Erkin Kuru1,2, Carey Lambert3, Jonathan Rittichier4,2, Rob Till3, Adrien Ducret5,6, Adeline Derouaux7,8, Joe Gray7, Jacob Biboy7, Waldemar Vollmer7, Michael VanNieuwenhze4, Yves V Brun5, R Elizabeth Sockett9. 1. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Department, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. 2. Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. 3. Department of Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. 4. School of Life Sciences, Nottingham University, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. 5. Department of Chemistry, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. 6. Bases Moléculaires et Structurales des Systèmes Infectieux, IBCP, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5086, 7 passage du Vercors, 69367, Lyon Cedex 07, France. 7. The Centre for Bacterial Cell Biology, Baddiley Clark Building, Medical School, Newcastle University, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. 8. Xpress Biologics, Tour GIGA B34 (+3), Avenue de l'Hôpital, 11, B-4000, Liège (Sart-Tilman), Belgium. 9. Department of Biology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. liz.sockett@nottingham.ac.uk.
Abstract
Modification of essential bacterial peptidoglycan (PG)-containing cell walls can lead to antibiotic resistance; for example, β-lactam resistance by L,D-transpeptidase activities. Predatory Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus are naturally antibacterial and combat infections by traversing, modifying and finally destroying walls of Gram-negative prey bacteria, modifying their own PG as they grow inside prey. Historically, these multi-enzymatic processes on two similar PG walls have proved challenging to elucidate. Here, with a PG-labelling approach utilizing timed pulses of multiple fluorescent D-amino acids, we illuminate dynamic changes that predator and prey walls go through during the different phases of bacteria:bacteria invasion. We show formation of a reinforced circular port-hole in the prey wall, L,D-transpeptidaseBd-mediated D-amino acid modifications strengthening prey PG during Bdellovibrio invasion, and a zonal mode of predator elongation. This process is followed by unconventional, multi-point and synchronous septation of the intracellular Bdellovibrio, accommodating odd- and even-numbered progeny formation by non-binary division.
Modification of essential bacterial peptidoglycan (PG)-containing cell walls can lead to antibiotic resistance; for example, β-lactam resistance by L,D-transpeptidase activities. Predatory Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus are naturally antibacterial and combat infections by traversing, modifying and finally destroying walls of Gram-negative prey bacteria, modifying their own PG as they grow inside prey. Historically, these multi-enzymatic processes on two similar PG walls have proved challenging to elucidate. Here, with a PG-labelling approach utilizing timed pulses of multiple fluorescent D-amino acids, we illuminate dynamic changes that predator and prey walls go through during the different phases of bacteria:bacteria invasion. We show formation of a reinforced circular port-hole in the prey wall, L,D-transpeptidaseBd-mediated D-amino acid modifications strengthening prey PG during Bdellovibrio invasion, and a zonal mode of predator elongation. This process is followed by unconventional, multi-point and synchronous septation of the intracellular Bdellovibrio, accommodating odd- and even-numbered progeny formation by non-binary division.
Peptidoglycan (PG) is a shape-determining macromolecule common to the bacterial
domain. The mature PG wall of bacteria is made by glycan polymerization and peptide
crosslinking of a D-amino acid-rich muramyl pentapeptide subunit (Figure 1a). These crosslinks give the PG wall its essential
load-bearing properties against the bacterial cell’s turgor pressure and are made
in two basic ways; either 3-4 crosslinks catalysed by normally essential and common
Penicillin Binding Proteins (PBP) or 3-3 crosslinks catalysed by normally disposable,
variable, L,D-transpeptidases (Ldt) (Figure
1b)1.
Figure 1
a- Biosynthesis of PG starts in the cytoplasm by sequential addition
of L-Ala, D-Glu, a diamino acid and a dipeptide of D-Ala-D-Ala to disaccharide
units. This subunit is then incorporated into the murein sacculus by glycan
polymerisation via transglycosylases. The D-Ala at position 5 can also be
cleaved by the actions of D,D-carboxypeptidases. b-
L,D-transpeptidases cleave the D-Ala from position 4 and utilise the energy from
cleaving this bond to form a 3-3 crosslink with another acyl-acceptor stem
peptide or replace the D-Ala with a free D-amino acid such as fluorescent
D-amino acids (FDAAs). c - Timed stages of the predatory cycle of
B. bacteriovorus (black) bacteria invading E.
coli prey (gray). 0-15 minutes post-mixing of B.
bacteriovorus and prey; B. bacteriovorus attach
and begin to enter the outer layers of the prey. 30 minutes; most of the
B. bacteriovorus have entered the prey periplasm, modifying
the prey cell to form a rounded “bdelloplast”. 1-3 hours;
B. bacteriovorus growth occurs at the expense of the prey
cell contents in the form of elongation as a filament. 4 hours; this filament
fragments into smaller attack phase cells which break out from the bdelloplast
d- FDAAs used in this study, colours are representative of
emission maxima. e- Multi-coloured FDAA labelling scheme with time
points observed by wide field epifluorescence microscopy. Predator and prey
cells were pre-labelled separately with BADA and TADA respectively before being
washed and then mixed. Samples of the mixed infection were then pulse-labelled
with HADA for 10 minutes before each time point before being fixed, washed, then
microscopically observed. f- Phase contrast and epi-fluorescent
microscopy images of the early stages of B. bacteriovorus
predation The B. bacteriovorus are false-coloured in green, the
E. coli prey cells are false-coloured in red and pulsed
HADA signal is false-coloured in blue. Each channel is displayed independently
in white and with all 3 fluorescence channels merged in epifluorescence (EPI)
overlay. HADA fluorescence signal on the prey wall has an intense focus at each
point of B. bacteriovorus contact and spreads from this point
across the rest of the wall. The two images are representative of between 321
and 10,546 cells for each timepoint, detailed in Supplementary Table
1.
Although PBPs and Ldts are evolutionarily and structurally distinct
transpeptidases, research in diverse bacteria showed that both enzyme types can exchange
a range of naturally occurring D-amino acids (DAAs) with the 5th and
4th position D-alanines in the peptide stems of PG subunits,
respectively2–4 (Figure 1b). Such exchanges
are associated with changes in a variety of biophysical properties of the wall5,6, in
particular the strength (as determined by osmolarity challenge2,7) in some bacteria.
