Literature DB >> 28967072

Visual outcomes after progressive apodized diffractive intraocular lens implantation.

Javier García-Bella1,2, Néstor Ventura-Abreu1,2, Laura Morales-Fernández1,2, Paula Talavero-González3, Jesús Carballo-Álvarez4, Juan Carlos Sanz-Fernández4, José M Vázquez-Moliní4, José M Martínez-de-la-Casa1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess photopic and mesopic vision in patients implanted with the Bi-Flex® M 677 MY bifocal intraocular lens (IOL).
METHODS: In this prospective clinical study, 25 patients with cataract in both eyes were subjected to cataract surgery and bilateral implantation of the Bi-Flex® M 677MY (Medicontur, Hungary) IOL. Three months after surgery, high-contrast photopic uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were determined. Intermediate at 65 cm (DCIVA) and near at 40 cm (DCNVA) visual acuity were also measured, both with best distance correction. The CSV-1000 test chart was used to assess contrast sensitivity (CS). Defocus curves were constructed under photopic and mesopic conditions, determining binocular best-corrected visual acuity over the range +1.50 D to -4.00 D in 0.50-D steps. A KR-1W Wavefront Analyzer was used to measure pupil size and aberrometric outcomes. Presence and type of dysphotopsia were evaluated with the Likert scale.
RESULTS: Mesopic mean pupil diameter was 4.58 ± 0.73 mm. The mean values at 3 months were UDVA 0.03 ± 0.09, CDVA -0.05 ± 0.06, DCIVA 0.20 ± 0.07, and DCNVA 0.11 ± 0.08. Mean CS for the 4 frequencies examined were 1.66 ± 0.16, 1.75 ± 0.14, 1.39 ± 0.22, and 0.96 ± 0.19. Significant differences were observed in defocus curves for photopic and mesopic conditions. A significant correlation between pupil diameter and the dysphotopic photopic was found (r = 0.62; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The evaluated progressive apodized diffractive design IOL provides effective restoration of visual function in far and near vision distance with an adequate intermediate visual quality between -1.00 and -1.50 focus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bi-Flex®; Intraocular lens; Multifocal; Outcomes; Visual

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28967072     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5001030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  6 in total

1.  Visual acuity and defocus curves with six multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Miguel A Gil; Consuelo Varón; Genis Cardona; José A Buil
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of three different presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Valerii Serdiuk; Svetlana Ustymenko; Svetlana Fokina; Ivan Ivantsov
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

3.  The Influence of Angle Alpha, Angle Kappa, and Optical Aberrations on Visual Outcomes after the Implantation of a High-Addition Trifocal IOL.

Authors:  Guadalupe Cervantes-Coste; André Tapia; Claudia Corredor-Ortega; Mariana Osorio; Rafael Valdez; Martha Massaro; Cecilio Velasco-Barona; Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Far and Near Contrast Sensitivity and Quality of Vision with Six Presbyopia Correcting Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Miguel Á Gil; Consuelo Varón; Genis Cardona; José A Buil
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Simultaneous Presbyopia and Astigmatism Correction with a Novel Trifocal Toric Intraocular Lens-A One-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ladislav Viktor Nováček; Marie Němcová; Kristýna Sičová; Kateřina Tyx; Pavel Rozsíval; Jan Němčanský; Pavel Studený
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Spectacle Independence for Pseudophakic Patients - Experience with a Trifocal Supplementary Add-on Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona Gonzalez; Marta Romero Domínguez; Alfredo Castillo Gómez
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.