Literature DB >> 28970543

Relationship Between Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Complications or Delivery Outcome.

Wenjia Yang1, Feifei Han1, Xueying Gao1, Yifei Chen1, Linong Ji2, Xiaoling Cai3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the association between gestational weight gain and delivery outcome or the morbidity of pregnancy complications. A total of 1,102 pregnant women who delivered at Peking University People's Hospital in China between January 2011 and December 2012 were included in this study. We divided them into 4 groups according to the baseline BMI quartiles and weight gain quartiles in different trimesters of pregnancy to analyse the status of delivery outcome and morbidity of pregnancy complications. Baseline BMI was significantly positive correlated with the morbidity of gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes. Weight gain in the second trimester of pregnancy was significantly positively correlated with the morbidity of macrosomia. Weight gain in the third trimester of pregnancy showed significantly positive correlation with the morbidity of macrosomia, and significantly negative correlation with the morbidity of neonatal death, preterm birth, gestational diabetes, and low birth-weight infant. Gestational weight gain showed significantly positive correlation with the morbidity of macrosomia and significantly negative correlation with neonatal death, stillbirth, gestational diabetes, preterm birth and low birth-weight infant. There is a correlation between baseline BMI, pregnancy weight gain and gestational complications, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and status of neonate in varying degrees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28970543      PMCID: PMC5624932          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12921-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

In China, inadequate body weight control has become a prominent health problem with changes in lifestyle. For pregnant women who are in a special physiological condition[1], appropriate pre-pregnancy weight and gestational weight gain (GWG) to meet the demands of mother and foetus is essential. Previous studies showed increasing pre-pregnant body mass index (BMI) was associated with increasing risk of gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)[2-5]. Women who are overweight or obese before pregnancy are subject to increased risk of macrosomia and dystocia[6-8]. Women who are underweight were less likely to have adverse pregnancy outcomes, but more likely to have intrauterine growth restricted infants[3]. GWG also affects obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Several studies suggest associations between excessive GWG and risk of hypertension, macrosomia, and caesarean section in pregnant women of different ethnics groups[9-13]. Inadequate GWG increased the risk of preterm birth and growth-restricted infants[10-12]. However, thus far, few studies have explored appropriate weight gain in different trimesters during pregnancy. In 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) provided specific recommendations regarding the ideal gestational weight gain according to the BMI categories[14]. However, the report was criticized by some health care providers saying that the recommendation was still too high for the obese women. In Japan, as there are more underweight women, the obesity classification is different, so the recommendation issued by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare on gestational weigh gain differs from that developed by IOM[15]. In China, we have been following the recommendation of IOM and there is no established recommendation for Chinese women. Because established recommendations on weight gain during pregnancy are inconsistent and contentious, ethnics groups, national conditions and many other factors should be taken into account for the recommendations, the aim of this study is to analyse the relevance between baseline BMI, gestational weight gain, and delivery outcome in a Chinese population.

Methods

Populations

All women who delivered at Peking University People’s Hospital in China between January 2011 and December 2012 were considered for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were women who had regular prenatal care and maintained complete data of prenatal care in Peking University People’s Hospital during 2011-2012. Exclusion criteria were women with insufficient information about their gestational weight during the pregnancy; multiple pregnancy. In all, 1,102 women were eligible for the final analysis. Data of women studied were extracted from Peking University People’s Hospital electronic medical records. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Peking University People’s Hospital. All of the health care procedures were carried out in accordance to the approved guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data collection and definitions of variables