Substrate promiscuity of these transpeptidases toward a diverse set of DAAs8 has allowed the development of fluorescent D-amino
acids (FDAAs) and their implementation as a means to visualize PG dynamics in
situ9–12Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus (approximately 1.0 x 0.3 µm)
prey upon (larger) Gram-negative bacterial species by breaching the prey outer-membrane,
residing in the modified prey periplasm (forming the “bdelloplast”),
resealing and growing within13,14, before finally bursting out to invade more prey
(Figure 1c). The prey are killed some 20
minutes into predation when electron transport ceases as predator molecules pass across
the prey inner membrane15, however the prey
bdelloplast is kept intact for 4 hours to allow “private dining” and
consumption of prey contents by the predator. Early electron microscopic work16,17 led to
the assumptions that the invading B. bacteriovorus would squeeze
through the outer layers of the prey bacterium, degrading some type of entry pore in the
prey PG containing cell wall, re-sealing this, and modifying the rest of the prey PG.
However, as the biochemically similar walls were obscured at the points of contact
between the two bacterial cells, this bi-cellular multi-enzymatic process has, until
now, been difficult to analyse. Therefore, other than recent work showing the mechanisms
of prey cell rounding20, self-protection from
auto-rounding18,19 and marking of the wall for later destruction20
B. bacteriovorus wall invasion dynamics and cell biology have remained
subjects of conjecture.Here, we combine three differently coloured FDAAs9 in a timed series (Figure 1d-e) to
illuminate dynamic PG modifications during bacterial predation, simultaneously in two
bacterial species. 3D- Structured Illumination Microscopy (3D-SIM), resolved the
B. bacteriovorus processes of :- i) breaching the prey PG, ii)
constructing a reinforced porthole in the prey cell wall, iii) resealing the porthole
after entry, iv) modifying the prey PG with L,D-transpeptidases, and v) eventually
achieving filamentous, intra-bacterial zonal cell growth and synchronous, multi-site
septation.
Results
Multi-colour FDAA microscopy reveals prey versus predator cell wall
modifications during invasion
A synchronous predatory invasion co-culture of E. coli
prey cells pre labelled with a red FDAA, TADA, and B.
bacteriovorus predator cells pre-labelled with a green FDAA, BADA,
was established, and this invasive culture was further pulse-labelled with a
blue FDAA, HADA, for 10 minutes at key points during the predation process. The
cells were then fixed, washed, and imaged (Figure
1e).Total cell wall fluorescence of now-dead prey cells (TADA) showed no
appreciable change through the invasive process (Supplementary Figure 1);
however, both labelling patterns and signal intensities of pulsed HADA
fluorescence showed dramatic differences depending on the stage of
predation.HADA pulses early in the infection, 15 or 30 minutes post-mixing of
predators with prey resulted in labelling of various sub-cellular features. In
particular, intense, localised, focal HADA marks on the prey PG (and a gradient
of HADA signal from that focal point) were seen associated with attached
B. bacteriovorus cells revealing the entry point of the
B. bacteriovorus during the earliest predator-prey
interaction (Figure 1f).In order to further characterize these sub-cellular features in early
predation, we imaged these labelled cells with high
resolution 3D Structured Illumination Microscopy (3D-SIM). 3D-SIM resolved most
of these focal marks of HADA labelling as annular ring structures (~%25
of all HADA-bright prey cells investigated at earliest predation point, Figure 2, Supplementary Table 2 and
Supplementary Movie
1) having a width (~0.24 µm; Supplementary Table 2)
slightly less than that of a B. bacteriovorus cell (~
0.33 µm) at the point of predator invasive cell pole : prey contact. This
is consistent with the B. bacteriovorus ‘squeezing
through the entry pore’ idea suggested by electron micrographs in earlier
work16,21,22. Therefore,
these HADA foci likely indicate the specific modification of the prey cell wall
by predator during entry (Figure 2a). The
ring of HADA modification was on the prey PG rather than the predator as it
appeared to be at the point of prey PG with predator on the outside, inside, or
partially entering the prey cell (Supplementary Figure 2 a-c). Furthermore, rare instances
were observed where the predator had become detached from the prey but the HADA
foci were still visible, confirming that these foci were indeed on the prey PG
(Supplementary Figure
2-d).
Figure 2
3D-SIM images of early predation by B. bacteriovorus
(pre-labelled with BADA, false-coloured red) on prey E. coli
cells after a pulse labelling for 10 minutes with HADA (false-coloured cyan) to
show early modification of cell walls. a- Predation 15 minutes post
mixing reveals a ring of HADA-labelled prey cell wall modification at the point
of B. bacteriovorus contact (arrowheads) and of similar width
to the B. bacteriovorus cell (see Supplementary Table 2).
Central pores in the labelled PG material can be seen where the B.
bacteriovorus image is artificially removed from the overlay of the
two channels. Such annuli may represent a thickened ring of PG modification. In
the white inset; the lookup table for the BADA channel has been separately
adjusted until all the BADA labelled predators were clearly visible. Three
representative examples are displayed. b- Prey PG is deformed
around the site of B. bacteriovorus invasion (arrowheads).
c- The cells show HADA fluorescence at the end of the internal
B. bacteriovorus cell (arrowheads) which likely represents
transpeptidase activity re-sealing the hole in the prey PG after the B.
bacteriovorus cell has entered. Images are representative of
>100 3D-reconstructed cells in two independent experiments (Supplementary Table 2 for
details of numbers analysed). Scale bars are 1µm.
To establish that the dark channel in the HADA focal mark was indeed an
entry pore in the prey PG we needed to detect the reduction of prey-PG material
at the HADA channel centre. Using a more outer-membrane permeable E.
coli imp4213- mutant strain as an alternative prey
allowed us to label the prey PG uniformly and more completely with otherwise
poorly outer-membrane permeable TADA9. In
these cells, dark pores in the TADA signal (arrowheads TADA channel Figure 3a) were present, coincident with, and
central within, the HADA ring (Figure 3a
and Supplementary Table
3). These results represent a direct observation of B.
bacteriovorus generating a ringed pore in the prey PG; a process
that had previously been only inferred from indirect evidence16,22,23.
Figure 3
3D-SIM images of early predation by B. bacteriovorus
(pre-labelled with BADA, false-coloured green) on prey E. coli
imp4213 cells (which are more permeable and thus susceptible to the
TADA pre-labelling, false coloured in red) after a pulse labelling for 10
minutes with HADA (false-coloured cyan) to show early modification of cell
walls. a- FDAA labelling scheme (using excess B.
bacteriovorus to promote synchronous invasion of E.
coli Δimp4213 mutant prey) with time points
observed by 3D-SIM fluorescence microscopy. Predator and prey cells were
pre-labelled separately with BADA and TADA respectively before being washed and
then mixed. Samples of the mixed infection were then pulse-labelled with HADA
for 10 minutes before time points up to 30 minutes, the cells were fixed, washed
and then microscopically observed. b- Predation 30 minutes post
mixing with this prey strain reveals a pore in the TADA signal coincident with
the ring of HADA-labelled prey cell wall modification at the point of B.
bacteriovorus contact (arrowheads) and of similar width to the
B. bacteriovorus cell (Supplementary Table 3).
c- In several cases (Supplementary Table 3) where the B.
bacteriovorus cell had entered into the prey cell and established
itself in the periplasm of the bdelloplast, the pore in the TADA was coincident
with a patch of HADA- and thus is likely to represent the sealing of the pore
through which the B. bacteriovorus had entered. Images are
representative of two independent experimental repeats. Scale bars are 1
µm.
