the breast ductal papilloma cells. (f1 and f2) No IHC staining of Eg5 in the breast adenosis cells. Original magnification ×40 in (a1, b1, c1, d1, e1, f1); ×400 in (a2, b2, c2, d2, e2, f2).
Association of Eg5 expression with clinical characteristics and selected biological markers of BC
| Characteristic | n | Eg5 expression(%) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low or no | High | ||||
| 0.688 | 0.749 | ||||
| ≤40 | 9 | 4 (44.4) | 5 (55.6) | ||
| 40-60 | 76 | 30 (39.5) | 46 (60.5) | ||
| ≥60 | 42 | 20 (47.6) | 22 (52.4) | ||
| 1.760 | 0.185 | ||||
| ≤2cm | 57 | 21 (36.8) | 36 (63.2) | ||
| >2cm | 70 | 34 (48.6) | 36 (51.4) | ||
| 8.345 | |||||
| I-II | 78 | 41 (52.6) | 37 (47.4) | ||
| III | 49 | 13(26. 5) | 36 (73.5) | ||
| 4.701 | |||||
| Negative | 43 | 24 (55.8) | 19 (44.2) | ||
| Positive | 84 | 30 (35.7) | 54 (64.3) | ||
| 0.747 | 0.387 | ||||
| Negative | 72 | 33 (45.8) | 39 (54.2) | ||
| Positive | 55 | 21 (38.2) | 34 (61.8) | ||
| 0.181 | 0.670 | ||||
| Negative | 82 | 36 (43.9) | 46 (56.1) | ||
| Positive | 45 | 18 (40.0) | 27 (60.0) | ||
| 7.850 | |||||
| Low | 57 | 32 (56.1) | 25 (43.9) | ||
| High | 70 | 22 (31.4) | 48 (68.6) | ||
| 9.280 | |||||
| Luminal A | 46 | 20 (43.5) | 26 (56.5) | ||
| Luminal B | 38 | 10 (26.3) | 28 (73.7) | ||
| Her2-overexpression | 29 | 14 (48.3) | 15(51.7) | ||
| TNBC | 14 | 10 (71.4) | 4 (28.6) | ||
| 5.952 | |||||
| N0 | 48 | 27 (56.2) | 21 (43.8) | ||
| N1+2+3 | 79 | 27 (34.2) | 52 (65.8) | ||
| 11.153 | |||||
| Stage I-II | 88 | 46 (52.3) | 42 (47.7) | ||
| Stage III | 39 | 8 (20.5) | 31 (79.5) | ||
*p < 0.05
Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in BC for 5-year overall survival
| Years | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||
| High vs low or no expression | 5 | 1.908 | 1.238-2.943 | 1.724 | 1.028-2.635 | ||
| ≤40 vs 40-60 versus ≥60 | 5 | 1.194 | 0.342 | 0.828-1.722 | |||
| I- II vs III | 5 | 1.208 | 0.378 | 0.793-1.840 | |||
| ≤2cm vs>2cm | 5 | 1.093 | 0.675 | 0.720-1.661 | |||
| Negative vs Positive | 5 | 0.768 | 0.225 | 0.504-1.171 | |||
| Negative vs Positive | 5 | 0.696 | 0.104 | 0.450-1.078 | |||
| Negative vs Positive | 5 | 1.705 | 1.116-2.605 | ||||
| Low vs High | 5 | 2.473 | 1.580-3.869 | 1.837 | 1.128-2.991 | ||
| Luminal A vs Luminal B vs Her2-overexpression vs TNBC | 5 | 1.184 | 0.073 | 0.985-1.423 | |||
| N0 vs N1+2+3 | 5 | 1.048 | 0.831 | 0.684-1.604 | |||
| Stage I- II vs Stage III | 5 | 2.036 | 1.502-3.539 | 1.676 | 1.063-2.642 | ||
*p < 0.05
Figure 3Survival analysis of BC patients by Kaplan-Meier method
(A) Overall survival rate in BC patients with high cytoplasmic expression of Eg5 (green line) was statistically lower than that in BC patients with low and no Eg5 expression (blue line). (B) Overall survival rate in BC patients with high Ki67 expression (green line) was statistically lower than that in BC patients with low Ki67 expression (blue line). (C) Overall survival rate in BC patients with advanced TNM stage III (green line) was statistically lower than that in BC patients with early TNM stage I-II (blue line).