Kristen L Janky1, Jessie N Patterson2, Neil T Shepard3, Megan L A Thomas1, Julie A Honaker2,4. 1. Boys Town National Research Hospital, Department of Audiology, Omaha, NE. 2. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, Lincoln, NE. 3. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 4. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous video head impulse test (vHIT) devices are available commercially; however, gain is not calculated uniformly. An evaluation of these devices/algorithms in healthy controls and patients with vestibular loss is necessary for comparing and synthesizing work that utilizes different devices and gain calculations. PURPOSE: Using three commercially available vHIT devices/algorithms, the purpose of the present study was to compare: (1) horizontal canal vHIT gain among devices/algorithms in normal control subjects; (2) the effects of age on vHIT gain for each device/algorithm in normal control subjects; and (3) the clinical performance of horizontal canal vHIT gain between devices/algorithms for differentiating normal versus abnormal vestibular function. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-one normal control adult subjects (range 20-78) and eleven adults with unilateral or bilateral vestibular loss (range 32-79). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: vHIT was administered using three different devices/algorithms, randomized in order, for each subject on the same day: (1) Impulse (Otometrics, Schaumberg, IL; monocular eye recording, right eye only; using area under the curve gain), (2) EyeSeeCam (Interacoustics, Denmark; monocular eye recording, left eye only; using instantaneous gain), and (3) VisualEyes (MicroMedical, Chatham, IL, binocular eye recording; using position gain). RESULTS: There was a significant mean difference in vHIT gain among devices/algorithms for both the normal control and vestibular loss groups. vHIT gain was significantly larger in the ipsilateral direction of the eye used to measure gain; however, in spite of the significant mean differences in vHIT gain among devices/algorithms and the significant directional bias, classification of "normal" versus "abnormal" gain is consistent across all compared devices/algorithms, with the exception of instantaneous gain at 40 msec. There was not an effect of age on vHIT gain up to 78 years regardless of the device/algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support that vHIT gain is significantly different between devices/algorithms, suggesting that care should be taken when making direct comparisons of absolute gain values between devices/algorithms. American Academy of Audiology
BACKGROUND: Numerous video head impulse test (vHIT) devices are available commercially; however, gain is not calculated uniformly. An evaluation of these devices/algorithms in healthy controls and patients with vestibular loss is necessary for comparing and synthesizing work that utilizes different devices and gain calculations. PURPOSE: Using three commercially available vHIT devices/algorithms, the purpose of the present study was to compare: (1) horizontal canal vHIT gain among devices/algorithms in normal control subjects; (2) the effects of age on vHIT gain for each device/algorithm in normal control subjects; and (3) the clinical performance of horizontal canal vHIT gain between devices/algorithms for differentiating normal versus abnormal vestibular function. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-one normal control adult subjects (range 20-78) and eleven adults with unilateral or bilateral vestibular loss (range 32-79). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: vHIT was administered using three different devices/algorithms, randomized in order, for each subject on the same day: (1) Impulse (Otometrics, Schaumberg, IL; monocular eye recording, right eye only; using area under the curve gain), (2) EyeSeeCam (Interacoustics, Denmark; monocular eye recording, left eye only; using instantaneous gain), and (3) VisualEyes (MicroMedical, Chatham, IL, binocular eye recording; using position gain). RESULTS: There was a significant mean difference in vHIT gain among devices/algorithms for both the normal control and vestibular loss groups. vHIT gain was significantly larger in the ipsilateral direction of the eye used to measure gain; however, in spite of the significant mean differences in vHIT gain among devices/algorithms and the significant directional bias, classification of "normal" versus "abnormal" gain is consistent across all compared devices/algorithms, with the exception of instantaneous gain at 40 msec. There was not an effect of age on vHIT gain up to 78 years regardless of the device/algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support that vHIT gain is significantly different between devices/algorithms, suggesting that care should be taken when making direct comparisons of absolute gain values between devices/algorithms. American Academy of Audiology
Authors: José A Lopez-Escamez; John Carey; Won-Ho Chung; Joel A Goebel; Måns Magnusson; Marco Mandalà; David E Newman-Toker; Michael Strupp; Mamoru Suzuki; Franco Trabalzini; Alexandre Bisdorff Journal: Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp Date: 2015-08-12
Authors: Steven Lewis Bell; Fiona Barker; Henry Heselton; Emma MacKenzie; Debra Dewhurst; Alan Sanderson Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2014-11-23 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Yuri Agrawal; Maria Geraldine Zuniga; Marcela Davalos-Bichara; Michael C Schubert; Jeremy D Walston; Jennifer Hughes; John P Carey Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Leigh A McGarvie; Hamish G MacDougall; G Michael Halmagyi; Ann M Burgess; Konrad P Weber; Ian S Curthoys Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: T S van Dooren; D Starkov; F M P Lucieer; B Vermorken; A M L Janssen; N Guinand; A Pérez-Fornos; V Van Rompaey; H Kingma; R van de Berg Journal: J Neurol Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Grace A Gabriel; Laurence R Harris; Joshua J Gnanasegaram; Sharon L Cushing; Karen A Gordon; Bruce C Haycock; Jennifer L Campos Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: T Maxwell Parker; Nathan Farrell; Jorge Otero-Millan; Amir Kheradmand; Ayodele McClenney; David E Newman-Toker Journal: Digit Biomark Date: 2020-12-30