The following data were collected from electronic medical records for each pregnant woman: maternal sociodemographic characteristics (age at delivery, height, parity), lifestyle behaviours (smoking and alcohol use), maternal weight at the 12th and 28th weeks of pregnancy and weight at delivery, laboratory and physical examination during the first prenatal care [alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum creatinine (Scr), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), uric acid (UA), fasting glucose, hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure], adverse pregnancy outcomes (abortion, induction of labour, neonatal death, stillbirth, preterm birth), accessory abnormality (abnormality of umbilical cord, amniotic fluid and placenta), obstetric complications (puerperal infection, dystocia), foetal abnormality (foetal distress, macrosomia, low birth-weight infant, foetal anomaly), complications of gestation [gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), gestational hypertension, preeclampsia/eclampsia]. Abortion in this study included threatened abortion and spontaneous abortion before 28th week with foetus weight less than 1,000 g. Neonatal death included early neonatal deaths or death of a baby within seven days of extra uterine life and deaths that occur after the first week of extrauterine life but within the first 28 days after birth. Preterm birth was defined as a birth before 37 weeks’ gestation. Stillbirth was defined as the in-utero death of a baby after 24 completed weeks’ gestation. Abnormality of umbilical cord included prolapse of umbilical cord, entanglement cord, umbilical cord knot and length abnormality (length < 30 cm or >80 cm). Abnormality of amniotic fluid included polyhydramnios (maximal deepest pocket ≥ 8 cm and/or amniotic fluid index ≥ 20 cm) and oligohydramnios(amniotic fluid index < 5 cm and/or maximal deepest pocket < 2 cm). Abnormality of placenta in our study referred to placental abruption, which was defined as the abnormal separation after 20 weeks of gestation and prior to birth. Puerperal infection was defined as genital tract infection in puerperium. Dystocia referred to difficult labour characterized by prolonged labour. Foetal distress was diagnosed as follows: (1) the meconium-stained amniotic fluid reached the second or third degree; (2) auscultate foetal heart rate twice or more during the contraction breaks, foetal heart rate was greater than 160 beats per minute or less than 120 beats per minute; (3) foetal heart electric monitor slows down, and variable deceleration appears frequently. The non-stress test baseline rate is abnormal, with decreased or no variation, or no response; (4) foetal movements less than three times per hour. Macrosomia was defined as a neonatal birthweight 4,000 g or more. Low birth-weight defined as a neonatal birthweight 2,500 g or less after 37 weeks. GDM (by 75-g oral glucose tolerance test) was diagnosed when at least one of the following was found: fasting blood glucose level of ≥92 mg/dL, blood glucose level at 1 hour of ≥180 mg/dL, blood glucose level at 2 hour ≥ 153 mg/dL during 24–28 weeks. Gestational hypertension was defined as a case in which hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg) developed after 20 weeks of gestation. Preeclampsia was defined by the onset of hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg) and proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation in a previously normotensive woman. Eclampsia was defined as the occurrence of convulsions and/or coma unrelated to other cerebral conditions in women with signs and symptoms of preeclampsia. The prenatal care records did not contain data on maternal weight before pregnancy, and body weight at 12th week was the first recorded weight, hence, we used the mother’s weight at 12th weeks as the first trimester weight to calculate baseline BMI. Weight at 28th week and 1 week prior to delivery was defined as second and third trimester weight, respectively. Weight gain during the second trimester was defined as the difference between first trimester and second trimester. Weight gain during the third trimester was defined as the difference between second trimester and third trimester. Maternal baseline BMI was categorized as underweight group (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight group (18.5 ≤ BMI < 24.0 kg/m2), overweight group (24.0 ≤ BMI < 28.0 kg/m2) and obesity group (BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m2) according to the “Guideline of controlling and prevention on overweight and obesity in China”[16]. Baseline BMI was also classified by WHO definition as underweight group (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight group (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25.0 kg/m2), overweight group (25.0 ≤ BMI < 29.0 kg/m2) and obesity group (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2)[14]. We further divided them into 4 groups according to weight gain quartiles in different trimesters of pregnancy.

Statistically analysis

SPSS version 19.0 was used for statistical analyses. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation if normally distributed. Categorical data were expressed as percentages. To compare variables between the different groups, an independent sample t-test was used for normally distributed continuous variables. Chi-squared tests were used for categorical variables. All P values were two-sided, and P values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Binary logistic regression analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to assess the association between the baseline BMI and delivery outcome or pregnancy complications adjusting for confounding variables, including age, serum glucose, blood pressure, smoking and alcohol use, Scr, liver function and level of lipid, which showed significant difference in the independent sample t-test. Association between weight gain in different trimesters and delivery outcome or pregnancy complication was also analysed.

Results

Characteristics of included pregnant women

A total of 1,102 pregnant women were included in this analysis. The average age of delivery for this population was 30.4 ± 3.3 years and baseline BMI was 21.6 ± 3.1 kg/m2. Table 1 shows grouping according to quartile for baseline BMI, weight in the first trimester, weight gain in the second trimester, weight gain in the third trimester, and GWG.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of pregnant women categorized by quartile for baseline BMI, weight in the first trimester, weight gain in the second trimester, weight gain in the third trimester, and GWG.

