Andrew J Kompel1, Xinning Li2, Ali Guermazi1, Akira M Murakami3. 1. Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, FGH Building, 820 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA, 02118, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, 850 Harrison Avenue-Dowling 2 North, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, FGH Building, 820 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA, 02118, USA. Akira.Murakami@bmc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Injuries to the labrum, joint capsule (in particular the inferior glenohumeral ligament), cartilage, and glenoid periosteum are associated with anterior shoulder instability. The goal of this review is to provide common radiographic images and findings in patients with anterior shoulder instability. Furthermore, we will demonstrate the best methods for measuring anterior glenoid bone loss. RECENT FINDINGS: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is highly relied upon for evaluating anterior shoulder instability and can diagnose soft tissue injuries with high sensitivity. While 3D computed tomography (CT) scan has been considered the optimal tool for evaluating osseous defects, certain MR imaging sequences have been shown to have similar diagnostic accuracy. Repair of Bankart lesions is critical to stabilizing the shoulder, and in the recent years, there has been an increasing focus on imaging to accurately characterize and measure glenoid bone loss to properly indicate patients for either arthroscopic repair or anterior bony reconstruction. