Chan Shen1,2, Bo Zhao1, Lei Liu3, Ya-Chen Tina Shih1. 1. Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 2. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) improve the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) dramatically; however, nonadherence to TKI therapy may lead to resistance to the therapy. TKIs are very expensive and are covered under Part D insurance for Medicare patients. To the authors' knowledge, the impact of low-income subsidy status and cost sharing on adherence among this group has not been well studied in the literature. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data linked with Medicare Part D data from the years 2007 through 2012 were used in the current study. The authors identified 836 patients with CML with Medicare Part D insurance coverage who were new TKI users. Treatment nonadherence was defined as a binary variable indicating the percentage of days covered was <80% during the 180-day period after the initiation of TKI therapy. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between out-of-pocket costs per 30-day drug supply, Medicare Part D plan characteristics, and treatment adherence while controlling for other patient characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 244 of the 836 patients with CML (29%) were nonadherent to targeted oral therapy during the 180 days after the initiation of treatment with TKIs. The multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that patients with heavily subsidized (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-15.9) and moderately subsidized (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-6.5) Medicare Part D plans were much more likely to demonstrate nonadherence compared with patients without a subsidy. CONCLUSIONS: The current population-based study found a significantly higher rate of nonadherence among heavily subsidized patients with substantially lower out-of-pocket costs, which suggests that future research is needed to help lower the nonadherence rate among these individuals. Cancer 2018;124:364-73.
BACKGROUND:Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) improve the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) dramatically; however, nonadherence to TKI therapy may lead to resistance to the therapy. TKIs are very expensive and are covered under Part D insurance for Medicare patients. To the authors' knowledge, the impact of low-income subsidy status and cost sharing on adherence among this group has not been well studied in the literature. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data linked with Medicare Part D data from the years 2007 through 2012 were used in the current study. The authors identified 836 patients with CML with Medicare Part D insurance coverage who were new TKI users. Treatment nonadherence was defined as a binary variable indicating the percentage of days covered was <80% during the 180-day period after the initiation of TKI therapy. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between out-of-pocket costs per 30-day drug supply, Medicare Part D plan characteristics, and treatment adherence while controlling for other patient characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 244 of the 836 patients with CML (29%) were nonadherent to targeted oral therapy during the 180 days after the initiation of treatment with TKIs. The multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that patients with heavily subsidized (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.8-15.9) and moderately subsidized (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-6.5) Medicare Part D plans were much more likely to demonstrate nonadherence compared with patients without a subsidy. CONCLUSIONS: The current population-based study found a significantly higher rate of nonadherence among heavily subsidized patients with substantially lower out-of-pocket costs, which suggests that future research is needed to help lower the nonadherence rate among these individuals. Cancer 2018;124:364-73.
Authors: Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini; Laura Antolini; François-Xavier Mahon; Francois Guilhot; Michael Deininger; Carmen Fava; Arnon Nagler; Chiara Maria Della Casa; Enrica Morra; Elisabetta Abruzzese; Anna D'Emilio; Fabio Stagno; Philipp le Coutre; Rafael Hurtado-Monroy; Valeria Santini; Bruno Martino; Fabrizio Pane; Andrea Piccin; Pilar Giraldo; Sarit Assouline; Muheez A Durosinmi; Onno Leeksma; Enrico Maria Pogliani; Miriam Puttini; Eunjung Jang; Josy Reiffers; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Dong-Wook Kim Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Jalpa A Doshi; Pengxiang Li; Hairong Huo; Amy R Pettit; Rishab Kumar; Brenda M Weiss; Scott F Huntington Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Adam Gater; Louise Heron; Linda Abetz-Webb; John Coombs; Jeff Simmons; François Guilhot; Delphine Rea Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Haiden A Huskamp; Patricia A Deverka; Arnold M Epstein; Robert S Epstein; Kimberly A McGuigan; Anna C Muriel; Richard G Frank Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-04
Authors: Dana P Goldman; Geoffrey F Joyce; Jose J Escarce; Jennifer E Pace; Matthew D Solomon; Marianne Laouri; Pamela B Landsman; Steven M Teutsch Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-05-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lonneke Timmers; Christel C L M Boons; Mathieu Verbrugghe; Bart J F van den Bemt; Ann Van Hecke; Jacqueline G Hugtenburg Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Nancy L Keating; Gabriel A Brooks; Mary Beth Landrum; Pang-Hsiang Liu; Robert Wolf; Lauren E Riedel; Nirav S Kapadia; Shalini Jhatakia; Amanda Tripp; Carol Simon; Van Doren Hsu; Colleen M Kummet; Andrea Hassol Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Deborah R Kaye; Lauren E Wilson; Melissa A Greiner; Lisa P Spees; Jessica E Pritchard; Tian Zhang; Craig E Pollack; Daniel George; Charles D Scales; Chris D Baggett; Cary P Gross; Michael S Leapman; Stephanie B Wheeler; Michaela A Dinan Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Jessica E Pritchard; Lauren E Wilson; Samuel M Miller; Melissa A Greiner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Deborah R Kaye; Tian Zhang; Michaela A Dinan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 7.538