1st Quartile2nd Quartile3rd Quartile4th Quartile
Baseline BMI Quartile Category
Baseline BMI(kg/m2)18.1 ± 1.020.3 ± 0.522.1 ± 0.625.8 ± 2.4
Age(years)29.5 ± 3.230.4 ± 3.330.7 ± 3.231.2 ± 3.5
Fasting glucose(mmol/L)4.3 ± 0.54.3 ± 0.44.3 ± 0.44.4 ± 0.8
SBP(mmHg)107.6 ± 11.2110.5 ± 10.3112.5 ± 11.0116.2 ± 12.1
DBP(mmHg)69.8 ± 8.370.8 ± 8.171.9 ± 8.974.5 ± 8.5
ALT(U/L)17.5 ± 5.516.0 ± 18.017.5 ± 12.821.0 ± 23.2
AST(U/L)16.0 ± 7.218.1 ± 6.818.6 ± 6.218.9 ± 10.6
LDL-C(mmol/L)1.99 ± 0.402.26 ± 0.572.21 ± 0.532.45 ± 0.58
HDL-C(mmol/L)1.63 ± 0.291.65 ± 0.281.61 ± 0.411.53 ± 0.32
CRE(μmol/L)43.3 ± 6.544.7 ± 6.245.3 ± 6.944.7 ± 6.0
Weight Gain in the Second Trimester Quartile Category
weight gain in the second trimester(kg)−3.0–6.97.0–8.99.0–10.511.0–21.0
Age(years)31.2 ± 3.630.3 ± 3.230.6 ± 3.229.9 ± 3.4
Fasting glucose(mmol/L)4.3 ± 0.54.3 ± 0.44.3 ± 0.44.4 ± 8.3
SBP(mmHg)113.2 ± 17.3112.2 ± 11.6110.0 ± 11.4111.0 ± 10.7
DBP(mmHg)72.1 ± 10.972.4 ± 8.871.0 ± 8.871.6 ± 8.1
ALT(U/L)17.7 ± 18.315.4 ± 16.217.7 ± 18.919.0 ± 21.4
AST(U/L)18.3 ± 8.717.6 ± 7.018.5 ± 7.119.2 ± 9.2
LDL-C(mmol/L)2.36 ± 0.632.22 ± 0.532.17 ± 0.532.20 ± 0.52
HDL-C(mmol/L)1.55 ± 0.321.56 ± 0.411.59 ± 0.281.67 ± 0.32
CRE(μmol/L)44.2 ± 7.344.5 ± 5.744.7 ± 6.344.7 ± 6.8
Weight Gain in the Third Trimester Quartile Category
weight gain in the third trimester(kg/m2)−2.3–3.64.0–5.96.0–7.87.9–15.0
Age(years)30.7 ± 3.630.8 ± 3.330.2 ± 3.229.8 ± 3.2
Fasting glucose(mmol/L)4.3 ± 0.44.3 ± 0.44.3 ± 0.44.4 ± 0.8
SBP(mmHg)113.0 ± 12.4112.8 ± 12.0112.0 ± 10.4110.2 ± 11.9
DBP(mmHg)72.6 ± 9.672.1 ± 9.171.8 ± 7.971.0 ± 8.7
ALT(U/L)18.5 ± 16.117.5 ± 20.015.3 ± 10.617.7 ± 18.9
AST(U/L)18.7 ± 7.418.4 ± 9.117.7 ± 6.318.5 ± 7.1
LDL-C(mmol/L)2.44 ± 0.672.24 ± 0.502.17 ± 0.532.16 ± 0.54
HDL-C(mmol/L)1.57 ± 0.321.59 ± 0.321.59 ± 0.281.61 ± 0.32
CRE(μmol/L)44.1 ± 6.544.6 ± 5.944.4 ± 7.144.7 ± 6.3
Gestational Weight Gain Quartile Category
GWG(kg)1.0–11.812.0–14.615.0–17.718.0–29.0
Age(years)31.2 ± 3.630.8 ± 3.130.2 ± 3.229.8 ± 3.4
Fasting glucose(mmol/L)4.3 ± 0.44.3 ± 0.44.3 ± 0.44.4 ± 0.8
SBP(mmHg)114.5 ± 12.2116.7 ± 9.8118.5 ± 10.8119.2 ± 10.3
DBP(mmHg)73.4 ± 8.774.8 ± 7.975.9 ± 8.775.0 ± 8.7
ALT(U/L)18.1 ± 16.315.6 ± 14.217.8 ± 21.517.0 ± 14.2
AST(U/L)18.5 ± 8.317.8 ± 6.718.4 ± 8.818.3 ± 6.3
LDL-C(mmol/L)2.40 ± 0.662.19 ± 0.562.20 ± 0.422.17 ± 0.56
HDL-C(mmol/L)1.54 ± 0.341.58 ± 0.381.62 ± 0.291.64 ± 0.33
CRE(μmol/L)43.9 ± 6.644.8 ± 6.844.3 ± 6.044.7 ± 6.8
Baseline characteristics of pregnant women categorized by quartile for baseline BMI, weight in the first trimester, weight gain in the second trimester, weight gain in the third trimester, and GWG. Among 1,102 women, 214 (19.4%) women developed adverse pregnancy outcomes, including abortion (15.4%), induction of labour (0.5%), neonatal death (0.7%), stillbirth (0.4%), and preterm birth (4.9%); 480 (43.6%) women developed accessory abnormality, including abnormality of umbilical cord (32.0%), amniotic fluid (13.2%), and placenta (0.6%); 28 (2.4%) women developed obstetric complications, including dystocia (1.3%), and puerperal infection (1.3%); 244 (22.1%) foetuses developed foetal abnormality, including foetal distress (10.6%), macrosomia (7.5%), low birth-weight infant (4.4%), and foetal anomaly (1.1%); 201 (18.2%) women developed gestational complications, including GDM (13.1%), gestational hypertension (5.0%), and preeclampsia/eclampsia (1.9%).

Correlation between baseline BMI, weight gain in the second trimester, weight gain in the third trimester, GWG and pregnancy complications and delivery outcomes

Weight gain in the second trimester (P < 0.001=, GWG (P < 0.001=, neonate weight (P = 0.002), development of macrosomia (P = 0.029), morbidity of GDM (P = 0.017) and gestational hypertension (P < 0.001= significantly differed across the baseline BMI groups categorized by the “Guideline of controlling and prevention on overweight and obesity in China.” No significant association was found between baseline BMI and adverse pregnancy outcomes, accessory abnormality or obstetric complications. (Table 2) The analysis based on baseline BMI categorized by WHO criteria showed generally similar results. Moreover, there were significant differences in the outcomes of low-birth weight infant and induction of labour across the baseline BMI groups (P = 0.026). (Table 3)
Table 2

Correlation between baseline BMI and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome. (classified according to the “Guideline of controlling and prevention on overweight and obesity in China”)[16].

