Literature DB >> 28969238

A Comprehensive Approach Towards Quality and Safety in Diagnostic Imaging Services: Our Experience at a Rural Tertiary Health Care Center.

Viral Patel1, Geetika Sindhwani2, Monica Gupta3, Sweta Arora4, Arpita Mishra5, Jayesh Bhatt6, Manali Arora7, Anisha Gehani8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An organization's transformation from imple-mentation of small, distinct Quality Improvement (QI) efforts to complete incorporation of Quality Improvement Program (QIP) into its culture occurs through a process of churning the foundational elements over time. AIM: To develop a quality culture across the employees, identify measurable indicators and various tools to impart effective quality care and develop a learning culture for continuous quality improvement in the field of imaging services.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To establish a QIP, the bare minimum requirement started with forming a quality committee. The committee identified the areas of improvement and ascertaining the core principle of Quality Management System (QMS) by having a Quality Manual, Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's), work-instructions, identification and monitoring of quality indicators and a training calendar. Appropriate tools like formatted daily registers, periodic check lists, run charts etc., were developed to collect the data followed by multiple PDSA cycles (Plan, Do, Study and Act) which helped identify the process bottlenecks, followed by implementing solutions and reanalysis.
RESULTS: A total of 17 measurable key performance indicators were identified from the four major quality tasks namely Safety, Process Improvement, Professional Outcome and Satisfaction, to assess the performance measures and targets of QIP.
CONCLUSION: Diagnostic services should evaluate how to choose the most appropriate method and develop a comprehensive QIP to meet the needs of the staff and the end users, thus, creating a working environment, where people constitutes the intrinsic value in attaining the ultimate quality and safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous quality improvement; Diagnostic imaging; Key performance indicators; Quality improvement programme; Radiology

Year:  2017        PMID: 28969238      PMCID: PMC5620879          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/29545.10354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  25 in total

Review 1.  Quality initiatives: Quality improvement in radiology: basic principles and tools required to achieve success.

Authors:  Jonathan B Kruskal; Ronald Eisenberg; Jacob Sosna; Chun Sham Yam; Joshua D Kruskal; Phillip M Boiselle
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 2.  Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction.

Authors:  Leonard Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Quality initiatives: developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer.

Authors:  C Daniel Johnson; Karl N Krecke; Rafael Miranda; Catherine C Roberts; Charles Denham
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Quality initiatives* radiation risk: what you should know to tell your patient.

Authors:  Francis R Verdun; François Bochud; François Gundinchet; Abbas Aroua; Pierre Schnyder; Reto Meuli
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 5.  Practice policy and quality initiatives: strategies for optimizing staff safety in a radiology department.

Authors:  Bettina Siewert; Olga R Brook; Misti M Mullins; Ronald L Eisenberg; Jonathan B Kruskal
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Fool me twice: delayed diagnoses in radiology with emphasis on perpetuated errors.

Authors:  Young W Kim; Liem T Mansfield
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media.

Authors:  S T Cochran; K Bomyea; J W Sayre
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Radiology scheduling: preferences of users of radiologic services and impact on referral base and extension.

Authors:  Biswita C Mozumdar; Douglas Neal Hornsby; Adheet S Gogate; Lisa A Intriere; Richard Hanson; Karen McGreal; Pauline Kelly; Pablo Ros
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 9.  Mapping turnaround times (TAT) to a generic timeline: a systematic review of TAT definitions in clinical domains.

Authors:  Bernhard Breil; Fleur Fritz; Volker Thiemann; Martin Dugas
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Hand hygiene: back to the basics of infection control.

Authors:  Purva Mathur
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Lancet Commission on diagnostics: transforming access to diagnostics.

Authors:  Kenneth A Fleming; Susan Horton; Michael L Wilson; Rifat Atun; Kristen DeStigter; John Flanigan; Shahin Sayed; Pierrick Adam; Bertha Aguilar; Savvas Andronikou; Catharina Boehme; William Cherniak; Annie Ny Cheung; Bernice Dahn; Lluis Donoso-Bach; Tania Douglas; Patricia Garcia; Sarwat Hussain; Hari S Iyer; Mikashmi Kohli; Alain B Labrique; Lai-Meng Looi; John G Meara; John Nkengasong; Madhukar Pai; Kara-Lee Pool; Kaushik Ramaiya; Lee Schroeder; Devanshi Shah; Richard Sullivan; Bien-Soo Tan; Kamini Walia
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  An introduction to key performance indicators for medical physicists.

Authors:  Dominic J DiCostanzo; Lalith K Kumaraswamy; Jillian Shuman; Daniel C Pavord; Yanle Hu; David W Jordan; Christopher Waite-Jones; Annie Hsu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.243

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.