Literature DB >> 28968171

Randomized Phase III and Extension Studies of Naldemedine in Patients With Opioid-Induced Constipation and Cancer.

Nobuyuki Katakami1, Toshiyuki Harada1, Toru Murata1, Katsunori Shinozaki1, Masakazu Tsutsumi1, Takaaki Yokota1, Masatsugu Arai1, Yukio Tada1, Masaru Narabayashi1, Narikazu Boku1.   

Abstract

Purpose Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent and debilitating adverse effect (AE) of opioids-common analgesics for cancer pain. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, naldemedine (S-297995), for OIC, specifically in patients with cancer. Patients and Methods This phase III trial consisted of a 2-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (COMPOSE-4) and an open-label, 12-week extension study (COMPOSE-5). In COMPOSE-4, eligible adults with OIC and cancer were randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to receive once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg or placebo. The primary end point was the proportion of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) responders (≥ 3 SBMs/week and an increase of ≥ 1 SBM/week from baseline). The primary end point of COMPOSE-5 was safety. Results In COMPOSE-4, 193 eligible patients were randomly assigned to naldemedine (n = 97) or placebo (n = 96). The proportion of SBM responders in COMPOSE-4 was significantly greater with naldemedine than with placebo (71.1% [69 of 97 patients] v 34.4% [33 of 96 patients]; P < .0001). A greater change from baseline was observed with naldemedine than with placebo in the frequency of SBMs/week (5.16 v 1.54; P < .0001), SBMs with complete bowel evacuation/week (2.76 v 0.71; P < .0001), and SBMs without straining/week (3.85 v 1.17; P = .0005). In COMPOSE-4, more patients treated with naldemedine than with placebo reported treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) (44.3% [43 of 97 patients] v 26.0% [25 of 96 patients]; P = .01); in COMPOSE-5, 105 (80.2%) of 131 of patients reported TEAEs. Diarrhea was the most frequently reported TEAE in COMPOSE-4 (19.6% [19 of 97 patients] v 7.3% [seven of 96 patients] with naldemedine v placebo) and COMPOSE-5 (18.3% [24 of 131 patients] with naldemedine). Naldemedine was not associated with signs or symptoms of opioid withdrawal and had no notable impact on opioid-mediated analgesia. Conclusion Once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg effectively treated OIC and was generally well tolerated in patients with OIC and cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28968171     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.0853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   50.717


  30 in total

Review 1.  Medical Therapy of Constipation: Current Standards and Beyond.

Authors:  Viola Andresen; Peter Layer
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 2.  Pathophysiology and management of opioid-induced constipation: European expert consensus statement.

Authors:  Adam D Farmer; Asbjørn M Drewes; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Roberto De Giorgio; Tony O'Brien; Bart Morlion; Jan Tack
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 3.  American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Medical Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation.

Authors:  Brian Hanson; Shazia Mehmood Siddique; Yolanda Scarlett; Shahnaz Sultan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Randomized phase 3 and extension studies: Efficacy and impacts on quality of life of naldemedine in subjects with opioid-induced constipation and cancer.

Authors:  N Katakami; T Harada; T Murata; K Shinozaki; M Tsutsumi; T Yokota; M Arai; Y Tada; M Narabayashi; N Boku
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Rates of appropriate laxative prophylaxis for opioid-induced constipation in veterans with lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Timothy J Brown; Neil Keshvani; Arjun Gupta; Hui Yang; Deepak Agrawal; Tri C Le; David E Gerber; Carlos A Alvarez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Mu-opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in people with cancer and people receiving palliative care.

Authors:  Bridget Candy; Louise Jones; Victoria Vickerstaff; Philip J Larkin; Patrick Stone
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-15

Review 7.  Gastrointestinal Motility Issues in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mehnaz A Shafi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-12-10

Review 8.  MASCC recommendations on the management of constipation in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Davies; Charlotte Leach; Ricardo Caponero; Andrew Dickman; David Fuchs; Judith Paice; Anton Emmanuel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Insights into the Use of Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonists (PAMORAs) in Oncologic Patients: from Scientific Evidence to Real Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ana Fernández-Montes; Guillermo de Velasco; Santiago Aguín; Cristina Farriols; María Guirado-Risueño; Vanessa G Jerviz-Guía; María Victoria Baeza-Nadal; Rodolfo Chicas-Sett; José Luis Fírvida; Francisco García-Navalón; Patricia Martín; Carmen Perezagua-Marín; Dulce Rodríguez; Joan Santamaría; Tamara Saurí; Manuel Cobo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-02-26

Review 10.  Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation and Bowel Dysfunction: Expert Opinion of an Italian Multidisciplinary Panel.

Authors:  Roberto De Giorgio; Furio Massimino Zucco; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Sebastiano Mercadante; Enrico Stefano Corazziari; Augusto Caraceni; Patrizio Odetti; Raffaele Giusti; Franco Marinangeli; Carmine Pinto
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.