Literature DB >> 17998983

Pharmacy students' knowledge, attitudes, and evaluation of direct-to-consumer advertising.

Rupali K Naik1, Matthew E Borrego, Gireesh V Gupchup, Melanie Dodd, Mike R Sather.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess pharmacy students' knowledge, attitudes, and evaluation of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA).
METHODS: A cross sectional, self-administered, 106-item survey instrument was used to assess first, second, and third professional year pharmacy students' knowledge about DTCA regulations, attitudes toward DTCA, and evaluation of DTC advertisements with different brief summary formats (professional labeling and patient labeling) and in different media sources (print and television).
RESULTS: One hundred twenty (51.3%) of the 234 students enrolled participated in the study. The mean percentage knowledge score was 48.7% +/- 12.5%. Based on the mean scores per item, pharmacy students had an overall negative attitude toward DTC advertisements. Students had an overall negative attitude toward television and print advertisements using the professional labeling format but an overall positive attitude toward the print advertisement using the patient labeling format.
CONCLUSIONS: Lectures discussing DTC advertising should be included in the pharmacy curriculum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct-to-consumer advertising; pharmacy students; prescription drug advertising

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17998983      PMCID: PMC2064884          DOI: 10.5688/aj710586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  7 in total

1.  A fifth of Americans contact their doctor as a result of drug advertising.

Authors:  Scott Gottlieb
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-19

2.  Student understanding of the relationship between the health professions and the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  Michael S Monaghan; Kimberly A Galt; Paul D Turner; Bruce L Houghton; Eugene C Rich; Ronald J Markert; Brenda Bergman-Evans
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Television advertisement format and the provision of risk information about prescription drug products.

Authors:  Lewis H Glinert; Jon C Schommer
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2005-06

4.  Missing data in Likert ratings: A comparison of replacement methods.

Authors:  R G Downey; C King
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1998-04

5.  Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising and the public.

Authors:  R A Bell; R L Kravitz; M S Wilkes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The opinions and experiences of family physicians regarding direct-to-consumer advertising.

Authors:  M S Lipsky; C A Taylor
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Physicians report on patient encounters involving direct-to-consumer advertising.

Authors:  Joel S Weissman; David Blumenthal; Alvin J Silk; Michael Newman; Kinga Zapert; Robert Leitman; Sandra Feibelmann
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of a Pharmaceutical Advertisement Analysis Module in a Drug Literature Evaluation Course.

Authors:  Mohamed Ezzat Khamis Amin; Youssef Fattouh
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  An Elective Course for Student Pharmacists on Pharmaceutical Industry Practice.

Authors:  Bobby Jacob; Samuel K Peasah
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Regulation of medicines advertisement in Zimbabwe: an assessment of the impact of pharmaceutical promotion on the prescribing behaviour of healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Tafadzwa Collins Semu; Bernard Ngara; Tinashe Mudzviti
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  A survey of perceptions and attitudes about direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs among college students in South Korea.

Authors:  Young-Mo Yang; Jae-Joon Lee; Eun Jeong; Sun Young Kim; Mi Ah Han; Eun Joo Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.