| Literature DB >> 28968755 |
Paul J McLaren1,2, Sara L Pulit3, Deepti Gurdasani4,5, Istvan Bartha6, Patrick R Shea7, Cristina Pomilla4,5, Namrata Gupta8, Effrossyni Gkrania-Klotsas9, Elizabeth H Young4,5, Norbert Bannert10, Julia Del Amo11, M John Gill12, Jill Gilmour13, Paul Kellam4,14, Anthony D Kelleher15, Anders Sönnerborg16, Robert Zangerle17, Frank A Post18, Martin Fisher19, David W Haas20, Bruce D Walker21,22, Kholoud Porter23, David B Goldstein7, Manjinder S Sandhu4,5, Paul I W de Bakker3,24, Jacques Fellay6,25.
Abstract
Background: Previous genetic association studies of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) progression have focused on common human genetic variation ascertained through genome-wide genotyping.Entities:
Keywords: HIV host dependency factors; HIV-1 control; HIV-1 progression; exome sequencing; host genetics of infection
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28968755 PMCID: PMC5853944 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix470
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect Dis ISSN: 0022-1899 Impact factor: 5.226
Study Designs and Sample Numbers Included
| Study design | Description | n cases | n controls | n total | Phenotype class | Contributors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural history | HIV+ patients with spVL selected from full phenotype distribution | na | na | 392 | quantitative | Swiss HIV Cohort Study |
| HIV extreme vs population | HIV elite controllers compared to a mixed sample of HIV+ and HIV negative | 191 (HIV-EC) | 428 (63 HIV+) | 619 | binary | International HIV Controllers Study, AIDS Clinical Trials Group, Autism Sequence Consortium |
| HIV extreme | HIV controllers compared to HIV rapid progressors | 130 (HIV-C) | 186 (HIV-RP) | 316 | binary | CASCADE, Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, HIV Genomics Consortium |
Abbreviations: HIV-EC, HIV elite controllers; HIV-C, HIV controllers; HIV-RP, HIV rapid progressors; spVL, set point viral load; na, not applicable.
Figure 1.Meta-analysis of association results with HIV load for 55714 variants. A, Quantile–quantile plot showing observed −log10(P) vs expected −log10(P) under the null hypothesis. The bulk of the observed P-value distribution (black diamonds) is in line with the null expectation (dashed red line) and the genomic inflation factor (median observed chi square statistics divided by expected) is approximately 1 (λ = 1.05). This suggests very little inflation in the test statistic dues to confounding factors. Axes are truncated at P <1 × 10−7. B, Manhattan plot. Per variant association P values (−log10 transformed) are plotted (y axis, colored diamonds) by chromosomal position (x axis). Only variants within the MHC region show significant associations after correcting for multiple testing (P <9 × 10−7, dashed line).
Figure 2.Association results of gene-based testing. Quantile–quantile plots of observed −log10(P) (diamonds, y axis) vs −log10(P) expected under the null hypothesis (red dashed line). Analysis was performed including all variants regardless of predicted function (A), only variants predicted to modify the protein (B), and only variants predicted to highly impact the protein structure (C). Only genes within the MHC were associated after correcting for multiple comparisons. The distribution of P values of non-MHC genes (blue diamonds) closely follows the expected null distribution.
Set Test Association Results for HIV Dependency Factor Genes
| Gene set | n genes |
All variants ( |
Protein changing variants ( |
High impact ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All HDFs | 496 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.73 |
| CRISPR | 5 | 0.24 | 0.10 | 0.31 |
| siRNA FDR <0.2 | 492 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.75 |
| siRNA FDR <0.05 | 91 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.81 |
| Mediator complex | 26 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.11 |
| Nuclear pore complex | 27 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.36 |
Abbreviations: FDR, false discovery rate; HDFs, HIV dependency factors.