| Literature DB >> 28968510 |
Lilian Muniz Camilo1, Vera Lucia Pereira-Chioccola2, Ricardo Gava1, Cristina da Silva Meira-Strejevitch1, Jose Ernesto Vidal3, Cinara Cássia Brandão de Mattos4, Fábio Batista Frederico5, Luiz Carlos De Mattos4, Lígia Cosentino Junqueira Franco Spegiorin6.
Abstract
Symptomatic forms of toxoplasmosis are a serious public health problem and occur in around 10-20% of the infected people. Aiming to improve the molecular diagnosis of symptomatic toxoplasmosis in Brazilian patients, this study evaluated the performance of real time PCR testing two primer sets (B1 and REP-529) in detecting Toxoplasma gondii DNA. The methodology was assayed in 807 clinical samples with known clinical diagnosis, ELISA, and conventional PCR results in a 9-year period. All samples were from patients with clinical suspicion of several features of toxoplasmosis. According to the minimum detection limit curve (in CT), REP-529 had greater sensitivity to detect T. gondii DNA than B1. Both primer sets were retrospectively evaluated using 515 DNA from different clinical samples. The 122 patients without toxoplasmosis provided high specificity (REP-529, 99.2% and B1, 100%). From the 393 samples with positive ELISA, 146 had clinical diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and positive conventional PCR. REP-529 and B1 sensitivities were 95.9% and 83.6%, respectively. Comparison of REP-529 and B1 performances was further analyzed prospectively in 292 samples. Thus, from a total of 807 DNA analyzed, 217 (26.89%) had positive PCR with, at least one primer set and symptomatic toxoplasmosis confirmed by clinical diagnosis. REP-529 was positive in 97.23%, whereas B1 amplified only 78.80%. After comparing several samples in a Brazilian referral laboratory, this study concluded that REP-529 primer set had better performance than B1 one. These observations were based after using cases with defined clinical diagnosis, ELISA, and conventional PCR.Entities:
Keywords: Diagnosis; Real-time polymerase chain reaction; Symptomatic toxoplasmosis; Toxoplasma gondii
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28968510 PMCID: PMC9425505 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.07.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Infect Dis ISSN: 1413-8670 Impact factor: 3.257
Fig. 1Design and genes location of primer sets used in this study. (A) cPCR (B22-B23), (B) qPCR B1, and (C) qPCR REP-529. The analyses were done in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/primertool.cgi?ctg_time=1486921082&job_key=1N4LxE9DQutl1VjQVbB84i-rbdACuHbNAw&CheckStatus=Check for B22/B23; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/primertool.cgi?ctg_time=1486924834&job_key=l51I5ugp5YHCu3W-eN5RjALFQL4v1lujLg for (B1), and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/primertool.cgi?ctg_time=1487009304&job_key=ycMWuJUKmKK_mAidBf0sr3_mPZ1S9SaAUw&CheckStatus=Check for REP-529. The schemes were based on Lin et al.
Fig. 2Standard curve of T. gondii, tachyzoites using REP-529 (A) and B1 (B) primer sets, respectively using the hydrolysis probe FAM dye-labeled. Results are shown as mean cycle threshold (C) obtained from triplicate of each DNA concentration. Standard curve analysis was done in 10-fold serial dilutions of DNA extracted from tachyzoites, at initial concentration of 35 ng/μL (1 × 107 tachyzoites). For REP-529, R2 = 0.9923 and B1, R2 = 0.9985.
Summary of retrospective of qPCR analysis employing REP-529 and B1 primer sets in 515 DNA samples with results in clinical diagnosis, ELISA, and cPCR (B22-B23).
| Clinical samples | Results | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serological diagnosis (ELISA) | cPCR (B22-B23) | qPCR (REP-529) | qPCR (B1) | ||||||
| Negative | Positive | Negative | Positive | % | Negative | Positive | % | ||
| Negative | 122 | 122 | 0 | 121 | 1 | 99.2 | 122 | 0 | 100 |
| Positive | 393 | 247 | 146 | 253 | 140 | 95.9 | 281 | 122 | 83.6 |
| Total | 515 | 369 | 146 | 374 | 141 | – | 403 | 122 | – |
Percent of specificity was calculated as ratio of true negatives/true negatives + false positives × 100 (clinical diagnosis and ELISA results were considered gold standard method − 122 patients without toxoplasmosis).
