Literature DB >> 28966414

The Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire (CD-Quest): Validation in a Sample of Adults with Social Anxiety Disorder.

Simona C Kaplan1, Amanda S Morrison2, Philippe R Goldin3, Thomas M Olino1, Richard G Heimberg1, James J Gross2.   

Abstract

Cognitive distortions are thought to be central to the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders and are a widely acknowledged treatment target in cognitive-behavioral interventions. However, little research has focused on the measurement of cognitive distortions. The Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire (CD-Quest; de Oliveira, 2015), a brief, 15-item questionnaire, assesses the frequency and intensity of cognitive distortions. The CD-Quest has been shown to have sound psychometric properties in American, Australian, and Brazilian undergraduate samples and one Turkish-speaking outpatient clinical sample. The current study aimed to provide the first evaluation of the psychometric properties of the English version of the CD-Quest in a clinical sample and the first evaluation of any version of the CD-Quest in a sample of adults diagnosed with social anxiety disorder (SAD). In a sample of treatment-seeking adults with SAD, the CD-Quest demonstrated good convergent validity, discriminant validity, known-groups validity, and treatment sensitivity. It also showed good internal consistency, and both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses supported the previously reported unitary factor structure. Findings extend prior research indicating the reliability and validity of the CD-Quest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; cognitive distortion; cognitive error; cognitive model; social anxiety; social anxiety disorder

Year:  2017        PMID: 28966414      PMCID: PMC5617126          DOI: 10.1007/s10608-017-9838-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognit Ther Res        ISSN: 0147-5916


  37 in total

1.  More information from fewer questions: the factor structure and item properties of the original and brief fear of negative evaluation scale.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Carol M Woods; David M Thissen; Richard G Heimberg; Dianne L Chambless; Ronald M Rapee
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2004-06

2.  The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: Validity and factor structure in young people.

Authors:  Rocío de la Vega; Catarina Tomé-Pires; Ester Solé; Mélanie Racine; Elena Castarlenas; Mark P Jensen; Jordi Miró
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-12

3.  The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

Authors:  E Diener; R A Emmons; R J Larsen; S Griffin
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1985-02

4.  Implicit theories of emotion: affective and social outcomes across a major life transition.

Authors:  Maya Tamir; Oliver P John; Sanjay Srivastava; James J Gross
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-04

5.  Assessing psychiatric impairment in primary care with the Sheehan Disability Scale.

Authors:  A C Leon; M Olfson; L Portera; L Farber; D V Sheehan
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.210

6.  Social phobia.

Authors:  M R Liebowitz
Journal:  Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  1987

7.  Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control.

Authors:  Douglas Derryberry; Marjorie A Reed
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2002-05

8.  Development and validation of the Core Beliefs Questionnaire in a sample of individuals with social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Quincy J J Wong; Bree Gregory; Jonathan E Gaston; Ronald M Rapee; Judith K Wilson; Maree J Abbott
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Group CBT versus MBSR for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Philippe R Goldin; Amanda Morrison; Hooria Jazaieri; Faith Brozovich; Richard Heimberg; James J Gross
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-03-07

10.  The reverse of social anxiety is not always the opposite: the reverse-scored items of the social interaction anxiety scale do not belong.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Carol M Woods; Richard G Heimberg
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2007-02-21
View more
  2 in total

1.  Do sudden gains predict treatment outcome in social anxiety disorder? Findings from two randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Rachel M Butler; Emily B O'Day; Simona C Kaplan; Michaela B Swee; Arielle Horenstein; Amanda S Morrison; Philippe R Goldin; James J Gross; Richard G Heimberg
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2019-08-09

2.  Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire (CD-Quest) in College Students.

Authors:  Liju Qian; Li Liu; Min Chen; Shanmei Wang; Zhongchang Cao; Ning Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-11-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.