Literature DB >> 28974059

Predictor of fluid responsiveness in the 'grey zone': augmented pulse pressure variation through a temporary increase in tidal volume.

J J Min1, N-S Gil1, J-H Lee1, D K Ryu1, C S Kim1, S M Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulse pressure variation (PPV) is widely used as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. However, a previous study has suggested a 'grey zone' between 9 and 13% in which PPV would be inconclusive to predict fluid responsiveness. Considering PPV is based on cardiopulmonary interactions, we evaluated whether an augmented PPV using a temporary increase in tidal volume (V T ) from 8 to 12 ml kg -1 has the predictability for fluid responsiveness in patients within the grey zone.
METHODS: Adult patients requiring general anaesthesia were enrolled. During the period when PPV was within the range of 9-13%, haemodynamic variables such as stroke volume index (SVI) and PPV with an 8 ml kg -1 tidal volume ventilation (PPV8) were obtained before and after volume expansion (6 ml kg -1 ) under mechanical ventilation. Augmented PPV induced by 2-min ventilation with a V T of 12 ml kg -1 (PPV12) was also recorded immediately before volume loading. The patients whose SVI increased ≥10% after volume expansion were considered responders.
RESULTS: In 38 enrolled patients, 20 were responders. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed PPV12 had an excellent predictability for fluid responsiveness {area under the curve [AUC]=0.935 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.805-0.989]; sensitivity 95%; specificity 72%; P <0.0001}. The optimal threshold for PPV12 was >17%. However, PPV8 failed to show significant predictability [AUC=0.668 (95% CI 0.497-0.812); sensitivity 65%; specificity 61%; P =0.06].
CONCLUSION: In mechanically ventilated patients, our augmented PPV successfully predicted fluid responsiveness in the previously suggested grey zone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02653469.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac output; cardiovascular system; effects; fluid therapy; heart; intraoperative; monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28974059     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  10 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients.

Authors:  Mathieu Jozwiak; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

2.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients: the performance of seven different functional hemodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Michael T Ganter; Martin Geisen; Sonja Hartnack; Omer Dzemali; Christoph K Hofer
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 3.  Evaluation of fluid responsiveness during COVID-19 pandemic: what are the remaining choices?

Authors:  Ahmed Hasanin; Maha Mostafa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Evaluation of volume responsiveness by pulse pressure variability and inferior vena cava dispensability index at different tidal volumes by mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Fujuan He; Xiaoqiang Li; Suman Thapa; Chi Li; Jiawei Luo; Wenyan Dai; Jin Liu
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.590

Review 5.  Fluid responsiveness in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Lee; Eun-Hee Kim; Young-Eun Jang; Hee-Soo Kim; Jin-Tae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-10-01

Review 6.  PPV May Be a Starting Point to Achieve Circulatory Protective Mechanical Ventilation.

Authors:  Longxiang Su; Pan Pan; Huaiwu He; Dawei Liu; Yun Long
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-02

7.  Efficacy of using tidal volume challenge to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation reduced in low tidal volume ventilated critically ill patients with decreased respiratory system compliance.

Authors:  Yujun Xu; Jun Guo; Qin Wu; Junjun Chen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by the Effect of the Lung Recruitment Maneuver on the Perfusion Index in Mechanically Ventilated Patients During Surgery.

Authors:  Sunthiti Morakul; Naruemol Prachanpanich; Pattarada Permsakmesub; Pimwatana Pinsem; Wasineenart Mongkolpun; Konlawij Trongtrakul
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-17

9.  Comparison of Changes in PPV Using a Tidal Volume Challenge with a Passive Leg Raising Test to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Ventilated Using Low Tidal Volume.

Authors:  Ahmed I Elsayed; Khaled Aw Selim; Hanan E Zaghla; Hossam E Mowafy; Mohammed A Fakher
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-06

10.  Some light in the grey zone?

Authors:  J Bickenbach; G Marx
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 9.166

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.