Literature DB >> 28971318

Preferences for multigene panel testing for hereditary breast cancer risk among ethnically diverse BRCA-uninformative families.

Belinda Vicuña1,2,3, Harold D Delaney2, Kristina G Flores1, Lori Ballinger1, Melanie Royce1, Zoneddy Dayao1, Tuya Pal4, Anita Y Kinney5,6,7.   

Abstract

Until recently, genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer has primarily focused on pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) genes. However, advances in DNA sequencing technologies have made simultaneous testing for multiple genes possible. We examined correlates of interest in multigene panel testing and risk communication preferences in an ethnically diverse sample of women who tested negative for BRCA mutations previously but remain at high risk based on their family history (referred to as "BRCA-uninformative") and their at-risk female family members. Two-hundred and thirteen women with a previous breast cancer diagnosis and a BRCA-uninformative test result and their first-degree relatives completed a survey on interest in multigene panel testing, communication preferences, and sociodemographic, psychological, and clinical factors. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with testing interest. Chi-square analyses were used to test differences in risk communication preferences. Interest in multigene panel testing was high (84%) and did not considerably differ by cancer status or ethnicity. In multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with interest in genetic testing were having had a mammogram in the past 2 years (odds ratio (OR) = 4.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80-9.02) and high cancer worry (OR = 3.77, 95% CI 1.34-10.60). Overall, the most commonly preferred genetic communication modes were genetic counselors, oncologists, and print materials. However, non-Hispanic women were more likely than Hispanic women to prefer web-based risk communication (p < 0.001). Hispanic and non-Hispanic women from BRCA-uninformative families have a high level of interest in gene panel testing. Cancer-related emotions and communication preferences should be considered in developing targeted genetic risk communication strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA-uninformative; Family; Hispanic; Interest; Multigene panel testing; Risk communication

Year:  2017        PMID: 28971318      PMCID: PMC5752653          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0322-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  58 in total

Review 1.  eSalud: designing and implementing culturally competent ehealth research with latino patient populations.

Authors:  David Victorson; Jennifer Banas; Jeremiah Smith; Lauren Languido; Elaine Shen; Sandra Gutierrez; Evelyn Cordero; Lucia Flores
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  BRCA genetic counseling among at-risk Latinas in New York City: new beliefs shape new generation.

Authors:  Katarina M Sussner; Tiffany Edwards; Cristina Villagra; M Carina Rodriguez; Hayley S Thompson; Lina Jandorf; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.

Authors:  Kristina G Flores; Laurie E Steffen; Christopher J McLouth; Belinda E Vicuña; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Lucretia Vigil; Zoneddy R Dayao; Melanie E Royce; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Prevalence and type of BRCA mutations in Hispanics undergoing genetic cancer risk assessment in the southwestern United States: a report from the Clinical Cancer Genetics Community Research Network.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weitzel; Jessica Clague; Arelis Martir-Negron; Raquel Ogaz; Josef Herzog; Charité Ricker; Chelsy Jungbluth; Cheryl Cina; Paul Duncan; Gary Unzeitig; J Salvador Saldivar; Mary Beattie; Nancy Feldman; Sharon Sand; Danielle Port; Deborah I Barragan; Esther M John; Susan L Neuhausen; Garrett P Larson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The common sense model of self-regulation and psychological adjustment to predictive genetic testing: a prospective study.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Annette H J T Bröcker-Vriends; Christi J van Asperen; Rolf H Sijmons; Caroline Seynaeve; Arthur R Van Gool; Jan G M Klijn; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing: who and why.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Janet Weiner; Barbara Weber; David A Asch
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Hispanics' use of Internet health information: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Ninfa Peña-Purcell
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2008-04

9.  Psychosocial and Clinical Factors Associated with Family Communication of Cancer Genetic Test Results among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer at a Young Age.

Authors:  Ashley Elrick; Sato Ashida; Jennifer Ivanovich; Sarah Lyons; Barbara B Biesecker; Melody S Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors.

Authors:  Fiona G Stacey; Erica L James; Kathy Chapman; Kerry S Courneya; David R Lubans
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 4.442

View more
  2 in total

1.  Acceptability and outcomes of multigene panel testing among young Black breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Jennifer D Garcia; Cristi Radford; Richard R Reich; Alvaro N Monteiro; Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Outcomes of retesting in patients with previously uninformative cancer genetics evaluations.

Authors:  Shenin A Dettwyler; Erika S Koeppe; Michelle F Jacobs; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.446

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.