Our approach also allowed us to distinguish clear deformations of the
prey cell wall at the point where the B. bacteriovorus cell had
entered (arrowheads, Figure 2b, arrowheads
HADA channel Supplementary
Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 2) clarifying visually previous suggestions that
B. bacteriovorus enzymatic modifications of prey cell walls
may act to soften them18,24.To investigate dynamic changes in pores after invasion, we analysed
(Supplementary Table
2, Figure 2c and Supplementary Figure 2e),
~400 HADA labelled E. coli S17-1
bdelloplasts. In 27% of these containing
internalised
B. bacteriovorus there was a HADA ring similar to the entry
pore on bdelloplasts, located at the prey-predator contact point on the prey
wall-proximal pole of the internalised B. bacteriovorus cells
(red arrowheads, Supplementary
Figure 2e and Supplementary Table 2). In some cases (4%) the HADA patches were
filled discs (white arrowheads Figure 2c
and yellow arrowheads Supplementary Figure 2e). Such discs were also coincident with dark
pores in TADA label of E. coli imp4213 mutant bdelloplasts
(Figure 3c and Supplementary Table 3)
suggesting that they are sealing discs made by internalised B.
bacteriovorus to close the prey, keeping the bdelloplast intact for
predator consumption of contents.
B. bacteriovorus establishment inside prey is accompanied by
an L,D-transpeptidase-mediated prey wall modification
As the B. bacteriovorus cells enter the prey periplasm,
the prey cells become rounded (Figure 2a),
forming a bdelloplast13. During this
period, the extent of HADA incorporation to the whole
rounding wall of the (now dead) prey substantially increased and peaked around
45 min post-mixing, with ~2 to 4 times more HADA signal-intensity (blue
line, Figure 4a, see methods for details) than the mean HADA labelling at later
2, 3, and 4 hour predation time points.
Figure 4
Quantitative and qualitative effects of two L,D-transpeptidases on prey cell wall
modifications by FDAAs and their expression profiles. a- Plot of
mean HADA fluorescent signal of cells against time throughout the predation
cycle. Measurements are total mean background-corrected fluorescent signal from
wild type B. bacteriovorus cells (grey line),
Δ2ldt mutant (yellow line), or invaded prey
bdelloplast. Mean fluorescent signal was significantly lower in the bdelloplasts
invaded by the Δ2ldt mutant (orange line) compared to
those invaded by the wild type (blue line). Time is in minutes post-mixing of
predator and prey and fluorescence is in relative fluorescent units. Data were
from at least two independent repeats (see Supplementary Table 1 for
details of n). Error bars are SEM. The HADA signal differences between
E. coli preyed upon by wt or Δ2ldt
mutant were significant in each of the time points
(p<0.0001 **** for all time points except 240 min, for
which p=0.016 * by the Mann-Whitney test)
b- RT-PCR showing the expression of predicted L,D-transpeptidase
genes bd0886 and bd1176 or control gene
dnaK, over the predatory cycle of B.
bacteriovorus. . L = 100bp DNA ladder, AP = Attack Phase cells,
15-45, 1h-4h = minutes or hours respectively since mixing of B.
bacteriovorus and prey. Ec = E. coli S17-1 RNA
(negative control: no B. bacteriovorus); NT = no RNA control;
Gen = B. bacteriovorus HD100 genomic DNA (positive control).
The cartoon above represents the different stages of predation. Expression of
both genes peaked at 15-30 minutes post-mixing predator and prey. Two
independent repeats were carried out and showed the same transcription
pattern.
c- FDAA labelling of B. bacteriovorus wild-type
HD100 and d- Δ2ldt mutant predation and
bdelloplast establishment. White arrowheads point to HADA modification of the
bdelloplast and HADA polar foci visible on the mutant predators inside the
bdelloplast. The B. bacteriovorus are false-coloured green, the
E. coli prey cells are false-coloured red and the HADA
pulse-labelling is false-coloured blue. HADA fluorescence of the prey cell
during predation with the L,D-transpeptidase mutant is less than for predation
by the wild-type. Scale bars are 1 µm. Images are representative of 5
independent replicates for the wild-type and 2 independent replicates for the
Δ2Ldt mutant (Supplementary Table 1 for details of n).
Previous global transcriptomic work had shown that the predicted
B. bacteriovorus L,D-transpeptidase (Ldt) genes,
bd0886 and bd1176, are transcriptionally
upregulated at 30 minutes from the start of predation ~5- and 6-fold,
respectively25. These predicted
L,D-transpeptidases, therefore, are good candidates for prey wall modification
enzymes during bdelloplast establishment. RT-PCR analysis confirmed that the
expression of both genes peaked at 15-30 minutes into predation (Figure 4b); time points at which HADA
incorporation to the prey walls begins (blue line, Figure 4a). Deletion of both of these ldt genes
(leaving 17 ldt genes intact) resulted in a
Δbd0886Δbd1176 predator
(named Δ2ldt) that caused ~2-4 times less prey
HADA incorporation activity than the wild type (blue line vs. orange line, Figure 4a and representative images in Figure 4c vs. Figure 4d). This significant difference suggests that these two
B. bacteriovorus ldt gene products are responsible for the
majority of the overall HADA pulse incorporation into prey wall within the first
2 hours of predation. A C-terminal fusion of mCherry to one of these two Ldts
(Bd1176) localized to the prey bdelloplast, suggesting that this transpeptidase
was exported from predator to bdelloplast and so was acting on the
prey PG (Supplementary Figure 4).
