Literature DB >> 22705029

[Crushing drugs in geriatric units: an "handicraft" practice with frequent errors which imposed recommendations].

M Caussin1, W Mourier, S Philippe, C Capet, M Adam, N Reynero, C Jouini, A-S Colombier, K Kadri, I Landrin, E Gréboval, E Rémy, F Marc, M Touflet, F Wirotius, N Delabre, C Le Hiress, V Rorteau, M Vimard, M Dufour, C Tharasse, B Dieu, R Varin, J Doucet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Swallowing disorders or psycho-behavioural distress frequently interfere on drug administration in elderly inpatients. Crushing drugs is a common although non validated practice. The objective of this first prospective study, performed in all geriatric units of the Rouen university hospital by a multidisciplinary group, was to assess the crushing practice, from the prescription to the administration of the drugs in order to elaborate corrective measures.
METHODS: A survey was performed in June 2009 and included 683 inpatients, 65 years and above, in 23 geriatric units. If a patient received drugs after crushing, we recorded the reason for crushing, what drugs were crushed, the galenic presentations and the technique used for preparation and administration.
RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-one patients (32.3%) (85.5 ± 6.5 years, females 74.2%) received 1528 drugs (6.9 ± 4 per patient) including 966 drugs (63.2%) after crushing (crushed pills or crushed content of opened capsules), mainly in the morning (50.4%). The main reasons for crushing drugs were swallowing disorders and psycho-behavioural distress. Forty-two percent of crushed drugs had a galenic presentation which did not allow crushing. The patient's drugs were crushed together three out of four times and mixed with different vehicules for administration. The material used for crushing (a mortar, 92.6%) was often the same for several patients (59.4%); 83.5% of crushed drugs were immediately administered to the patients, though there were important variations about schedules of administration.
CONCLUSION: Crushing drugs expose both to iatrogenic hazards and professional risks. Regional and national recommendations were developed in order to correct the errors linked to this practice.
Copyright © 2012 Société nationale française de médecine interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22705029     DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2012.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Med Interne        ISSN: 0248-8663            Impact factor:   0.728


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of Clinical Practices for Crushing Medication in Geriatric Units.

Authors:  M Fodil; D Nghiem; M Colas; S Bourry; A-S Poisson-Salomon; H Rezigue; C Trivalle
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Medication in nursing homes in Alsace: a preferential list of drugs obtained by consensus.

Authors:  Sophia Hannou; Amélie Rousseau; Marie-Christine Rybarczyk-Vigouret; Bruno Michel
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-08-07

3.  Oral medicine modification for older adults: a qualitative study of nurses.

Authors:  Aoife Mc Gillicuddy; Abina M Crean; Maria Kelly; Laura Sahm
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  A Decision Support Tool Facilitating Medicine Design for Optimal Acceptability in The Older Population.

Authors:  Thibault Vallet; Emilie Belissa; Sandra Laribe-Caget; Alain Chevallier; François-Xavier Chedhomme; Patrick Leglise; Matthieu Piccoli; Hugues Michelon; Vanessa Bloch; Sylvie Meaume; Anne-Sophie Grancher; Nathalie Bachalat; Imad Boulaich; Fattima Abdallah; Maite Rabus; Jean-Paul Rwabihama; Annie-Claude Ribemont; Celia Lachuer; Ines Perquy; Laurent Lechowski; Anne Delahaye; Mathieu Depoisson; Yann Orven; Caroline Guinot; Stephane Gibaud; Corinne Michel; Abdel Mahiou; Sid-Ahmed Belbachir; Jean-Hugues Trouvin; Amelie Dufaÿ-Wojcicki; Vincent Boudy; Fabrice Ruiz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.200

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.