Baseline BMI(kg/m2)P value
BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 (n = 140)18.5 ≤ BMI < 24.0 kg/m2 (n = 650)24.0 ≤ BMI < 28.0 kg/m2 (n = 150)BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m2 (n = 39)
Weight gain in the second trimester (kg) 9.6 ± 2.9 9.3 ± 2.9 8.4 ± 2.8 7.4 ± 3.6 <0.001
Weight gain in the third trimester (kg)6.1 ± 2.56.2 ± 2.65.9 ± 2.85.4 ± 2.80.142
GWG (kg) 15.7 ± 4.0 15.5 ± 4.3 14.1 ± 4.5 13.0 ± 4.7 <0.001
Neonate weight (kg) 3.23 ± 0.42 3.33 ± 0.51 3.40 ± 0.58 3.26 ± 0.76 0.002
Abortion (n(%))18.6(26)14.5(94)16.7(25)12.8(5)0.592
Induction of labour (n(%))0(0)0.3(2)0.7(1)2.6(1)0.143
Neonatal death (n(%))1.4(2)0.6(4)0.7(1)0.0(0)0.710
Stillbirth (n(%))0.7(1)0.2(1)0.7(1)0.0(0)0.569
Preterm birth (n(%))4.3(10)4.5(10)6.8(11)7.7(17)0.557
Abnormality of umbilical cord (n(%))30.0(42)34.2(222)35.3(53)33.3(13)0.777
Abnormality of amniotic fluid (n(%))12.1(17)13.2(86)16.0(24)23.1(9)0.272
Abnormality of placenta (n(%))0.7(1)0.5(3)2.0(3)0.0(0)0.225
BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 (n = 140) 18.5 ≤ BMI < 24.0 kg/m 2 (n = 650) 24.0 ≤ BMI < 28.0 kg/m 2 (n = 150) BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m2 (n = 39) P value
Dystocia (n(%))0.7(1)1.2(8)1.3(2)2.6(1)0.827
Puerperal infection (n(%))0.0(0)1.2(8)2.7(4)0.0(0)0.188
Foetal distress (n(%))12.9(18)10.4(67)10.8(16)12.8(5)0.817
Macrosomia (n(%)) 2.9(4) 7.6(49) 10.1(15) 15.4(6) 0.029
Low-birth weight infant (n(%))2.9(4)4.3(28)4.7(7)12.8(5)0.068
Foetal anomaly (n(%))1.4(2)0.6(4)2.0(3)0.0(0)0.342
GDM (n(%)) 10.0(14) 12.0(78) 19.3(29) 23.1(9) 0.017
Gestational hypertension (n(%)) 2.9(4) 3.8(25) 9.3(14) 5.4(6) <0.001
Preeclampsia/eclampsia (n(%))0.7(1)2.5(16)0.7(1)2.6(1)0.335
Table 3

Correlation between baseline BMI and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome. (classified according to the WHO definition)[14].

Baseline BMI(kg/m2)P value
BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (n = 140)18.5 ≤ BMI <24.9 kg/m2 (n = 711)25.0 ≤ BMI <29.9 kg/m2 (n = 112)BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2 (n = 16)
Weight gain in the second trimester (kg) 9.6 ± 2.9 9.2 ± 2.9 8.2 ± 2.9 6.8 ± 3.3 <0.001
Weight gain in the third trimester (kg)6.1 ± 2.56.2 ± 2.65.7 ± 2.84.8 ± 2.70.072
GWG (kg) 15.7 ± 4.0 15.4 ± 4.4 13.9 ± 4.4 11.8 ± 3.2 <0.001
Neonate weight (kg) 3.23 ± 0.42 3.34 ± 0.52 3.33 ± 0.57 3.35 ± 1.04 0.020
Abortion (n(%))18.6(26)15.2(108)13.4(15)6.3(1)0.478
Induction of labour (n(%)) 0(0) 0.4(3) 0.0(0) 6.3(1) 0.002
Neonatal death (n(%))1.4(2)0.7(5)0.0(0)0.0(0)0.588
Stillbirth (n(%))0.7(1)0.3(2)0(0)0.0(0)0.760
Preterm birth (n(%))4.3(6)4.7(33)6.3(7)12.5(2)0.461
Abnormality of umbilical cord (n(%))30.0(42)34.2(243)37.5(42)18.8(3)0.354
Abnormality of amniotic fluid (n(%))12.1(17)13.6(97)18.8(21)6.3(1)0.336
Abnormality of placenta (n(%))0.7(1)0.6(4)1.8(2)0.0(0)0.541
BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (n = 140) 18.5 ≤ BMI <24.9 kg/m 2 (n = 711) 25.0 ≤ BMI <29.9 kg/m 2 (n = 112) BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2 (n = 16) P value
Dystocia (n(%))0.7(1)1.3(9)1.8(2)0.0(0)0.849
Puerperal infection (n(%))0.0(0)1.3(9)2.7(3)0.0(40)0.273
Foetal distress (n(%))12.9(18)10.5(74)10.7(12)12.5(2)0.858
Macrosomia (n(%)) 2.9(4) 8.1(57) 8.0(9) 25.0(4) 0.009
Low-birth weight infant (n(%)) 2.9(4) 4.2(30) 6.3(7) 18.8(3) 0.026
Foetal anomaly (n(%))1.4(2)1.0(7)0(0)0.0(0)0.655
GDM(n(%)) 10.0(14) 12.7(90) 17.9(20) 37.5(6) 0.008
Gestational hypertension (n(%)) 2.9(4) 4.1(29) 11.6(13) 18.8(3) <0.001
Preeclampsia/eclampsia (n(%))0.7(1)2.3(16)0.9(1)6.3(1)0.299
Correlation between baseline BMI and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome. (classified according to the “Guideline of controlling and prevention on overweight and obesity in China”)[16]. Correlation between baseline BMI and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome. (classified according to the WHO definition)[14]. Analysis on correlation between weight gain in the second trimester and pregnancy complications or delivery outcomes showed that weight gain in the second trimester was significantly and positively correlated with incident of macrosomia (P = 0.002). No significant association was found between weight gain in the second trimester and accessory abnormality, obstetric complications, or gestational complications. (Table 4) (Fig. 1A)
Table 4

