OBJECTIVE: Smoking topography variables and toxicant exposure (plasma nicotine and exhaled CO) were examined in 3 groups of study participants that smoked both cigarettes and either filtered little cigars (Winchester), cigarillos (Black & Mild), or large cigars (Phillies Blunt). METHODS: Laboratory ad lib smoking of the cigar products was collected with a smoking puff analyzer; plasma levels of nicotine and exhaled CO were collected before and after smoking. RESULTS: Although there were no statistically significant differences in demographic and cigarette smoking topography among the groups, there were significant differences in how the different cigar products were smoked. Plasma nicotine boost was similar after all products but exhaled CO was greater after the cigarillo and large cigar than the little cigar. Some of the differences were due to the differences in article size but other differences were apparent even after adjustment for the amount of tobacco burned or the mouth intake (puff volume). CONCLUSIONS: The topography findings of differences among products challenge the practice of grouping cigars as a single entity in surveys, regulatory decisions, and discussions of toxicant exposure. The results add to the discussion of distinctions among products in the scientific assessment of public health risk and regulatory decisions.
OBJECTIVE: Smoking topography variables and toxicant exposure (plasma nicotine and exhaled CO) were examined in 3 groups of study participants that smoked both cigarettes and either filtered little cigars (Winchester), cigarillos (Black & Mild), or large cigars (Phillies Blunt). METHODS: Laboratory ad lib smoking of the cigar products was collected with a smoking puff analyzer; plasma levels of nicotine and exhaled CO were collected before and after smoking. RESULTS: Although there were no statistically significant differences in demographic and cigarette smoking topography among the groups, there were significant differences in how the different cigar products were smoked. Plasma nicotine boost was similar after all products but exhaled CO was greater after the cigarillo and large cigar than the little cigar. Some of the differences were due to the differences in article size but other differences were apparent even after adjustment for the amount of tobacco burned or the mouth intake (puff volume). CONCLUSIONS: The topography findings of differences among products challenge the practice of grouping cigars as a single entity in surveys, regulatory decisions, and discussions of toxicant exposure. The results add to the discussion of distinctions among products in the scientific assessment of public health risk and regulatory decisions.
Entities:
Keywords:
cigarillos; large cigars; little cigars; smoking; tobacco; topography; toxicant exposure
Authors: Jennifer Cantrell; Jennifer M Kreslake; Ollie Ganz; Jennifer L Pearson; Donna Vallone; Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel; Haijun Xiao; Thomas R Kirchner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Bartosz Koszowski; Zachary R Rosenberry; Lauren C Viray; Jennifer L Potts; Wallace B Pickworth Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Israel T Agaku; Brian A King; Corinne G Husten; Rebecca Bunnell; Bridget K Ambrose; S Sean Hu; Enver Holder-Hayes; Hannah R Day Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Kathryn C Edwards; Eva Sharma; Michael J Halenar; Kristie A Taylor; Karin A Kasza; Hannah Day; Hoda T Hammad; Gabriella Anic; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jean Limpert; Lisa D Gardner; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland; Cassandra A Stanton Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Cindy M Chang; Brian L Rostron; Joanne T Chang; Catherine G Corey; Heather L Kimmel; Connie S Sosnoff; Maciej L Goniewicz; Kathryn C Edwards; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Yuesong Wang; Arseima Y Del Valle-Pinero; Maocheng Yang; Mark J Travers; Stephen Arnstein; Kristie Taylor; Kevin Conway; Bridget K Ambrose; Nicolette Borek; Andrew Hyland; Lanqing Wang; Benjamin C Blount; Dana M van Bemmel Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Victoria H Coleman-Cowger; Wallace B Pickworth; Robert A Lordo; Erica N Peters Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Amy M Cohn; Wallace Pickworth; Janet Audrain-McGovern; James Murphy; Andrea C Villanti; Donald Hedeker; Delaney Dunn; Riley Wyatt; Taylor Niznik; Whitney Cotten; Michael Smith; Sarah J Ehlke Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Reema Goel; Neil Trushin; Samantha M Reilly; Zachary Bitzer; Joshua Muscat; Jonathan Foulds; John P Richie Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Danielle M Smith; Richard J O'connor; Binnian Wei; Mark Travers; Andrew Hyland; Maciej L Goniewicz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 4.244