Bdelloplast wall modification is largely by the action of B.
bacteriovorus enzymes which act upon uncrosslinked tetrapeptides of
the prey PG
In order to test the nature of the bdelloplast wall modification, we
quantified HADA incorporation in bdelloplasts formed by B.
bacteriovorus predation on different E. coli prey
lacking different PG modification functionalities. The prey strain E.
coli BW25113 Δ6LDT lacks all of the 6 E.
coli L,D-transpeptidases (and therefore any L,D-transpeptidation
activity). It lacks tripeptides, 3,3-crosslinks and PG-attached Lpp, and is rich
in tetrapeptides26,27. The prey strain E. coli BW25113
ΔdacA lacks the major E. coli D,D-carboxypeptidase DacA
and so contains more pentapeptides in its PG. The prey strain E.
coli BW25113 Δ6LDTΔdacA lacks all 6
L,D-transpeptidases and the D,D-carboxypeptidase DacA and so contains mainly
tetrapeptides, some pentapeptide, and lacks the modifications introduced by
L,D-transpeptidases. Compared to the wild type prey strain E.
coli BW25113 wt, predation of these strains by B.
bacteriovorus and pulse labelling with HADA at 35-45 minutes post
mixing of predator and prey, resulted in significantly more HADA incorporation
for both prey strains lacking the L,D-transpeptidase activity (Δ6LDT and
Δ6LDT ΔdacA, Figure 5a), but
with no significant difference for prey lacking DacA alone (Figure 5a). In the absence of B.
bacteriovorus predation, prey cells in Ca/HEPES buffer pulsed with
HADA showed a fraction of the HADA incorporation when compared to the prey
strains subjected to B. bacteriovorus predation
(~1.5-14.6% of HADA incorporation, controls versus +Bds, Figure 5a). The majority of the E.
coli self-labelling (in controls in the absence of B.
bacteriovorus
Figure 5a) was absent in the E.
coli BW25113 Δ6LDT showing the LdtEC to be
responsible for this small amount of labelling. That predation of this strain
actually resulted in more HADA incorporation further supports the notion that
this incorporation is by Bdellovibrio encoded enzymes rather
than those of the prey. Altogether, these results suggest that a significant
proportion of the strong HADA incorporation observed on the prey PG during
predation involves predator L,D-transpeptidase activity on tetrapeptides of the
prey bdelloplast PG (and not D,D-transpeptidase activity on pentapeptides).
These data, along with Bd1176-mCherry and Δ2ldt data
above, show that this activity comes from L,D-transpeptidases secreted by the
B. bacteriovorus and not due to lingering activities of
prey Ldt enzymes.
Figure 5
a- Chart of mean HADA fluorescent signal of prey strains preyed upon
by B. bacteriovorus (+Bd), and pulsed with HADA at 35-45
minutes post mixing (the timepoint of maximal HADA incorporation for E.
coli S17-1). Controls were in Ca/HEPES buffer without B.
bacteriovorus predation, but pulsed with HADA at the same
timepoint. Measurements are total mean background corrected fluorescent signal
of prey cells and is reported in relative fluorescent units measured by
MicrobeJ. Prey cells lacking all 6 L,D-transpeptidases (Δ6LDT)
accumulated more HADA fluorescence upon predation by B.
bacteriovorus. Control samples without B.
bacteriovorus predation accumulated considerably less HADA
fluorescence. Controls of Δ6LDT prey cells without
Bdellovibrio predation accumulated negligible HADA
fluorescence. Data were from two (for the controls) or three independent
repeats. Error bars are standard error of the means. WT- E.
coli BW25113 wild-type strain YB7421, 6LDT- E.
coli BW25113 Δ6LDT strain deficient in all 6 L,D
transpeptidases, dacA- E. coli BW25113 strain YB7423 deficient
in DacA, 6LDTdacA- E. coli BW25113
Δ6LDTΔdacA strain YB7439 deficient in all 6
L,D transpeptidases and dacA. N/S- not significant; all other comparisons were
significant p<0.0001, with the one exception shown, by
the Mann-Whitney test.
b- CPRG β-galactosidase assay measuring cytoplasmic leakage
of shocked E. coli bdelloplasts formed by wild type (BP HD100
WT) or bdelloplasts formed by Δ2ldt mutant B.
bacteriovorus (BP Ldt- mutant) with controls of uninvaded
E. coli prey cells (S17-1 only) or B.
bacteriovorus cells alone (HD100 WT only). Red colour from positive
CPRG reaction was measured by spectrophotometry at 574 nm and readings were
normalised to each experiment. Bdelloplasts were harvested by centrifugation and
shocked by resuspension in Ca/HEPES buffer for no shock- except centrifugation
only (Buffer), Ca/HEPES buffer supplemented with 750mM NaCl (Upshock) or upshock
followed by further centrifugation and resuspension in water (Downshock). Error
bars are standard error of the mean. Statistical significance was determined by
Student’s t-test (2-tailed)
*p<0.05 **p<0.01
***p<0.001. Data were the mean of 7 independent
repeats.
To determine the role of the L,D-transpeptidase activity, we assayed the
stability of bdelloplasts produced by wild type B.
bacteriovorus or by Δ2ldt mutant predator
under osmotic challenge using the β-galatosidase substrate chlorophenyl
red-β-D-galactopyranoside (CPRG) method to screen for damage to bacterial
cell walls28.Bdelloplasts, at the peak of Ldt FDAA transfer- 1 hour post-synchronous
infection of E. coli S17-1 (lac)
prey; were subjected to osmotic upshock or downshock29. We observed increased β-galactosidase activity
(Figure 5a) in the supernatant from
shocked bdelloplasts formed by Δ2ldt mutant predators
relative to wild-type in all conditions tested, including a small but
significant) increase in levels from bdelloplasts formed by
Δ2ldt predators, only subjected to the stress of
centrifugation and resuspension in buffer (Figure
5b). These data suggest that Bd0886 and Bd1176 L,D-transpeptidase
activities strengthen the bdelloplast wall to resist bursting during periods of
B. bacteriovorus predatory intra-bacterial growth, after
prey-entry.To investigate if this Ldt modification had any effect on the
bdelloplast morphology, we measured the sizes and shapes of the prey and
bdelloplasts. Early bdelloplasts (45-60 minutes) formed by the Ldt mutant
B. bacteriovorus were slightly, but significantly
(p<0.0001) less round than those formed by the
wild-type (Supplementary
Figure 5). We hypothesise that the less robust bdelloplasts formed by
the Ldt mutant result in more flexible walls that warped more by the invading
B. bacteriovorus cell, visible at the earlier stage of
invasion after the B. bacteriovorus cell squeezed into the full
prey cell. At later stages of invasion (2-4 hours) degradation of prey cell
content may be why the differences between bdelloplasts formed by the mutant or
the wild-type are no longer significant.