Correlation between weight gain in the second trimester and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome.

weight gain in the second trimester (kg)P value
weight gain <7.0 (n = 148)7.0 ≤ weight gain <9.0(n = 222)9.0 ≤ weight gain <11.0(n = 210)weight gain ≥ 11.0 (n = 218)
Weight gain in the third trimester (kg)5.4 ± 2.56.0 ± 2.46.2 ± 2.76.6 ± 2.80.103
GWG(kg) 10.3 ± 2.9 13.7 ± 2.5 15.9 ± 2.7 19.3 ± 3.4 0.002
Neonate weight (kg)3.21 ± 0.573.27 ± 0.463.34 ± 0.493.45 ± 0.520.603
Baseline BMI (kg/m 2 ) 22.7 ± 3.5 21.5 ± 3.0 21.4 ± 3.0 21.2 ± 2.8 0.001
Abortion (n(%))14.5(25)14.0(36)16.3(41)17.4(46)0.689
Induction of labour (n(%))1.2(2)0.8(2)0(0)0(0)0.161
Neonatal death (n(%)) 1.7(3) 0(0) 0(0) 0(0) 0.004
Stillbirth (n(%))0.6(1)0(0)0(0)0(0)0.215
Preterm birth (n(%))7.1(12)3.9(10)2.8(7)6.1(16)0.138
Abnormality of umbilical cord (n(%))32.4(56)34.5(89)34.3(86)33.0(87)0.958
Abnormality of amniotic fluid (n(%))11.0(19)14.7(38)13.9(35)14.0(37)0.718
Abnormality of placenta (n(%))1.7(3)0.8(2)0.8(2)0.0(0)0.230
Dystocia (n(%))0.6(1)1.6(4)1.2(3)0.8(2)0.741
Puerperal infection (n(%))0.6(1)2.3(6)1.2(3)1.1(3)0.440
Foetal distress (n(%))10.0(17)13.6(35)11.2(28)9.1(24)0.399
weight gain <7.0 (n = 148) 7.0 ≤ weight gain <9.0(n = 222) 9.0 ≤ weight gain <11.0(n = 210) weight gain ≥ 11.0 (n = 218) P value
Macrosomia (n(%)) 6.5(11) 5.5(14) 5.6(14) 13.3(36) 0.002
Low-birth weight infant (n(%))7.6(13)4.3(11)4.4(11)3.0(8)0.161
Foetal anomaly (n(%))1.2(2)1.2(3)0.4(1)0.8(2)0.769
GDM (n(%))16.2(28)12.8(33)10.0(25)14.0(37)0.278
Gestational hypertension (n(%))4.0(7)2.7(7)6.8(17)6.1(16)0.139
Preeclampsia/eclampsia (n(%))2.3(4)2.3(6)1.2(3)2.3(6)0.765
Figure 1

Correlations between weight gain in different trimesters and GDM. (A) correlation between weight gain in the second trimester and GDM, (B) correlation between weight gain in the third trimester and GDM, (C) correlation between gestational weight gain and GDM. GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus.

Correlation between weight gain in the second trimester and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome. Correlations between weight gain in different trimesters and GDM. (A) correlation between weight gain in the second trimester and GDM, (B) correlation between weight gain in the third trimester and GDM, (C) correlation between gestational weight gain and GDM. GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus. Incidence of macrosomia in different groups categorized as weight gain in the third trimester quartiles showed a significant difference (P = 0.028). Weight gain in the third trimester was significantly and negatively correlated with incidence of neonatal death (P = 0.021), preterm birth (P < 0.001), low birth-weight infants (P = 0.003), and GDM (P < 0.001). (Fig. 1B) No significant association was found between weight gain in the third trimester and accessory abnormality or obstetric complications. (Table 5)
Table 5

Correlation between weight gain in the third trimester and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome.

