OBJECTIVES: To assess the modification of the form of medication and evaluate staff observance of good clinical practices. DESIGN: One-day assessment of clinical practices. SETTING: 17 geriatrics units in the 3 Teaching Hospitals of Paris-Sud (APHP), France. PARTICIPANTS: Elderly in-patients with difficulties swallowing capsules and tablets. MEASUREMENTS: Assessment of target-patient prescriptions and direct observation of nurses' medical rounds. RESULTS: 155/526 in-patients (29.5%) were unable to swallow tablets or capsules: 98 (40.3%) in long-term care, 46 patients (23.8%) in the rehabilitation unit and 11 (12.2%) in the acute care unit (p = .005). In thirty-nine (27.3%) of the 143 prescriptions studied all tablets were safe to crush and all capsules were safe to open. In 104 cases, at least one medication could not be safely modified, including 26 cases (18.2%) in which none of the prescribed drugs were safe to crush or open. In 48.2% of the 110 medications that were crushed, crushing was forbidden, and presented a potential threat in 12.7% of cases or a reduced efficacy in 8.2% of cases. Crushing methods were rarely appropriate: no specific protective equipment was used (81.8%), crushing equipment was shared between patients without cleaning (95.1%), medications were spilled or lost (69.9%). The method of administration was appropriate (water, jellified water) in 25% of the cases, questionable (soup, coffee, compote, juice, cream) in 55% of the cases and unacceptable (laxative) in 21% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Management of drug prescriptions in patients with swallowing difficulties is not optimal, and may even have iatrogenic effects. In this study, 12.7% of the modifications of the drug form could have been harmful. Doctors, pharmacists and nurses need to reevaluate their practices.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the modification of the form of medication and evaluate staff observance of good clinical practices. DESIGN: One-day assessment of clinical practices. SETTING: 17 geriatrics units in the 3 Teaching Hospitals of Paris-Sud (APHP), France. PARTICIPANTS: Elderly in-patients with difficulties swallowing capsules and tablets. MEASUREMENTS: Assessment of target-patient prescriptions and direct observation of nurses' medical rounds. RESULTS: 155/526 in-patients (29.5%) were unable to swallow tablets or capsules: 98 (40.3%) in long-term care, 46 patients (23.8%) in the rehabilitation unit and 11 (12.2%) in the acute care unit (p = .005). In thirty-nine (27.3%) of the 143 prescriptions studied all tablets were safe to crush and all capsules were safe to open. In 104 cases, at least one medication could not be safely modified, including 26 cases (18.2%) in which none of the prescribed drugs were safe to crush or open. In 48.2% of the 110 medications that were crushed, crushing was forbidden, and presented a potential threat in 12.7% of cases or a reduced efficacy in 8.2% of cases. Crushing methods were rarely appropriate: no specific protective equipment was used (81.8%), crushing equipment was shared between patients without cleaning (95.1%), medications were spilled or lost (69.9%). The method of administration was appropriate (water, jellified water) in 25% of the cases, questionable (soup, coffee, compote, juice, cream) in 55% of the cases and unacceptable (laxative) in 21% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Management of drug prescriptions in patients with swallowing difficulties is not optimal, and may even have iatrogenic effects. In this study, 12.7% of the modifications of the drug form could have been harmful. Doctors, pharmacists and nurses need to reevaluate their practices.
Authors: Julia T Schiele; Renate Quinzler; Hans-Dieter Klimm; Markus G Pruszydlo; Walter E Haefeli Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-09-29 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: M Caussin; W Mourier; S Philippe; C Capet; M Adam; N Reynero; C Jouini; A-S Colombier; K Kadri; I Landrin; E Gréboval; E Rémy; F Marc; M Touflet; F Wirotius; N Delabre; C Le Hiress; V Rorteau; M Vimard; M Dufour; C Tharasse; B Dieu; R Varin; J Doucet Journal: Rev Med Interne Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 0.728
Authors: Denis O'Mahony; David O'Sullivan; Stephen Byrne; Marie Noelle O'Connor; Cristin Ryan; Paul Gallagher Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Herman J Woerdenbag; J Carolina Visser; Marlyn P A M Leferink Op Reinink; Roël R van Orsoy; Anko C Eissens; Paul Hagedoorn; Hilda Dijkstra; Derk P Allersma; Shi W Ng; Oscar S N M Smeets; Henderik W Frijlink Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 6.321