Literature DB >> 25023111

Ultrasound arthroscopy of human knee cartilage and subchondral bone in vivo.

Jukka Liukkonen1, Petri Lehenkari2, Jukka Hirvasniemi3, Antti Joukainen4, Tuomas Virén5, Simo Saarakkala6, Miika T Nieminen7, Jukka S Jurvelin8, Juha Töyräs9.   

Abstract

Arthroscopic ultrasound imaging enables quantitative evaluation of articular cartilage. However, the potential of this technique for evaluation of subchondral bone has not been investigated in vivo. In this study, we address this issue in clinical arthroscopy of the human knee (n = 11) by determining quantitative ultrasound (9 MHz) reflection and backscattering parameters for cartilage and subchondral bone. Furthermore, in each knee, seven anatomical sites were graded using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) system based on (i) conventional arthroscopy and (ii) ultrasound images acquired in arthroscopy with a miniature transducer. Ultrasound enabled visualization of articular cartilage and subchondral bone. ICRS grades based on ultrasound images were higher (p < 0.05) than those based on conventional arthroscopy. The higher ultrasound-based ICRS grades were expected as ultrasound reveals additional information on, for example, the relative depth of the lesion. In line with previous literature, ultrasound reflection and scattering in cartilage varied significantly (p < 0.05) along the ICRS scale. However, no significant correlation between ultrasound parameters and structure or density of subchondral bone could be demonstrated. To conclude, arthroscopic ultrasound imaging had a significant effect on clinical grading of cartilage, and it was found to provide quantitative information on cartilage. The lack of correlation between the ultrasound parameters and bone properties may be related to lesser bone change or excessive attenuation in overlying cartilage and insufficient power of the applied miniature transducer.
Copyright © 2014 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; Articular cartilage; High frequency; Imaging; International Cartilage Repair Society score; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Subchondral bone; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25023111     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  6 in total

1.  Regular chondrocyte spacing is a potential cause for coherent ultrasound backscatter in human articular cartilage.

Authors:  Daniel Rohrbach; Satu I Inkinen; Jana Zatloukalová; Anke Kadow-Romacker; Antti Joukainen; Markus K Malo; Jonathan Mamou; Juha Töyräs; Kay Raum
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Diagnosis of Knee Osteochondral Lesions With Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Pekko Penttilä; Jukka Liukkonen; Antti Joukainen; Tuomas Virén; Jukka S Jurvelin; Juha Töyräs; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-09-14

Review 3.  Nondestructive Techniques to Evaluate the Characteristics and Development of Engineered Cartilage.

Authors:  Joseph M Mansour; Zhenghong Lee; Jean F Welter
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  In Vivo Evaluation of the Potential of High-Frequency Ultrasound for Arthroscopic Examination of the Shoulder Joint.

Authors:  Jani Puhakka; Isaac O Afara; Teemu Paatela; Markus J Sormaala; Matti A Timonen; Tuomas Virén; Jukka S Jurvelin; Juha Töyräs; Ilkka Kiviranta
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Ultrasound Arthroscopy of Hip in Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans.

Authors:  Antti Joukainen; Tuomas Virén; Pekko Penttilä; Jukka Liukkonen; Pia Henriikka Puhakka; Heikki Kröger; Juha Töyräs
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-07-17

6.  Laser-ultrasonic delivery of agents into articular cartilage.

Authors:  Heikki J Nieminen; Gonçalo Barreto; Mikko A Finnilä; Alejandro García-Pérez; Ari Salmi; Sanjeev Ranjan; Kari K Eklund; Kenneth P H Pritzker; Simo Saarakkala; Edward Hæggström
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.