weight gain in the third trimester(kg)P value
weight gain <4.0 (n = 153)4.0 ≤ weight gain <6.0 (n = 258)6.0 ≤ weight gain <7.9 (n = 260)weight gain ≥ 7.9 (n = 229)
Weight gain in the third trimester (kg)8.6 ± 3.08.9 ± 2.69.0 ± 3.09.9 ± 3.20.901
GWG (kg)11.2 ± 3.213.6 ± 2.715.5 ± 3.119.5 ± 4.00.151
Neonate weight (kg)3.24 ± 0.593.29 ± 0.473.33 ± 0.473.43 ± 0.470.079
Baseline BMI 22.1 ± 3.7 21.6 ± 3.0 21.6 ± 3.0 21.3 ± 2.7 <0.001
Abortion (n(%))15.5(28)16.5(51)15.0(46)14.6(39)0.926
Induction of labour (n(%))0.6(1)0(0)0.3(1)0.4(1)0.695
Neonatal death (n(%)) 1.1(2) 0(0) 0(0) 0(0) 0.021
Stillbirth (n(%))
Preterm birth (n(%)) 11.0(20) 4.5(14) 3.9(12) 1.5(4) <0.001
Abnormality of umbilical cord (n(%))33.1(60)33.7(104)33.3(102)34.0(91)0.998
Abnormality of amniotic fluid (n(%))10.5(19)12.6(39)13.1(40)17.9(48)0.112
Abnormality of placenta (n(%))0.6(1)1.0(3)0.3(1)0.4(1)0.707
Dystocia (n(%))2.2(4)1.3(4)0.7(2)1.5(4)0.529
Puerperal infection (n(%))1.1(2)1.3(4)1.0(3)1.9(5)0.813
Foetal distress (n(%))7.8(14)11.3(35)10.2(31)11.9(32)0.520
weight gain <4.0 (n = 153) 4.0 ≤ weight gain <6.0 (n = 258) 6.0 ≤ weight gain <7.9 (n = 260) weight gain ≥ 7.9 (n = 229) P value
Macrosomia (n(%)) 6.1(11) 4.9(15) 7.9(24) 11.3(30) 0.028
Low-birth weight infant (n(%)) 8.8(16) 3.6(11) 3.6(11) 1.9(5) 0.003
Foetal anomaly (n(%))1.7(3)1.0(3)1.0(3)0.4(1)0.586
GDM (n(%)) 21.0(38) 15.5(48) 9.8(30) 8.2(22) <0.001
Gestational hypertension (n(%))6.1(11)3.2(10)3.9(12)7.8(21)0.054
Preeclampsia/eclampsia (n(%))2.8(5)1.3(4)1.6(5)2.6(7)0.559
Correlation between weight gain in the third trimester and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome. We further analysed the association between gestational weight gain and different pregnancy complications or delivery outcomes. Results showed that gestational weight gain was significantly and positively correlated with incidence of macrosomia (P = 0.002) and negatively correlated with the neonatal death (P < 0.001), stillbirth (P = 0.007), preterm birth (P < 0.001), infants of low birth weight (P = 0.001), and GDM (P = 0.009). (Fig. 1C) (Table 6)
Table 6

Correlation between gestational weight gain and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome.

GWG (kg)P value
weight gain <12.0 (n = 162)12.0 ≤ weight gain <15.0 (n = 226)15.0 ≤ weight gain <18.0 (n = 221)weight gain ≥ 18.0 (n = 211)
Weight gain in the second trimester (kg) 5.8 ± 2.0 8.3 ± 1.7 9.6 ± 1.8 12.1 ± 2.6 0.001
Weight gain in the third trimester (kg) 3.8 ± 1.9 4.9 ± 1.6 6.5 ± 1.8 8.7 ± 2.5 <0.001
Neonate weight (kg)3.16 ± 0.653.30 ± 0.493.34 ± 0.483.46 ± 0.490.061
Baseline BMI (kg/m 2 ) 22.7 ± 3.5 21.5 ± 3.0 21.4 ± 3.0 21.3 ± 2.7 <0.001
Abortion (n(%))16.9 (33)12.1 (31)19.0 (52)14.2 (35)0.137
Induction of labour (n(%))1.5 (3)0.4 (1)0.0 (0)0.4 (1)0.136
Neonatal death (n(%)) 3.1 (6) 0.0 (0) 0.0 (0) 0.0 (0) <0.001
Stillbirth (n(%)) 1.5 (3) 0.0 (0) 0.0 (0) 0.0 (0) 0.007
Preterm birth (n(%)) 11.6 (22) 3.5 (9) 2.6 (7) 3.7 (9) <0.001
Abnormality of umbilical cord (n(%))34.9 (68)36.6 (94)30.8 (84)34.1 (84)0.552
Abnormality of amniotic fluid (n(%))11.3 (22)13.2 (34)14.3 (39)16.7 (41)0.425
Abnormality of placenta (n(%))1.5 (3)0.8 (2)0.7 (2)0.0 (0)0.306
Dystocia (n(%))0.5 (1)1.6 (4)0.4 (1)1.6 (4)0.355
weight gain < 12.0 (n = 162) 12.0 ≤ weight gain <15.0 (n = 226) 15.0 ≤ weight gain <18.0 (n = 221) weight gain ≥ 18.0 (n = 211) P value
Puerperal infection (n(%))1.0 (2)1.6 (4)1.1 (3)1.6 (4)0.917
Foetal distress (n(%))11.7 (22)9.0 (23)13.2 (36)10.2 (25)0.446
Macrosomia (n(%)) 5.3 (10) 5.9 (15) 6.6 (18) 13.5 (33) 0.002
Low-birth weight infant (n(%)) 10.0 (19) 3.9 (10) 3.7 (10) 2.5 (6) 0.001
Foetal anomaly (n(%))2.6 (5)0.4 (1)0.7 (2)0.8 (2)0.117
GDM (n(%)) 18.5 (36) 14.4 (37) 12.8 (35) 7.7 (19) 0.009
Gestational hypertension (n(%))3.1 (6)5.4 (14)5.1 (14)6.1 (15)0.525
Preeclampsia/eclampsia (n(%))2.6 (6)1.9 (5)1.1 (3)2.4 (6)0.632
Correlation between gestational weight gain and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome.

