Literature DB >> 28970613

Assessment of a Pharmaceutical Advertisement Analysis Module in a Drug Literature Evaluation Course.

Mohamed Ezzat Khamis Amin1, Youssef Fattouh1.   

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the impact of an educational module on students' self-efficacy when analyzing the content of promotional drug brochures (PDBs) and to assess the students' value of PDBs' as an educational tool. Methods. Third-year bachelor of pharmacy students participated in a one-hour lecture and a two-hour laboratory. Students completed a survey before and after participating in the module. Results. The module elicited a statistically significant change in students' self-efficacy beliefs regarding evaluating promotional drug brochures, while the average perceived value of promotional drug brochures did not change significantly after the module. Conclusion. A brief educational module can increase students' self-efficacy in evaluating the content of PDBs.

Keywords:  Pharmaceutical promotion; drug literature evaluation; pharmaceutical advertisement; pharmacy students

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28970613      PMCID: PMC5607722          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe816112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  13 in total

Review 1.  Academic detailing.

Authors:  P R Shankar; N Jha; R M Piryani; O Bajracharya; R Shrestha; H S Thapa
Journal:  Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

2.  Banning all drug promotion is the best option pending major reforms.

Authors:  Peter R Mansfield
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Critical evaluation of the claims made by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotional material in Pakistan.

Authors:  Dileep Kumar Rohra; Anwarul Hassan Gilani; Ismail Kamal Memon; Ghazala Perven; Muhammad Talha Khan; Hina Zafar; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.327

4.  Pharmacy students' knowledge, attitudes, and evaluation of direct-to-consumer advertising.

Authors:  Rupali K Naik; Matthew E Borrego; Gireesh V Gupchup; Melanie Dodd; Mike R Sather
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  ASHP guidelines on the pharmacist's role in providing drug information.

Authors:  Shadi Ghaibi; Heather Ipema; Michael Gabay
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 6.  Principles and uses of academic detailing to improve the management of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  S B Soumerai
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.210

7.  A cross-sectional evidence-based review of pharmaceutical promotional marketing brochures and their underlying studies: is what they tell us important and true?

Authors:  Roberto Cardarelli; John C Licciardone; Lockwood G Taylor
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 8.  Medical students' exposure to and attitudes about the pharmaceutical industry: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kirsten E Austad; Jerry Avorn; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Evaluating the reliability and accuracy of the promotional brochures for the generic pharmaceutical companies in Iraq using World Health Organization guidelines.

Authors:  Ehab Mudher Mikhael
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

10.  A Critical Analysis of Claims and Their Authenticity in Indian Drug Promotional Advertisements.

Authors:  Gurpreet Kaur Randhawa; Navyug Raj Singh; Jaswant Rai; Gobindnoor Kaur; Resham Kashyap
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2015-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.