Literature DB >> 28970711

Is Portal Venous Pressure or Porto-systemic Gradient Really A Harbinger of Poor Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation?

Amol Vijay Kanetkar1, Dinesh Balakrishnan1, Sudhindran Sudhindran1, Puneet Dhar1, Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishnan1, Ramachandran Menon1, Othiyil Vayoth Sudheer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Portal hyperperfusion as a cause of small for size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains controversial. Portal venous pressure (PVP) is often measured indirectly and may be confounded by central venous pressure (CVP).
METHODS: In 42 adult cirrhotics undergoing elective LDLT, PVP was measured by direct canulation of portal vein and porto systemic gradient (PSG) was obtained after subtracting CVP from PVP. None underwent portal inflow modulation. SFSS was looked in 27 patients after excluding 15 with technical complications.
RESULTS: Clinical features of SFSS found in 6 patients, 5 with graft recipient weight ratio (GRWR) > 0.8% and PVP < 20 mm of Hg. One with GRWR < 0.8% could truly be labeled as SFSS. Incidence of SFSS was not higher in patients with elevated PVP > 20 mm of Hg (14.3% vs 0%, P = 0.259) or PSG > 13 mm of Hg (33.3% vs 0%, P = 0.111). Intensive care unit (ICU) stay was longer in patients with elevated PVP (14.55 vs 9.13 days, P = 0.007) and PSG (16.8 vs 9.72 days, P = 0.009). There was no difference in graft functions, post-operative complications and mortality in first month post-LDLT.
CONCLUSION: Elevated PVP or PSG increased morbidity but neither predicted SFSS nor affected survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CTP, Child Turcot Pugh; CVP, central venous pressure; GRWR, graft to recipient weight ratio; HAT, hepatic artery thrombosis; INR, International Normalized Ratio; LDLT, living donor liver transplant; MELD, Model for End Stage Liver Disease; MHV, middle hepatic vein; N, total number; P, probability value; PNF, primary non-function; PSG, porto systemic gradient; PVP, portal venous pressure; PVT, portal vein thrombosis; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; SD, standard deviation; SFSS, small for size syndrome; SGOT, serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase; SGPT, serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase; cirrhosis; graft recipient weight ratio; small for size syndrome

Year:  2017        PMID: 28970711      PMCID: PMC5620358          DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2017.01.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol        ISSN: 0973-6883


  8 in total

Review 1.  Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications.

Authors:  Felix Dahm; Panco Georgiev; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Critical graft size in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: impact of the recipient's disease.

Authors:  M Ben-Haim; S Emre; T M Fishbein; P A Sheiner; C A Bodian; L Kim-Schluger; M E Schwartz; C M Miller
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Interpostion vein graft in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  K W Lee; D S Lee; H H Lee; J W Joh; S H Choi; J S Heo; S K Lee; S J Kim
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors.

Authors:  T Kiuchi; M Kasahara; K Uryuhara; Y Inomata; S Uemoto; K Asonuma; H Egawa; S Fujita; M Hayashi; K Tanaka
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Changes in portal venous pressure in the early phase after living donor liver transplantation: pathogenesis and clinical implications.

Authors:  Takashi Ito; Tetsuya Kiuchi; Hidekazu Yamamoto; Fumitaka Oike; Yasuhiro Ogura; Yasuhiro Fujimoto; Kazuhiro Hirohashi; And Koichi Tanaka
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living related liver donors: correlation between CT and histologic findings.

Authors:  Piyaporn Limanond; Steven S Raman; Charles Lassman; James Sayre; R Mark Ghobrial; Ronald W Busuttil; Sammy Saab; David S K Lu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Hepatic venoplasty in right lobe live donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Chi-Leung Liu; Yi Zhao; Chung-Mau Lo; Sheung-Tat Fan
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 8.  Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group.

Authors:  Rinaldo Bellomo; Claudio Ronco; John A Kellum; Ravindra L Mehta; Paul Palevsky
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Feasibility of using marginal liver grafts in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Xiang Lan; Hua Zhang; Hong-Yu Li; Ke-Fei Chen; Fei Liu; Yong-Gang Wei; Bo Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.