Literature DB >> 10940396

Effects of external trunk loads on lumbar spine stability.

J Cholewicki1, A P Simons, A Radebold.   

Abstract

Stability of the lumbar spine is an important factor in determining spinal response to sudden loading. Using two different methods, this study evaluated how various trunk load magnitudes and directions affect lumbar spine stability. The first method was a quick release procedure in which effective trunk stiffness and stability were calculated from trunk kinematic response to a resisted-force release. The second method combined trunk muscle EMG data with a biomechanical model to calculate lumbar spine stability. Twelve subjects were tested in trunk flexion, extension, and lateral bending under nine permutations of vertical and horizontal trunk loading. The vertical load values were set at 0, 20, and 40% of the subject's body weight (BW). The horizontal loads were 0, 10, and 20% of BW. Effective spine stability as obtained from quick release experimentation increased significantly (p<0.01) with increased vertical and horizontal loading. It ranged from 785 (S.D.=580) Nm/rad under no-load conditions to 2200 (S.D.=1015) Nm/rad when the maximum horizontal and vertical loads were applied to the trunk simultaneously. Stability of the lumbar spine achieved prior to force release and estimated from the biomechanical model explained approximately 50% of variance in the effective spine stability obtained from quick release trials in extension and lateral bending (0.53<R(2)<0.63). There was no such correlation in flexion trials. It was concluded that lumbar spine stability increased with increased trunk load magnitude to the extent that this load brought about an increase in trunk muscle activation. Indirectly, our data suggest that muscle reflex response to sudden loading can augment the lumbar spine stability level achieved immediately prior to the sudden loading event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10940396     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00118-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  41 in total

1.  External perturbation of the trunk in standing humans differentially activates components of the medial back muscles.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Paul W Hodges; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads--application of kinematics-based algorithm.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; M El-Rich; D G Pop; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Movement of the upper body and muscle activity patterns following a rapidly applied load: the influence of pre-load alterations.

Authors:  T Bull Andersen; M Essendrop; B Schibye
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Altered muscular activation during prone hip extension in women with and without low back pain.

Authors:  Amir M Arab; Leila Ghamkhar; Mahnaz Emami; Mohammad R Nourbakhsh
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2011-08-14

5.  The effect of sex and chronic low back pain on back muscle reflex responses.

Authors:  Christian Larivière; Robert Forget; Roger Vadeboncoeur; Martin Bilodeau; Hakim Mecheri
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Active trunk stiffness increases with co-contraction.

Authors:  Patrick J Lee; Ellen L Rogers; Kevin P Granata
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  Low-back biomechanics and static stability during isometric pushing.

Authors:  Kevin R Granata; Bradford C Bennett
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Contribution of sensorimotor integration to spinal stabilization in humans.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  The importance of sensory-motor control in providing core stability: implications for measurement and training.

Authors:  Jan Borghuis; At L Hof; Koen A P M Lemmink
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Comparison of trunk stiffness provided by different design characteristics of lumbosacral orthoses.

Authors:  Jacek Cholewicki; Angela S Lee; N Peter Reeves; David C Morrisette
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.