Percent of sensitivity was calculated as ratio of true positives/true positives + false negatives × 100 (clinical diagnosis and cPCR were considered gold standard method).
Clinical and PCR results of the 807 clinical samples analyzed.
| Toxoplasmosis (clinical form) | Total number of clinical samples analyzed | Positive samples clinical, molecular, and serological diagnosis | % Positivity (both studies) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retrospective study (total – 515 samples) | Prospective study (total – 292) | Both studies (total – 807 samples) | |||
| Cerebral | 404 | 94 | 31 | 125 | 30.94 |
| Congenital | 125 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 12.80 |
| Gestational | 66 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 18.18 |
| Ocular | 193 | 21 | 25 | 46 | 23.83 |
| Disseminated (postmortem) | 19 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 94.74 |
| Total | 807 | 146 | 71 | 217 | 26.89 |
Characteristics of clinical samples, sensitivities of REP-529 and B1 considering the 217 positive samples.
| Clinical form ( | Sample | Total | REP-529 | B1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | % | Positive | % | |||
| Cerebral (125) | CSF | 49 | 49 | 100 | 41 | 83.67 |
| BL | 76 | 72 | 94.74 | 62 | 81.58 | |
| Congenital (16) | CSF | 3 | 3 | 100 | 2 | 66.67 |
| BL | 13 | 13 | 100 | 9 | 69.23 | |
| Gestational (12) | AF | 8 | 8 | 100 | 5 | 62.50 |
| BL | 4 | 4 | 100 | 3 | 75.00 | |
| Ocular (46) | BL | 46 | 44 | 95.65 | 36 | 78.26 |
| Disseminated (18) | AU | 18 | 18 | 100 | 13 | 72.22 |
| Total | 217 | 211 | 97.23 | 171 | 78.80 | |
At least one primer set positive.
Comparison between mean C values obtained with REP-529 and B1 qPCR considering the 217 positive samples.
| Clinical form ( | Sample | Total | Mean ± SEM ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REP-52 | B1 | Δ | ||||
| Cerebral (125) | CSF | 49 | 32.86 ± 0.43 (49) | 33.71 ± 0.40 (41) | 0.85 | 0.2420 (ns) |
| BL | 76 | 31.08 ± 0.54 (72) | 31.92 ± 0.51 (21) | 0.84 | 0.2830 (ns) | |
| Congenital (16) | CSF | 3 | 35.61 ± 0.22 (3) | 36.37 ± 1.67 (2) | 1.68 | 0.2628 (ns) |
| BL | 13 | 31.06 ± 1.06 (13) | 32.99 ± 1.13 (9) | 1.93 | 0.6757 (ns) | |
| Gestational (12) | AF | 8 | 34.69 ± 0.63 (8) | 36.13 ± 0.56 (3) | 1.44 | 0.0554 (ns) |
| BL | 4 | 35.02 ± 0.58 (4) | 36.36 ± 0.21 (2) | 1.34 | 0.0192 (ns) | |
| Ocular (46) | BL | 46 | 32.07 ± 0.62 (44) | 33.22 ± 0.66 (24) | 1.15 | 0.0225 (ns) |
| Disseminated (18) | AU | 18 | 30.92 ± 0.96 (18) | 31.27 ± 1.48 (10) | 0.35 | 0.2172 (ns) |
SEM (standard error of the mean).
Significant value at a p < 0.01.
Non-significant.
Concordance index between three markers for detecting T. gondii in clinical samples.
| Period of the study | Primer sets | Clinical samples with symptomatic toxoplasmosis | PCR results | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concordant | Discordant | Concordance index | |||
| B22-B23/REP-529/B1 | 146 | 122 | 24 | (83.56) | |
| 2008–2015 | B22-B23/REP-529 | 146 | 140 | 06 | (95.89) |
| B22-B23/B1 | 146 | 122 | 24 | (83.56) | |
| 2008–2016 | REP-529/B1 | 217 | 182 | 35 | (83.87) |
Positive in all markers.
Negative at least one marker.
Percents of concordant index were calculated as the ratio: (number of concordant results)/(number total of samples) × 100.
Number total of samples was based on results of 515 clinical samples with positive (146) and negative (369) results in cPCR (B22-B23) until 2015; and 807 clinical samples with positive (217) and negative (590) results in qPCR (REP529 and B1) (2008–2016).