Multivariate regression analysis on the association between baseline BMI, weight gain and pregnancy complications or delivery outcomes

After adjusting for confounding factors, backwards stepwise multivariate regression model showed that baseline BMI was the independent risk factor for the development of gestational hypertension and macrosomia. Weight gain in the second trimester was the independent risk factor for the development of macrosomia. Gestational weight gain was the independent risk factor for the development of macrosomia. The odds ratio, 95% confidence interval (CI) and P value for each model are shown in Table 7.
Table 7

Multivariable regression analysis on the association between baseline BMI, weight gain and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome.

OR 95% CI P value
Baseline BMI
Macrosomia1.1311.035–1.2360.006
Gestational hypertension1.1561.044–1.2790.005
Weight gain in the second trimester
Macrosomia1.1451.027–1.2760.015
Weight gain in the third trimester
Preterm birth0.7700.646–0.9160.003
Low-birth weight infant0.8130.668–0.9900.028
GDM0.8280.743–0.9230.001
Gestational weight gain
Macrosomia1.0961.020–1.1780.013
Low-birth weight infant0.8900.793–0.9980.045
GDM0.9220.865–0.9820.011
Multivariable regression analysis on the association between baseline BMI, weight gain and pregnancy complications, delivery outcome.

Discussion

The present study showed a correlation between baseline BMI, pregnancy weight gain and gestational complications, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and status of neonate in varying degrees. Baseline BMI, weight gain in the second trimester and gestational weight gain were significantly, positively associated with macrosomia and its independent risk factor. Baseline BMI was also positively associated with GDM. Weight gain in the third trimester and gestational weight gain were significantly, negatively associated with development of GDM, preterm birth, low birth weight infant and neonatal death. In 2009, the Institute of Medicine in America re-examined the guideline on weight gain during pregnancy. The recommended range of gestational weight gain for women who are underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (BMI ranges from 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI ranges from 25 to 29.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI 30 ≥ kg/m2) was 12.5–18, 11.5–16, 7–11.5, 5–9 kg, respectively. In China, we have been following the recommendation of IOM and there is no established recommendation for Chinese women. Results from our study showed that the average gestational weight gain for included population was 15.3 kg. Gestational weight gain for women who were overweight and obese exceeded the recommended weight gain. This result partly reflected the current status of Chinese pregnant women. Analysis based on baseline BMI categorized by Chinese BMI criteria and WHO criteria showed generally similar results. However, there were differences in results of induction of labour and low-birth weight infant, which suggest that subgroup analysis were needed for establishing recommendations in Chinese women. Results from this study showed that the morbidity of GDM and gestational hypertension was positively correlated with baseline BMI. In multivariable regression analysis, baseline BMI was found to be the independent risk factor of macrosomia and gestational hypertension. These findings are consistent with results of previous studies. A large cohort study including 4,312 women comparing pre-pregnancy BMI categories with obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in Canada showed that compared to women with normal BMIs, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese women had an increased risk of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, GDM, and macrosomia[3]. Meta-analysis also indicated that high maternal weight is associated with a substantially higher risk of GDM[5]. Thus, strategies aimed at preventing obesity in young women and keeping appropriate preconception weight in pre-pregnant women are essential for the prevention of gestational complications. Our study showed potential correlations between neonatal death, stillbirth and gestational weigh gain in different trimesters and the overall GWG. However, neonatal death and stillbirth only occurred in the lowest weigh gain group, the small number of cases likely limited statistical power. Opinions from the Institute of Medicine in America suggested that for women who were underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese, recommended rates of weight gain in the second and third trimesters were 0.44–0.58 kg, 0.35–0.50 kg, 0.23–0.33 kg, 0.17–0.27 kg per week, respectively. In China, there are still no established recommendations for appropriate weight gain in the second and third trimester. Results from our study suggested that disproportionately low and excessive weight gain in the second and third trimester were associated with adverse obstetric outcomes, obstetric complications, abnormality of foetus, and gestational complications. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to explore the appropriate weight gain to achieve best pregnancy outcomes. However, GDM was shown to be negatively associated with weight gain during pregnancy. In multivariable regression analysis, weight gain in the third trimester and gestational weight gain were negatively associated with incidence of GDM. The potential reasons for this finding are as follows: the diagnosed test was done at 24th–28th week during the second trimester, pregnant women who have been diagnosed GDM may receive more advice about weight control and paid more attention to diet and exercise during the third trimester. As excessive weight gain might has already happened before the test, positive correlation was found between the second trimester weight gain and macrosomia. In addition, the metabolic disorder induced by GDM might influence weight gain during pregnancy. In this retrospective study, we analysed the association between baseline BMI, weight gain in different trimesters, gestational weight gain, and pregnancy complications and delivery outcomes. The study has several limitations. The included individuals were women with complete prenatal care data who had better compliance and made more effort in weight control compared with those pregnant women with worse compliance, which may cause selection bias in the study. Our study is designed as a single-centre, cross-sectional study. Pregnant women delivered in Peking University People’s Hospital might have unknown conditions and complications; thus, there is selection bias in this study. Moreover, BMI at baseline was calculated according to the weight at 12th week during pregnancy and did not indicate the pre-pregnancy status objectively.

