Literature DB >> 28975529

Pulse contour analysis of arterial waveform in a high fidelity human patient simulator.

Paolo Persona1, Elisabetta Saraceni2, Francesca Facchin3, Enrico Petranzan2, Matteo Parotto4, Fabio Baratto2, Carlo Ori3, Sandra Rossi2.   

Abstract

The measurement of cardiac output (CO) may be useful to improve the assessment of hemodynamics during simulated scenarios. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of introducing an uncalibrated pulse contour device (MostCare, Vytech, Vygon, Padova, Italy) into the simulation environment. MostCare device was plugged to a clinical monitor and connected to the METI human patient simulator (HPS) to obtain a continuous arterial waveform analysis and CO calculation. In six different simulated clinical scenarios (baseline, ventricular failure, vasoplegic shock, hypertensive crisis, hypovolemic shock and aortic stenosis), the HPS-CO and the MostCare-CO were simultaneously recorded. The level of concordance between the two methods was assessed by the Bland and Altman analysis. 150-paired CO values were obtained. The HPS-CO values ranged from 2.3 to 6.6 L min-1 and the MostCare-CO values from 2.8 to 6.4 L min-1. The mean difference between HPS-CO and MostCare-CO was - 0.3 L min-1 and the limits of agreement were - 1.5 and 0.9 L min-1. The percentage of error was 23%. A good correlation between HPS-CO and MostCare-CO was observed in each scenario of the study (r = 0.88). Although MostCare-CO tended to underestimate the CO over the study period, good agreements were found between the two methods. Therefore, a pulse contour device can be integrated into the simulation environment, offering the opportunity to create new simulated clinical settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haemodynamic monitoring; Human patient simulator; MostCare; Simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28975529     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-0066-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of four airway training manikins as patient simulators for the insertion of eight types of supraglottic airway devices.

Authors:  K M Jackson; T M Cook
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 2.  Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (Flotrac/Vigileo) in haemodynamically unstable patients.

Authors:  F D Compton; B Zukunft; C Hoffmann; W Zidek; J-H Schaefer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  Cardiac output monitoring.

Authors:  Eric E C de Waal; Frank Wappler; Wolfgang F Buhre
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.706

4.  Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans.

Authors:  Salvatore M Romano; Massimo Pistolesi
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  Simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G R Lorello; D A Cook; R L Johnson; R Brydges
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Comparison Between Doppler-Echocardiography and Uncalibrated Pulse Contour Method for Cardiac Output Measurement: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Sabino Scolletta; Federico Franchi; Stefano Romagnoli; Rossella Carlà; Abele Donati; Lea P Fabbri; Francesco Forfori; José M Alonso-Iñigo; Silvia Laviola; Valerio Mangani; Giulia Maj; Giampaolo Martinelli; Lucia Mirabella; Andrea Morelli; Paolo Persona; Didier Payen
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

Authors:  A F Connors; T Speroff; N V Dawson; C Thomas; F E Harrell; D Wagner; N Desbiens; L Goldman; A W Wu; R M Califf; W J Fulkerson; H Vidaillet; S Broste; P Bellamy; J Lynn; W A Knaus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

Authors:  S Barry Issenberg; William C McGaghie; Emil R Petrusa; David Lee Gordon; Ross J Scalese
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 9.  Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; Paolo Pelosi; Rupert Pearse; Didier Payen; Azriel Perel; Andreas Hoeft; Stefano Romagnoli; V Marco Ranieri; Carole Ichai; Patrice Forget; Giorgio Della Rocca; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.

Authors:  Sujanthy S Rajaram; Nayan K Desai; Ankur Kalra; Mithil Gajera; Susan K Cavanaugh; William Brampton; Duncan Young; Sheila Harvey; Kathy Rowan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28
View more
  2 in total

1.  Simulating Radial Pressure Waveforms with a Mock Circulatory Flow Loop to Characterize Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Anna Packy; Gavin A D'Souza; Masoud Farahmand; Luke Herbertson; Christopher G Scully
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.305

Review 2.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.