| Literature DB >> 28970993 |
Antti Joukainen1,2, Tuomas Virén3,4, Pekko Penttilä5, Jukka Liukkonen4, Pia Henriikka Puhakka6,4, Heikki Kröger1,2, Juha Töyräs6,4.
Abstract
An ultrasound arthroscopy (UA) technique is a promising tool for the evaluation of the articular cartilage during arthroscopic examination. However, the applicability of UA for the evaluation of the hip joint is unknown. We describe a UA assessment of a patient with osteochondritis dissecans at the femoral head. An ultrasound catheter designed for intravascular imaging was inserted into the hip joint by use of conventional arthroscopic portals, and the cartilage surfaces of the femoral head and acetabulum were investigated with ultrasound. UA provided essential quantitative information on the integrity of the articular cartilage and the condition of the subchondral plate not assessable with conventional arthroscopy. Furthermore, the UA technique provided the possibility to monitor arthroscopy-assisted retrograde drilling and bone transplantation in the hip joint.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28970993 PMCID: PMC5621660 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.03.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthrosc Tech ISSN: 2212-6287
Fig 1(A) Plain radiographic image of right proximal femur (posterior-anterior direction). (B) Magnetic resonance image of right proximal femur (proton density, coronal plane) with site of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion magnified. (C) Anterior and anterolateral arthroscopic portals used to conduct ultrasound arthroscopy. (D) Representative ultrasound image of OCD lesion in coronal plane (ultrasound [US] catheter in anterior portal). (E) Arthroscopic view of OCD lesion (arthroscope in anterolateral portal). Ultrasound (US) imaging provided highly detailed information on the OCD lesion. The real-time evaluation of the extent of the lesion, as well as the assessment of the cartilage inner structures and subchondral bone, was possible.
Fig 2Arthroscopic and ultrasound images of intact cartilage in acetabulum (ultrasound catheter in anterolateral portal) and osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion in femoral caput (ultrasound catheter in anterior portal). The ultrasound catheter and arthroscope were inserted into the hip by use of the anterior and anterolateral portals. Measurement of OCD lesion depth, as well as evaluation of the integrity of the cartilage inner structures and subchondral bone, was possible with the arthroscopic ultrasound technique. Furthermore, the calculation of quantitative parameters reflecting the status of the cartilage layer was possible. The quantitative ultrasound parameters are shown above the ultrasound images. (AIB, apparent integrated backscattering; R, reflection coefficient; URI, ultrasound roughness index.)
Fig 3Retrograde drilling of a right hip osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion was possible under arthroscopic ultrasound guidance. (A) Arthroscopic view of OCD lesion from anterolateral portal. (B) Ultrasound image of OCD lesion in coronal plane, showing drill underneath cartilage surface (dashed red box). The ultrasound (US) catheter was inserted into the joint from the anterior portal. (C) Fluoroscopic image of hip (posterior-anterior direction) showing ultrasound (US) catheter, arthroscope, and drill.
Pearls, Tips, and Pitfalls
| Pearls |
| A large capsulotomy enhances the mobility of the US catheter. |
| The catheter may be guided with a slotted cannula and arthroscopic hook. |
| Accurate imaging of OCD and monitoring of retrograde drilling are possible with UA. |
| Pitfalls |
| The tip of the US catheter requires delicate handling. |
| Experience in performing US imaging is needed for correct interpretation of US images. |
OCD, osteochondritis dissecans; UA, ultrasound arthroscopy; US, ultrasound.
Advantages and Disadvantages
| Advantages |
| High-resolution images from inner structures of articular cartilage and subchondral bone |
| Real-time imaging |
| No ionizing radiation |
| Quantitative assessment of articular cartilage and subchondral bone |
| Disadvantages |
| Technique not optimized for musculoskeletal imaging |
| Fragile catheters |
| Limited imaging depth |
| Steep learning curve |
| Additional costs |