Multi-coloured FDAA labelling provides direct evidence for the zonal mode of
elongation and synchronous division of B. bacteriovorus growing
inside prey
B. bacteriovorus grow without binary fission, as a
single multi-nucleoid filament inside prey30. At later timepoints, after 2 hours post-mixing, we observed
filamentous cell elongation of the B. bacteriovorus within
bdelloplasts (Figure 6a)30. Attack phase (AP) B.
bacteriovorus were added in excess to ensure efficient predation in
our experiments and AP predator cells that did not enter prey can be seen to
retain substantial initial BADA labelling (Figures
6a and yellow arrowheads, 6b),
because they do not replicate outside prey. On the other hand, after 2-3 hour
inside prey, we observe some green BADA transfer into the prey bdelloplast
structure (BADA signal on bdelloplasts, Figure
6a) which may represent a predator-to-prey DAA turnover and transfer
event as the growing B. bacteriovorus make new PG during
elongation. While potentially fascinating, quantifying this inter-wall transfer
proved impossible to resolve with current reagents. The high level of BADA
accumulation appears more than from just one invading
Bdellovibrio and may be a slow prey accumulation of free
BADA present in the medium having been released from excess uninvading
Bdellovibrio due to self-peptidoglycan turnover and/or
releasing of BADA transiently accumulated in their cell envelopes. This pool of
free BADA would be present throughout the 4 hour predatory cycle and so could
incorporate into prey over a longer time compared to the 10 minute pulses of
HADA availability.
Figure 6
Phase contrast (a) and epi-fluorescent microscopy and 3D-SIM
(b-d) images of the later stages of B.
bacteriovorus predation (after the peak of bdelloplast HADA
labelling, by wild type predator, has ended). The B.
bacteriovorus were pre-labelled with BADA and are false-coloured in
green, the E. coli prey cells were pre-labelled with TADA and
are false-coloured in red. The cells were pulse-labelled for 10 minutes before
each acquisition timepoint with HADA, which is false-coloured in cyan. Each
channel is displayed independently and with all 3 fluorescence channels merged.
The HADA fluorescence indicates synthesis of the B.
bacteriovorus PG, which initiates at many points along the growing
predator (2 hours, b; red arrowheads) except the poles (2 hours;
b; green arrowheads), before developing into foci (3 hours;
c; red arrowheads), which become septa (4 hours;
d, red arrowhead). After division, newly released B.
bacteriovorus can be seen to modify their whole PG (4 hours;
d, white arrowheads). B. bacteriovorus that
did not invade (there was an excess of B. bacteriovorus to
ensure efficient predation) can be seen to have a strong BADA signal and low
HADA signal (4 hours; d, yellow arrowheads). Images are
representative examples from thousands of cells from five independent
experiments (a) and of >100 3D-reconstructed cells in two
independent experiments (b-d) see Supplementary Table 1 for
numbers of cells analysed. Scale bars are 1µm.
3D-SIM imaging showed that B. bacteriovorus cells
elongate along the filament with numerous, focused zones of growth (labelled
with HADA, red arrowheads, Figure 6b)
covering the entire cell surface except the apparently inert poles (preserving
the original BADA signal, green arrowheads, Figure
6b). Later, around 3 hours post-mixing, new HADA incorporation
appears as defined narrow foci along the filament (Figure 6a and red arrowheads 6c), at points in B. bacteriovorus where new division
septa would be expected to form synchronously30. After 4 hour post-mixing, these foci become the points of septum
formation (Figure 6a and yellow arrowheads
6d). Finally, newly released, attack
phase B. bacteriovorus daughter cells (white arrowheads, Figure 6d) incorporate pulsed HADA all over
the cell and can therefore be distinguished from excess BADA labelled predators
that didn’t enter prey cells by the presence of a strong HADA fluorescent
signal, but low BADA fluorescent signal.
Discussion
Here, using multi coloured FDAA labelling and super-resolution imaging, we
directly visualise sub-cellular modifications by B. bacteriovorus
on E. coli PG cell walls and their effects during predation. Our
data define an entry port structure by which a B. bacteriovorus
cell accesses the cytoplasmic membrane face of the prey cell wall and seals itself
in. We also show the sites of PG growth in the non-binary fission mode of predator
growth. In addition, we show that L,D-transpeptidase enzymes from the B.
bacteriovorus modify the PG of prey during residency of the predator to
establish a stable intracellular niche.Pioneering enzymology of prey bdelloplast extracts in the 1970s had detected
bulk enzyme activities suggestive of extensive predator-modification of prey PG.
These included solubilisation of 25% of the m-DAP residues on the
PG23 and the addition of free
m-DAP back to the bdelloplast31. m-DAP is a residue native to PG that has both L-
and D- amino acid properties. Therefore, we see FDAAs in our studies acting as
visible substrates for these enzymatic, fresco-like changes to the walls of invaded
prey caused by B. bacteriovorus enzymes. Indeed, we show the
B. bacteriovorus-facilitated, localised breakdown of the prey
wall to form a pore, its re-sealing while also rounding the prey cell wall to form
an osmotically stable bdelloplast.The initial ring of intense FDAA incorporation matches with the gap on the
prey cell wall at the contact point with the B. bacteriovorus pole
(Supplementary Tables 2 and
3, Figures 2a and 3a). Such a re-modelling of the prey PG likely
strengthens the predator entry point. We show also here (Figures 2c and 3b) that
such entry ports have accumulated centralised FDAA signal after B.
bacteriovorus entry which might represent a gradual ring-to-disc
re-sealing activity of this pore; a process which had previously been only inferred
by indirect evidence of “scars” left behind on the prey cell wall at
the point of entry32.The most extensive prey cell wall modification occurs 30-45 min after mixing
B. bacteriovorus with the prey; involving the
L,D-transpeptidases with major contributions from 2 of the 19 LdtBd
enzymes encoded by genes bd0886 and bd1176 (Figure 4a). These observations may be due to
pulsed FDAAs mimicking the incorporation of previously solubilised
m-DAP reported in early B. bacteriovorus
studies23,31 but this is beyond our present experimentation. While we were able to
isolate fluorescent FDAA labelled sacculi, amounts were not sufficient for mass
spectrometry-based identification of sites of D-amino acid incorporation in
Bdellovibrio or E. coli (Supplementary Figure 7).
