Literature DB >> 26215467

Effectiveness of Lateral Bone Augmentation on the Alveolar Crest Dimension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

I Sanz-Sánchez1, A Ortiz-Vigón1, I Sanz-Martín1, E Figuero2, M Sanz3.   

Abstract

Lateral ridge augmentation procedures are aimed to reconstruct deficient alveolar ridges or to build up peri-implant dehiscence and fenestrations. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of these interventions by analyzing data from 40 clinical studies evaluating bone augmentation through either the staged or the simultaneous approach. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guideline for systematic reviews was used. The primary outcomes were the changes at reentry, in the ridge width, and in the vertical and horizontal dimensions of the peri-implant defect, measured in millimeters, in the staged and simultaneous approaches, respectively. The results of the meta-analysis showed, for the simultaneous approach, a statistically significant defect height reduction when all treatments were analyzed together (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -4.28 mm; 95% confidence interval: [CI] -4.88, -3.69; P < 0.01). The intervention combining bone replacement grafts with barrier membranes was associated with superior outcomes The most frequently used intervention was the combination of xenograft and bioabsorbable membrane. Similarly, for the staged approach, there was a statistically significant horizontal gain when all treatment groups were combined (WMD = 3.90 mm; 95% CI: 3.52, 4.28; P < 0.001). The most frequently used intervention was the use of autogenous bone blocks. Both treatment strategies led to high survival and success rates (>95%) for the implants placed on the regenerated sites. Nonexposed sites gained significantly more in the simultaneous and staged approaches (WMD = 1.1 and 3.1 mm). © International & American Associations for Dental Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alveolar bone loss; alveolar ridge augmentation; bone regeneration; bone substitutes; bone transplantation; dental implant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26215467     DOI: 10.1177/0022034515594780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  27 in total

1.  Comparative release of growth factors from PRP, PRF, and advanced-PRF.

Authors:  Eizaburo Kobayashi; Laura Flückiger; Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Kosaku Sawada; Anton Sculean; Benoit Schaller; Richard J Miron
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Contour changes after guided bone regeneration of large non-contained mandibular buccal bone defects using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a porcine-derived collagen membrane: an experimental in vivo investigation.

Authors:  I Sanz-Martin; L Ferrantino; F Vignoletti; J Nuñez; N Baldini; M Duvina; J Alcaraz; M Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Primary bone augmentation leads to equally stable marginal tissue conditions comparing the use of xenograft blocks infused with BMP-2 and autogenous bone blocks: A 3D analysis after 3 years.

Authors:  Stefan P Bienz; Michael Payer; Jenni Hjerppe; Jürg Hüsler; Norbert Jakse; Patrick R Schmidlin; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 5.021

Review 4.  Regenerative Medicine for Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases.

Authors:  L Larsson; A M Decker; L Nibali; S P Pilipchuk; T Berglundh; W V Giannobile
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Bone defect rehabilitation using lyophilized bone preshaped on a stereolithographic model.

Authors:  Lauren Oliveira Lima Bohner; Eduardo Mukai; Sueli Mukai; Pedro Tortamano; Newton Sesma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

6.  Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement.

Authors:  Alberto Ortiz-Vigón; Sergio Martinez-Villa; Iñaki Suarez; Fabio Vignoletti; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-06-21

7.  A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure.

Authors:  Bastian Wessing; Istvan Urban; Eduardo Montero; Werner Zechner; Markus Hof; Javier Alández Chamorro; Nuria Alández Martin; Giovanni Polizzi; Silvio Meloni; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  A randomized, controlled, multicentre clinical trial of post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation.

Authors:  Eric Todd Scheyer; Rick Heard; Jim Janakievski; George Mandelaris; Marc L Nevins; Stephen R Pickering; Christopher R Richardson; Bryan Pope; Gregory Toback; Diego Velásquez; Heiner Nagursky
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 8.728

9.  Mucosal Perfusion Preservation by a Novel Shapeable Tissue Expander for Oral Reconstruction.

Authors:  Daria Barwinska; John Garner; Darrell D Davidson; Todd G Cook; George J Eckert; Sunil S Tholpady; Keith L March; Kinam Park; Clark T Barco
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-08-28

10.  Effects of platelet rich plasma (PRP) on human gingival fibroblast, osteoblast and periodontal ligament cell behaviour.

Authors:  Eizaburo Kobayashi; Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Anton Sculean; Vivianne Chappuis; Daniel Buser; Benoit Schaller; Ferenc Dőri; Richard J Miron
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.