Conclusions

There is correlation between baseline BMI, pregnancy weight gain, and gestational complications, including adverse pregnancy and status of neonate in varying degrees. Maintaining appropriate pre-pregnancy weight and gestational weight gain is essential in the prevention of pregnancy complications and prognosis of maternal and infant.
  13 in total

1.  The guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Chunming Chen; Frank C Lu
Journal:  Biomed Environ Sci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.118

2.  New criteria for 'obesity disease' in Japan.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.993

3.  Effect of prepregnancy body mass index categories on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Haim A Abenhaim; Robert A Kinch; Lucie Morin; Alice Benjamin; Robert Usher
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in 481 obese glucose-tolerant women.

Authors:  Dorte M Jensen; Per Ovesen; Henning Beck-Nielsen; Lars Mølsted-Pedersen; Bente Sørensen; Christina Vinter; Peter Damm
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Ke Rong; Kai Yu; Xiaolong Han; Ignatius M Y Szeto; Xueying Qin; Junkuan Wang; Yibing Ning; Peiyu Wang; Defu Ma
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  Weight gain during pregnancy: adherence to Health Canada's guidelines.

Authors:  Hélène Lowell; Doris C Miller
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.796

7.  Prepregnancy weight and adverse perinatal outcomes in an ethnically diverse population.

Authors:  Terry J Rosenberg; Samantha Garbers; Wendy Chavkin; Mary Ann Chiasson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Predictors and adverse outcomes of inadequate or excessive gestational weight gain in an Asian population.

Authors:  Huishan Koh; Tat Xin Ee; Rahul Malhotra; John Carson Allen; Thiam Chye Tan; Truls Østbye
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Maternal morbid obesity and obstetric outcomes.

Authors:  Nadine Farah; Niamh Maher; Sinead Barry; Mairead Kennelly; Bernard Stuart; Michael J Turner
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.942

10.  Maternal obesity and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Susan Y Chu; William M Callaghan; Shin Y Kim; Christopher H Schmid; Joseph Lau; Lucinda J England; Patricia M Dietz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  16 in total

1.  Association Between Maternal Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index, Gestational Weight Gain, and Offspring Atopic Dermatitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Aaron M Drucker; Eliza I Pope; Alison E Field; Abrar A Qureshi; Orianne Dumas; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2018-11-08

2.  Impact of pre-pregnancy body mass index, weight gain and blood lipid level during pregnancy on pregnancy outcome in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Heng Xu; Yan Ma; Lixia Zhang; Zhaoxia Liang; Danqing Chen
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-06-25

3.  Downregulation of lncRNA USP2‑AS1 in the placentas of pregnant women with non‑diabetic fetal macrosomia promotes trophoblast cell proliferation.

Authors:  Yiwen Lu; Qiuqin Tang; Shanshan Yang; Yuting Cheng; Mei Li; Dan Guo; Ziqiang Fu; Hua Jiang; Wei Wu
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.423

4.  Associations between pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Lirui Zhang; Wei Zheng; Cheng Liu; Xin Liang; Li Zhang; Zhihong Tian; Guanghui Li
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.320

5.  Periodontal status of women with excessive gestational weight gain and the association with their newborns' health.

Authors:  Bruno Gualtieri Jesuino; Gerson Aparecido Foratori-Junior; Alana Luiza Trenhago Missio; Leonardo Silva Mascoli; Silvia Helena de Carvalho Sales-Peres
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.607

6.  Factors associated with stillbirth in women with diabetes.

Authors:  Sharon T Mackin; Scott M Nelson; Sarah H Wild; Helen M Colhoun; Rachael Wood; Robert S Lindsay
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Incidence and trend of preterm birth in China, 1990-2016: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shiwen Jing; Chang Chen; Yuexin Gan; Joshua Vogel; Jun Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The Incidence of Pregnancy-Associated Cushing's Disease and Its Relation to Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Keyun Tang; Lin Lu; Ming Feng; Hanlin Zhang; Kang Chen; Xu Sun; Huijuan Zhu; Renzhi Wang; Zhaolin Lu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Association Between Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Complications or Adverse Delivery Outcomes in Chinese Han Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies: Validation of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2009 Guidelines.

Authors:  Lan Wang; Li Wen; Yangxi Zheng; Wenzheng Zhou; Lingwei Mei; Haoran Li; Chao Tong; Hongbo Qi; Philip N Baker
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-11-19

10.  Effectiveness of multimodal nutrition interventions during pregnancy to achieve 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew R Beauchesne; Kelly Copeland Cara; Jiawen Chen; Qisi Yao; Laura Paige Penkert; Wenfang Yang; Mei Chung
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.