Incorporation of non-canonical D-amino acids into the cell wall is a stress response
in Vibrio cholerae, which is shown to stabilize the PG integrity of
the cells in stationary phase2. The
incorporation of native m-DAP31 and/or D-amino acids into the prey cell wall by B.
bacteriovorus Ldts early in the predation (15 min – 1 hour)
could represent an analogous means of forming a stabilised and stress resistant
bdelloplast. The susceptibility of bdelloplasts formed by the
Δ2ldt mutant predator to bursting during osmotic stress
(Figure 5b) supports this hypothesis.FDAA labelling also elucidated the growth of the intraperiplasmic B.
bacteriovorus predator directly (Figure
6). Growth starts in patches along the length of the B.
bacteriovorus cell, but not at the poles (Figure 6a and 6b). After B. bacteriovorus septation,
final predator self PG modification produces attack phase B.
bacteriovorus (Figure 6d) which
each emerge with one flagellated and one piliated pole21,33. These experiments
provide evidence that both predator poles can carry out bilateral growth, along the
length of the cell, rather than one “old” pole remaining attached to
the membrane and growth emanating solely from specific regions30,34. Synchronous
septum construction (that results in odd or even progeny numbers) is seen along the
length of the filamentous B. bacteriovorus growing within the
bdelloplast (Figures 6a, 6c-d), confirming
earlier movies of this synchronous division30.In conclusion, the ability to distinctly label the PG containing cell walls
of two different genera of interacting bacteria with different coloured FDAAs, has
illuminated a series of dynamic molecular modifications that predatory B.
bacteriovorus make to prey-cell walls and self-cell walls during their
intraperiplasmic lifestyle. These modifications: pore formation and resealing
without bacterial bursting and PG remodelling with free small molecules, i.e. DAAs,
in dual cell systems are previously uncharacterised in bacteria, and are key
mechanisms of B. bacteriovorus predation. Given the inherent
promiscuity of virtually all PG containing bacteria to incorporate FDAAs in
situ9,35 we expect this general approach to be helpful for
visualising interactions of other complex bacterial communities, e.g. microbiota.
Accordingly, we would not be surprised if this and similar approaches illuminate
other examples of inter-generic PG modifications with novel functions.
Materials and Methods
RNA isolation from predatory cycle and RT-PCR analysis
Synchronous predatory infections of B. bacteriovorus
HD100 on E. coli S17-1 in Ca/HEPES buffer (2 mM
CaCl2 25 mM HEPES pH7.6), or strain S17-1 suspended in Ca/HEPES
alone, were set up as previously described36 with samples throughout the timecourse being taken and total RNA
isolated from them. This semi-quantitative PCR allows the evaluation of specific
predator transcripts in the presence of fluctuating levels of prey RNA as the
predator degrades it. RNA was isolated from the samples using a Promega SV total
RNA isolation kit with the RNA quality being verified by an Agilent Bioanalyser
using the RNA Nano kit. RT-PCR was performed with the Qiagen One-step RT-PCR kit
with the following reaction conditions: One cycle 50°C for 30 minutes,
95°C for 15 minutes, then 25 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C
for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min, a 10 minutes extension at 72°C after
the 30 cycles, and finally a 4°C hold. Two independent repeats were
carried out. Primers to anneal to bd0886 were
5’-AGCCTCTACATGGGTGCAAG -3’ and 5’- AACTTGGCTGCATACCAACC
-3’. Primers to anneal to bd1176 were
5’-GCCAACGCCAGCGTGAATGC-3’ and
5’-GGCCGTCGTTGAGTTGCTGC-3’.
Generating gene deletion mutants in B. bacteriovorus
Markerless deletion of both the bd0886 and
bd1176 genes from B. bacteriovorus HD100
was achieved sequentially as described previously18,37. Primers designed to
amplify to the upstream region of bd0886 were: Bd0886F
5’-ACGGGGTACCCACGATCCCATCTTATAAGC -3’ and Delbd0886F
5’-GGAGATTATATGAAAGCTTTCTAGAATGGACTCTGTTCCTGCGC-3’. Primers
designed to amplify to the downstream region of bd0886 were:
Delbd0886R 5’-GCGCAGGAACAGAGTCCATTCTAGAAAGCTTTCATATAATCTCC-3’ and
Bd0886R 5’-ctgtagcatgc TTCAGATCCTCGCTGAAACC-3’ Primers designed to
amplify to the upstream region of bd1176 were: Bd1176-F
5’- GCGCAAAAGCTTTCGCAAGCTGGGTGTTCAGC -3’ and Delbd1176F 5’-
GATTGCCAGCTCCCCTATGTCTAGAAATCCTCCGAAGATCGTTT -3’. Primers designed to
amplify to the downstream region of bd1176 were: Delbd1176R
5’- AAACGATCTTCGGAGGATTTCTAGACATAGGGGAGCTGGCAATC -3’ and Bd1176-R
5’- ACGGGGTACCGGATGTGATTCATACCAGCC-3’
Construction of an E. coli strain lacking all 6
LD-transpeptidases
E. coli BW25113Δ6LDT lacks all five previously
published LD-transpeptidase genes (erfK, ybiS,
ycfS, ynhG, ycbB)27,38 plus a sixth gene encoding a putative LD-transpeptidase,
yafK. Gene deletions were generated and combined by
transferring kan-marked alleles from the Keio E.
coli single-gene knockout library39 into relevant background strains using P1 phage transduction40. The Keio pKD13-derived
kan cassette is flanked by FRT sites, allowing removal of
the kan marker via expression of FLP recombinase from plasmid
pCP20 to generate unmarked deletions with a FRT-site scar sequence39,41. The gene deletions present in BW25113Δ6LDT were verified
by PCR, and the analysis of the PG composition showed that muropeptides
generated by the activities LD-transpeptidases were below the limit of
detection.
Fluorescent tagging of Bd1176
The bd1176 gene lacking its stop codon was cloned into
the conjugable vector pK18mobsacB in such a way as to fuse the
genes at the C-terminus with the mCherry gene. This fusion was introduced into
B. bacteriovorus by conjugation as described
previously42. Cloning was carried out
using the NEB Gibson cloning assembly kit and the primers used
(5’-3’) were: cgttgtaaaacgacggccagtgccaATGACAAAGATTAATACGCGCC,
ccttgctcaccatGTTGTTGCCGCCTCTTCTTG, aggcggcaacaacATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAG and
cagctatgaccatgattacgTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCC Epi-fluorescence microscopy was
undertaken using a Nikon Eclipse E600 through a 100x objective (NA 1.25) and
acquired using a Hammamatsu Orca ER Camera. Images were captured using Simple
PCI software (version 6.6). An hcRED filter block (excitation: 550-600 nm;
emission: 610-665 nm) was used for visualisation of mCherry tags.
