T Maxwell Parker1, Nathan Farrell1, Jorge Otero-Millan1,2, Amir Kheradmand1, Ayodele McClenney3, David E Newman-Toker1,3. 1. Division of Neuro-Visual and Vestibular Disorders, Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2. Optometry and Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA. 3. Armstrong Institute Center for Diagnostic Excellence, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Differentiating benign from dangerous causes of dizziness or vertigo presents a major diagnostic challenge for many clinicians. Bedside presentations of peripheral vestibular disorders and posterior fossa strokes are often indistinguishable other than by a few subtle vestibular eye movements. The most challenging of these to interpret is the head impulse test (HIT) of vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) function. There have been major advances in portable video-oculography (VOG) quantification of the video HIT (vHIT), but these specialized devices are not routinely available in most clinical settings. As a first step towards smartphone-based diagnosis of strokes in patients presenting vestibular symptoms, we sought proof of concept that we could use a smartphone application ("app") to accurately record the vHIT. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional agreement study comparing a novel index test (smartphone-based vHIT app) to an accepted reference standard test (VOG-based vHIT) for measuring VOR function. We recorded passive (examiner-performed) vHIT sequentially with both methods in a convenience sample of patients visiting an otoneurology clinic. We quantitatively correlated VOR gains (ratio of eye to head movements during the HIT) from each side/ear and experts qualitatively assessed the physiologic traces by the two methods. RESULTS: We recruited 11 patients; 1 patient's vHIT could not be reliably quantified with either device. The novel and reference test VOR gain measurements for each ear (n = 20) were highly correlated (Pearson's r = 0.9, p = 0.0000001) and, qualitatively, clinically equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study provides proof of concept that an "eyePhone" app could be used to measure vHIT and eventually developed to diagnose vestibular strokes by smartphone.
OBJECTIVE: Differentiating benign from dangerous causes of dizziness or vertigo presents a major diagnostic challenge for many clinicians. Bedside presentations of peripheral vestibular disorders and posterior fossa strokes are often indistinguishable other than by a few subtle vestibular eye movements. The most challenging of these to interpret is the head impulse test (HIT) of vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) function. There have been major advances in portable video-oculography (VOG) quantification of the video HIT (vHIT), but these specialized devices are not routinely available in most clinical settings. As a first step towards smartphone-based diagnosis of strokes in patients presenting vestibular symptoms, we sought proof of concept that we could use a smartphone application ("app") to accurately record the vHIT. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional agreement study comparing a novel index test (smartphone-based vHIT app) to an accepted reference standard test (VOG-based vHIT) for measuring VOR function. We recorded passive (examiner-performed) vHIT sequentially with both methods in a convenience sample of patients visiting an otoneurology clinic. We quantitatively correlated VOR gains (ratio of eye to head movements during the HIT) from each side/ear and experts qualitatively assessed the physiologic traces by the two methods. RESULTS: We recruited 11 patients; 1 patient's vHIT could not be reliably quantified with either device. The novel and reference test VOR gain measurements for each ear (n = 20) were highly correlated (Pearson's r = 0.9, p = 0.0000001) and, qualitatively, clinically equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study provides proof of concept that an "eyePhone" app could be used to measure vHIT and eventually developed to diagnose vestibular strokes by smartphone.
Authors: David E Newman-Toker; Adam C Schaffer; C Winnie Yu-Moe; Najlla Nassery; Ali S Saber Tehrani; Gwendolyn D Clemens; Zheyu Wang; Yuxin Zhu; Mehdi Fanai; Dana Siegal Journal: Diagnosis (Berl) Date: 2019-08-27
Authors: Peter Müller-Barna; Nikolai Dominik Hubert; Christina Bergner; Nina Schütt-Becker; Holger Rambold; Roman Ludwig Haberl; Gordian Jan Hubert Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Georgios Mantokoudis; Ali S Saber Tehrani; Amy Wozniak; Karin Eibenberger; Jorge C Kattah; Cynthia I Guede; David S Zee; David E Newman-Toker Journal: J Vestib Res Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: Georgios Mantokoudis; Ali S Saber Tehrani; Jorge C Kattah; Karin Eibenberger; Cynthia I Guede; David S Zee; David E Newman-Toker Journal: Audiol Neurootol Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 1.854
Authors: David E Newman-Toker; Ali S Saber Tehrani; Georgios Mantokoudis; John H Pula; Cynthia I Guede; Kevin A Kerber; Ari Blitz; Sarah H Ying; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Richard E Rothman; Daniel F Hanley; David S Zee; Jorge C Kattah Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Mamata V Kene; Dustin W Ballard; David R Vinson; Adina S Rauchwerger; Hilary R Iskin; Anthony S Kim Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2015-10-20
Authors: Rascha von Martial; Christina Leinweber; Nikolai Hubert; Holger Rambold; Roman Ludwig Haberl; Gordian Jan Hubert; Peter Müller-Barna Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: T Maxwell Parker; Shervin Badihian; Ahmed Hassoon; Ali S Saber Tehrani; Nathan Farrell; David E Newman-Toker; Jorge Otero-Millan Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Peter Müller-Barna; Christina Leinweber; Julia Pfaffenrath; Nina Schütt-Becker; Rascha von Martial; Susanne Greck; Nikolai Hubert; Holger Rambold; Roman Haberl; Gordian Jan Hubert Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Narayani Wagle; John Morkos; Jingyan Liu; Henry Reith; Joseph Greenstein; Kirby Gong; Indranuj Gangan; Daniil Pakhomov; Sanchit Hira; Oleg V Komogortsev; David E Newman-Toker; Raimond Winslow; David S Zee; Jorge Otero-Millan; Kemar E Green Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-08-11 Impact factor: 4.086