Literature DB >> 28976912

PET performance evaluation of MADPET4: a small animal PET insert for a 7 T MRI scanner.

Negar Omidvari1, Jorge Cabello, Geoffrey Topping, Florian R Schneider, Stephan Paul, Markus Schwaiger, Sibylle I Ziegler.   

Abstract

MADPET4 is the first small animal PET insert with two layers of individually read out crystals in combination with silicon photomultiplier technology. It has a novel detector arrangement, in which all crystals face the center of field of view transaxially. In this work, the PET performance of MADPET4 was evaluated and compared to other preclinical PET scanners using the NEMA NU 4 measurements, followed by imaging a mouse-size hot-rod resolution phantom and two in vivo simultaneous PET/MRI scans in a 7 T MRI scanner. The insert had a peak sensitivity of 0.49%, using an energy threshold of 350 keV. A uniform transaxial resolution was obtained up to 15 mm radial offset from the axial center, using filtered back-projection with single-slice rebinning. The measured average radial and tangential resolutions (FWHM) were 1.38 mm and 1.39 mm, respectively. The 1.2 mm rods were separable in the hot-rod phantom using an iterative image reconstruction algorithm. The scatter fraction was 7.3% and peak noise equivalent count rate was 15.5 kcps at 65.1 MBq of activity. The FDG uptake in a mouse heart and brain were visible in the two in vivo simultaneous PET/MRI scans without applying image corrections. In conclusion, the insert demonstrated a good overall performance and can be used for small animal multi-modal research applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28976912     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa910d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of Hamamatsu PET imaging modules for dedicated TOF-capable scanners.

Authors:  A Stolin; G Jaliparthi; R R Raylman; J Brefczynski-Lewis; S Majewski; J Qi; K Gong; S Dolinsky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01-23

2.  Optimization of a depth of interaction encoding PET block detector for a PET/MRI insert.

Authors:  Aaron R Selfridge; Simon R Cherry; Martin S Judenhofer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Design, evaluation and initial imaging results of a PET insert based on strip-line readout for simultaneous PET/MRI.

Authors:  H Kim; Y Hua; H-T Chen; H-M Tsai; C-T Chen; G Karczmar; X Fan; D Xi; Q Xie; C-Y Chou; C-M Kao
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 1.455

4.  Performance evaluation of the mouse version of the LabPET II PET scanner.

Authors:  Émilie Gaudin; Christian Thibaudeau; Louis Arpin; Jean-Daniel Leroux; Maxime Toussaint; Jean-Francois Beaudoin; Jules Cadorette; Maxime Paillé; Catherine M Pepin; Konin Koua; Jonathan Bouchard; Nicolas Viscogliosi; Caroline Paulin; Réjean Fontaine; Roger Lecomte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Evaluation of the PETsys TOFPET2 ASIC in multi-channel coincidence experiments.

Authors:  Vanessa Nadig; David Schug; Bjoern Weissler; Volkmar Schulz
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-03-24

Review 6.  Recent Technical Advances in Accelerating the Clinical Translation of Small Animal Brain Imaging: Hybrid Imaging, Deep Learning, and Transcriptomics.

Authors:  Wuwei Ren; Bin Ji; Yihui Guan; Lei Cao; Ruiqing Ni
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 7.  A guideline proposal for mice preparation and care in 18F-FDG PET imaging.

Authors:  F M Ribeiro; P M M Correia; A C Santos; J F C A Veloso
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.434

8.  Comments on the NEMA NU 4-2008 Standard on Performance Measurement of Small Animal Positron Emission Tomographs.

Authors:  Patrick Hallen; David Schug; Volkmar Schulz
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-02-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.