Labelling of cells with FDAAs and imaging
Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus HD100 cells were grown
predatorily for 16 hours at 30°C on stationary phase E.
coli S17-1 prey, until these were lysed. The B.
bacteriovorus were then filtered through a 0.45 µm filter
(yielding ~2 x 108 pfu per ml) and concentrated 30 x by
centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 5 minutes. The resulting
pellet was resuspended in Ca/HEPES buffer, (2 mM CaCl2 25 mM HEPES
ph7.6) and then pre-labelled with a final concentration of 500 µM BADA
(by addition of 5 µl of a 50 mM stock in DMSO) for 30 minutes at
30°C. The cells were then washed twice in Ca/HEPES buffer before being
resuspended in an equal volume of Ca/HEPES buffer. E. coli
S17-1 or E. coli imp4213 cells were grown for 16 hours in LB at
37°C with shaking at 100 rpm and were back diluted to OD600
1.0 in fresh LB, (yielding ~1 x 109 cfu per ml) and labelled
with final concentration of 500 µM TADA (by addition of 5 µl of a
50 mM stock in DMSO) for 30 minutes at 30°C, before being washed twice in
Ca/HEPES buffer then resuspended in an equal volume of Ca/HEPES buffer.
E. coli BW25113 strains were grown as for strain S17-1,
except strains YB7423, YB7424 and YB7439 were supplemented with 50 µg per
ml kanamycin suphate for incubation and washed of this by centrifugation at
5,000 x g for 5 minutes, resuspension in an equal volume of LB
broth and further centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 5 minutes
before back-dilution to OD600 1.0 in Ca/HEPES buffer. This resulted
in similar numbers of cells for each strain; E. coli BW25113
Δ6LDT 5.1 x 108 ± 3.6 x 107, YB7423 5.2 x
108 ± 1.8 x 108, YB7424 4.9 x
108 ± 2 x 107, YB74394.3 x
108 ± 1.6 x 108 as determined by colony forming
units.Defined ratios of approximately 5 B. bacteriovorus
predators to 1 E. coli prey were then prepared for
semi-synchronous predation experiments to allow FDAA labelling of dynamic PG
changes as the predators were invading and replicating within the prey. Five
hundred microlitres of the pre-labelled B. bacteriovorus were
mixed with 400 µl of the pre-labelled E. coli and 300
µl of Ca/HEPES buffer and incubated at 30°C. For HADA
pulse-labelling, 120 µl samples of these predatory cultures were added to
1.2 µl of a 50 mM stock of HADA in DMSO 10 minutes before each sampling
timepoint for microscopy and returned to 30°C incubation. These
experimental timescales are consistent and shown in diagram above figures (for
example 30 minute predation timepoint = 20 minutes of predator mixed with prey,
plus 10 minutes of subsequent HADA labelling, followed by immediate fixation and
then washing). At the timepoint, all the 120 µl predator-prey sample was
transferred to 175 µl ice cold ethanol and incubated at -20°C
>15 minutes to fix the cells. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation
at 12,000 x g for 5 minutes, washed with 500 µl PBS and
resuspended in 5 µl Slowfade (Molecular Probes Ltd) and stored at
-20°C before imaging. 2 µl samples were imaged using a Nikon Ti-E
inverted fluorescence microscope equipped with a Plan Apo 60x/1.40 Oil Ph3 DM
objective with 1.5x intermediate magnification, or a Plan Apo 100x/1.45 Ph3
objective, a CFP/YFP filter cube and an Andor DU885 EMCCD or an Andor Neo sCMOS
camera using CFP settings for detection of HADA (emission maximum 450 nm), a
FITC filter cube for detection of BADA (emission maximum 512 nm) and others
(acquisition and image processing details in Equipment and settings
in supporting online material). Later timepoints were prepared with similar HADA
pulses carried out on further samples of the continuing predator- prey culture
which extended to 4 hours of incubation at 30°C; the point at which new
B. bacteriovorus predators emerge from lysed E.
coli prey.
Super resolution microscopy
3D Structured illumination microscopy was performed using a DeltaVision
OMX Imaging System equipped with an Olympus UPlanSApo 100X/1.40 Oil PSF
objective and a Photometrics Cascade II EMCCD camera. The samples were excited
with lasers at 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm and the emission was detected through 419
nm-465 nm, 500 nm-550 nm, 609 nm-654 nm emission filters. The image processing
was conducted by SoftWorx imaging software. Further image analysis and
processing was conducted via ImageJ or Icy (http://www.bioimageanalysis.org/). Acquisition and image
processing details are in Equipment and settings in supporting
online material.
Quantitation of fluorescent signal
For quantitation of fluorescent signal, images were acquired as above,
but with unvarying exposure and gain settings. The exposures were chosen to give
values that did not exceed the maximum so that saturation was not reached for
any of the fluorescent channels. Images were analysed using the MicrobeJ plugin
for the ImageJ (FIJI distribution) software (http://www.indiana.edu/~microbej/index.html)43 which automates detection of bacteria
within an image. The E. coli prey cells and
Bdellovibrio cells were detected using the resulting binary
mask from both the phase contrast and either the TADA or the BADA channels
respectively. The E. coli prey cells and B.
bacteriovorus cells were differentiated by defining two cell types
based on size; Cell Type 1 (for E. coli) were defined by area
0.9-6 µm2, length 1.5-7 µm, width 0.4-3 µm and
all other parameters as default; Cell Type 2 (for the smaller B.
bacteriovorus cells) were defined by area 0-1
µm2, length 0.5-1.5 µm, width 0.2-0.8 µm and all
other parameters as default. Manual inspection of the analysed images confirmed
that the vast majority of cells were correctly assigned.
Bdellovibrio cells were linked hierarchically with the
E. coli prey cells, in order to distinguish between
internalized, attached and unattached predator cells. The shape measurements
including the angularity, area, aspect ratio, circularity, curvature, length,
roundness, sinuosity, solidity and width were measured for each type of cell.
Background-corrected mean fluorescent intensity was measured for each cell and
then the mean of these measurements was determined for each cell type, for each
independent experiment. Typically, 500-5,000 cells were measured at each
timepoint for each independent experiment (details of n for each sample in each
experiment are presented in Supplementary Table 1).
Code availability
The images and the data were analyzed by MicrobeJ (5.11v), a freely
available and open-source software. The code source is available upon request
from Adrien Ducret.
