Runisha Moodaley1, David M Smith2, Iain R Tough1, Marcus Schindler3, Helen M Cox1. 1. Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, UK. 2. Discovery Sciences, Innovative Medicines & Early Development Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK. 3. AstraZeneca Mölndal, Innovative Medicines & Early Development, Cardiovascular & Metabolic Diseases iMed, Mölndal, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Free fatty acid receptors FFA1 and FFA4 are located on enteroendocrine L cells with the highest gastrointestinal (GI) expression in descending colon. Their activation causes the release of glucagon-like peptide 1 and peptide YY (PYY) from L cells. Additionally, FFA1 agonism releases insulin from pancreatic β cells. As these receptors are modulators of nutrient-stimulated glucose regulation, the aim of this study was to compare the pharmacology of commercially available agonists (TUG424, TUG891, GW9508) with proven selective agonists (JTT, TAK-875, AZ423, Metabolex-36) in mice. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Mouse mucosa was mounted in Ussing chambers, voltage-clamped and the resultant short-circuit current (Isc ) was recorded continuously. Pretreatments included antagonists of FFA1, Y1 or Y2 receptors. Glucose sensitivity was investigated by mannitol replacement apically, and colonic and upper GI transit was assessed in vitro and in vivo. KEY RESULTS: FFA1 and FFA4 agonism required glucose and reduced Isc in a PYY-Y1 receptor-dependent manner. The novel compounds were more potent than GW9508. The FFA1 antagonists (GW1100 and ANT825) blocked FFA1 activity only and revealed FFA1 tonic activity. The FFA4 agonist, Metabolex-36, slowed colonic transit in vitro but increased small intestinal transit in vivo. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The selective FFA1 and FFA4 agonists were more potent at reducing Isc than GW9508, a dual FFA1 and FFA4 agonist. A paracrine epithelial mechanism involving PYY-stimulated Y1 receptors mediated their responses, which were glucose sensitive, potentially limiting hypoglycaemia. ANT825 revealed tonic activity and the possibility of endogenous FFA1 ligands causing PYY release. Finally, FFA4 agonism induced regional differences in transit.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Free fatty acid receptors FFA1 and FFA4 are located on enteroendocrine L cells with the highest gastrointestinal (GI) expression in descending colon. Their activation causes the release of glucagon-like peptide 1 and peptide YY (PYY) from L cells. Additionally, FFA1 agonism releases insulin from pancreatic β cells. As these receptors are modulators of nutrient-stimulated glucose regulation, the aim of this study was to compare the pharmacology of commercially available agonists (TUG424, TUG891, GW9508) with proven selective agonists (JTT, TAK-875, AZ423, Metabolex-36) in mice. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Mouse mucosa was mounted in Ussing chambers, voltage-clamped and the resultant short-circuit current (Isc ) was recorded continuously. Pretreatments included antagonists of FFA1, Y1 or Y2 receptors. Glucose sensitivity was investigated by mannitol replacement apically, and colonic and upper GI transit was assessed in vitro and in vivo. KEY RESULTS: FFA1 and FFA4 agonism required glucose and reduced Isc in a PYY-Y1 receptor-dependent manner. The novel compounds were more potent than GW9508. The FFA1 antagonists (GW1100 and ANT825) blocked FFA1 activity only and revealed FFA1 tonic activity. The FFA4 agonist, Metabolex-36, slowed colonic transit in vitro but increased small intestinal transit in vivo. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The selective FFA1 and FFA4 agonists were more potent at reducing Isc than GW9508, a dual FFA1 and FFA4 agonist. A paracrine epithelial mechanism involving PYY-stimulated Y1 receptors mediated their responses, which were glucose sensitive, potentially limiting hypoglycaemia. ANT825 revealed tonic activity and the possibility of endogenous FFA1 ligands causing PYY release. Finally, FFA4 agonism induced regional differences in transit.
Authors: Hyun-Jung Cho; Eliza S Robinson; Leni R Rivera; Paul J McMillan; Adam Testro; Mehrdad Nikfarjam; David M Bravo; John B Furness Journal: Cell Tissue Res Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: R C Spiller; I F Trotman; B E Higgins; M A Ghatei; G K Grimble; Y C Lee; S R Bloom; J J Misiewicz; D B Silk Journal: Gut Date: 1984-04 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Kristoffer L Egerod; Maja S Engelstoft; Kaare V Grunddal; Mark K Nøhr; Anna Secher; Ichiro Sakata; Jens Pedersen; Johanne A Windeløv; Ernst-Martin Füchtbauer; Jørgen Olsen; Frank Sundler; Jan P Christensen; Nils Wierup; Jesper V Olsen; Jens J Holst; Jeffrey M Zigman; Steen S Poulsen; Thue W Schwartz Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Hilary A Overton; Adam J Babbs; Sheila M Doel; Matthew C T Fyfe; Lisa S Gardner; Graeme Griffin; Helen C Jackson; Martin J Procter; Chrystelle M Rasamison; Mads Tang-Christensen; Peter S Widdowson; Geoffery M Williams; Christine Reynet Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Iain R Tough; Sarah Forbes; Herbert Herzog; Robert M Jones; Thue W Schwartz; Helen M Cox Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Heather A McCauley; Andrea L Matthis; Jacob R Enriquez; Jonah T Nichol; J Guillermo Sanchez; William J Stone; Nambirajan Sundaram; Michael A Helmrath; Marshall H Montrose; Eitaro Aihara; James M Wells Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 14.919