Timothy J Brown1, Neil Keshvani1, Arjun Gupta2, Hui Yang3, Deepak Agrawal4,5, Tri C Le1,6, David E Gerber1,6,7, Carlos A Alvarez8,9,10. 1. Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 2. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 4. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA. 6. Harold C Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 7. Department of Population and Data Sciences, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 8. School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Carlos.Alvarez@ttuhsc.edu. 9. Department of Population and Data Sciences, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Carlos.Alvarez@ttuhsc.edu. 10. Pharmacy Department, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX, USA. Carlos.Alvarez@ttuhsc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common side effect in patient-prescribed opioids for cancer pain treatment. Current guidelines recommend routine prescription of a laxative for preventing OIC in all patients prescribed an opioid unless a contraindication exists. We determined patterns of prescription of laxative agents in patients with lung cancer initiating opioids. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the prescription of laxatives for OIC to adult patients with incident lung cancer seen in the Veteran's Affairs (VA) system, between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2016. Exposure to laxative agents was categorized as follows: none, docusate monotherapy, docusate plus another laxative, and other laxatives only. Prevalence of OIC prophylaxis was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Linear regression was performed to identify time trends in the prescription of OIC prophylaxis. RESULTS: Overall, 130,990 individuals were included in the analysis. Of these, 87% of patients received inadequate prophylaxis (75% no prophylaxis and 12% docusate alone), while 5% received OIC prophylaxis with the unnecessary addition of docusate to another laxative. Through the study period, laxative prescription significantly decreased, while all other categories of OIC prophylaxis were unchanged. We noted an inverse relationship with OIC prophylaxis and likelihood of a diagnosis of constipation at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of veterans with lung cancer, almost 90% received inadequate or inappropriate OIC prophylaxis. Efforts to educate physicians and patients to promote appropriate OIC prophylaxis in combination with systems-level changes are warranted.
PURPOSE: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common side effect in patient-prescribed opioids for cancer pain treatment. Current guidelines recommend routine prescription of a laxative for preventing OIC in all patients prescribed an opioid unless a contraindication exists. We determined patterns of prescription of laxative agents in patients with lung cancer initiating opioids. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the prescription of laxatives for OIC to adult patients with incident lung cancer seen in the Veteran's Affairs (VA) system, between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2016. Exposure to laxative agents was categorized as follows: none, docusate monotherapy, docusate plus another laxative, and other laxatives only. Prevalence of OIC prophylaxis was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Linear regression was performed to identify time trends in the prescription of OIC prophylaxis. RESULTS: Overall, 130,990 individuals were included in the analysis. Of these, 87% of patients received inadequate prophylaxis (75% no prophylaxis and 12% docusate alone), while 5% received OIC prophylaxis with the unnecessary addition of docusate to another laxative. Through the study period, laxative prescription significantly decreased, while all other categories of OIC prophylaxis were unchanged. We noted an inverse relationship with OIC prophylaxis and likelihood of a diagnosis of constipation at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of veterans with lung cancer, almost 90% received inadequate or inappropriate OIC prophylaxis. Efforts to educate physicians and patients to promote appropriate OIC prophylaxis in combination with systems-level changes are warranted.
Entities:
Keywords:
Lung cancer; Opioids; Palliative care; Supportive care
Authors: Leah L Zullig; George L Jackson; Raye Anne Dorn; Dawn T Provenzale; Rebecca McNeil; Catherine M Thomas; Michael J Kelley Journal: Mil Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Seth D Crockett; Katarina B Greer; Joel J Heidelbaugh; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Brian J Hanson; Shahnaz Sultan Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: L Abramowitz; N Béziaud; L Labreze; V Giardina; C Caussé; B Chuberre; F A Allaert; S Perrot Journal: J Med Econ Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 2.448
Authors: Arjun Gupta; Leonce Nshuti; Udhayvir S Grewal; Ramy Sedhom; Devon K Check; Helen M Parsons; Anne H Blaes; Beth A Virnig; Maryam B Lustberg; Ishwaria M Subbiah; Ryan D Nipp; Sydney M Dy; Stacie B Dusetzina Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-09-24