CPRG assay of leakage of osmotically shocked bdelloplasts derived from
predation by Ldt mutant versus wild type B.
bacteriovorus
To evaluate whether DAA transfer to prey bdelloplast cell walls altered
the physical stability of those walls to osmotic changes, an assay for leakage
of cytoplasmic contents, including β-galactosidase was used, with the
CPRG as a detection reagent.E. coli S17-1 (lac) prey
cells were grown for 16 hours in YT broth at 37°C with 200 rpm shaking,
before being supplemented with 200 µgml-1 IPTG for 2 hours to
induce expression of lacZ. These prey cells were then
centrifuged at 5,100 x g for 5 minutes and resuspended in
Ca/HEPES buffer (2 mM CaCl2 25 mM HEPES ph7.6) then diluted to
OD600 1.0 in Ca/HEPES buffer. Bdellovibrio
bacteriovorus HD100 or Δ2ldt strains were
grown predatorily for 16 hours at 29°C on stationary phase E.
coli S17-1 prey until these were fully lysed, and then B.
bacteriovorus were filtered through a 0.45 µm filter,
concentrated 50 x by centrifugation at 5,100 x g for 20 minutes
and resuspended in Ca/HEPES buffer. Total protein concentration of these
concentrated suspensions was determined by Lowry assay, and matched amounts of
50 µg of each strain were used for semi-synchronous infections (between
115 and 284 µl of concentrated suspension made up to a total of 800
µl in Ca/HEPES buffer) with 400 µl of diluted E.
coli S17-1 prey cells. This resulted in a multiplicity of infection
(MOI of B. bacteriovorus cells : E. coli
cells) of 1.4 to 10.5 for the wild-type strain HD100 as determined by plaque
assay. The excess of predators resulted in >99.4% of
E.coli prey cells rounded by invasion of strain HD100 and
>99.6% of prey cells rounded by invasion of Δ2ldt
mutant after incubation at 29°C for 1 hour with shaking at 200 rpm.A control of prey only (400 µl diluted prey cells with 800
µl Ca/HEPES buffer) resulted in no rounded prey cells and a control of
wild-type B. bacteriovorus HD100 cells only (50 µg in a
total of 1200 µl Ca/HEPES buffer) was included. After incubation,
bdelloplasts (or cells in the controls) were harvested by centrifugation at
17,000 x g for 2 minutes and supernatant removed. The pellets
were resuspended in: 1) Ca/HEPES buffer supplemented with 20
µgml-1 CPRG (Sigma) for centrifugation shock only 2)
Ca/HEPES buffer supplemented with 750mM NaCl and 20 µgml-1
CPRG for upshock 3) Ca/HEPES buffer supplemented with 750mM NaCl, incubated for
30 minutes at 29°C followed by centrifugation at 17,000 x
g for 2 minutes and supernatant removed, then the pellet
resuspended in water supplemented with 20 µgml-1 CPRG for
downshock. These were then incubated for 30 minutes at 29°C before
purifying the supernatant, containing any bdelloplast leakage products, for
β-galactosidase assay by removing cells by centrifugation at 17,000 x
g for 2 minutes followed by filtration through a 0.2
µm filter. The β-galactosidase assay was carried out by incubation
at 29°C for 26 hours and colour change was monitored by spectrophotometry
at 574 nm. Data were normalised for each experiment.Extra experimental considerations: The Δ2ldt
mutant strain exhibited a plaquing phenotype, forming mostly very small plaques
with ~1% forming larger plaques similar to the wild-type HD100 strain
(see Supplementary Figure
6) and as such an accurate MOI could not be measured by plaques for
this strain. To confirm that matching the input cells by Lowry assay resulted in
similar numbers of B. bacteriovorus, and therefore a similar
MOI, images of the mixed prey and predators were analysed. After the 1 hour
incubation at 29°C, 40 µl samples were mixed with 2 µl of
0.3 µm polystyrene beads (Sigma; diluted 500 x and washed 5 x with
water). 10 µl samples were dropped onto microscope slides with a 1%
agarose pad made with Ca/HEPES buffer and 20 fields of view were imaged at 1000
x phase contrast with a Nikon Ti-E inverted microscope. Images were analysed
with the MicrobeJ plugin as described above, but including a third cell type
definition for quantifying the beads defined by area 0-1, length 0.1-0.8, width
0.1-0.6 and all other parameters 0-max. This confirmed that there were not
significantly different ratios of beads to B. bacteriovorus
cells in the two strains (6.1 ± 3.9 for HD100, 6.9 ± 0.7 for
Δ2ldt mutant) and that all visible prey cells were
rounded up after 1 hour of incubation, indicating that an MOI of >1 was
achieved (which was required for semi-synchronous infection). To confirm that
the defective plaquing phenotype of the Δ2ldt mutant was
not a result of low yield in liquid culture, images were analysed at the start
and end of predatory growth in liquid. The average result of 5 Lowry assays was
taken to match the starting amounts of B. bacteriovorus: 245
µl of strain HD100 and 337 µl of the Δ2ldt
mutant strain (after filtration through a 0.45 µm filter, but not
concentrated) were made up to 800 µl in Ca/HEPES buffer and added to 400
µl prey E. coli diluted to OD600 1.0 in
Ca/HEPES buffer. This mix was imaged with beads as described above at time 0 and
24 hours (after incubation at 29°C with 200 rpm shaking) and analysed
using the MicrobeJ plugin as described above. The increase in numbers of
B. bacteriovorus cells per bead was not significantly
different between the 2 strains (1.9 ± 0.5 for HD100 and 2.1 ± 0.8
for the Δ2ldt mutant). In both cases, the prey cells
were almost eradicated after 24 hours with only 8-13 cells detected by MicrobeJ
in the 20 fields of view for each experiment (reduced to 1.0 ± 0.4 % of
starting values for HD100 and 3.3 ± 0.8 % for the
Δ2ldt mutant).
Authors: Susan F Koval; Sandra H Hynes; Ronald S Flannagan; Zohar Pasternak; Yaacov Davidov; Edouard Jurkevitch Journal: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: Carey Lambert; Ian T Cadby; Rob Till; Nhat Khai Bui; Thomas R Lerner; William S Hughes; David J Lee; Luke J Alderwick; Waldemar Vollmer; R Elizabeth Sockett; Elizabeth R Sockett; Andrew L Lovering Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Hubert Lam; Dong-Chan Oh; Felipe Cava; Constantin N Takacs; Jon Clardy; Miguel A de Pedro; Matthew K Waldor Journal: Science Date: 2009-09-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Carey Lambert; Thomas R Lerner; Nhat Khai Bui; Hannah Somers; Shin-Ichi Aizawa; Susan Liddell; Ana Clark; Waldemar Vollmer; Andrew L Lovering; R Elizabeth Sockett Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Nowrosh Islam; Misha I Kazi; Katie N Kang; Jacob Biboy; Joe Gray; Feroz Ahmed; Richard D Schargel; Cara C Boutte; Tobias Dörr; Waldemar Vollmer; Joseph M Boll Journal: mBio Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 7.786
Authors: Benjamin R Wucher; Mennat Elsayed; James S Adelman; Daniel E Kadouri; Carey D Nadell Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 10.900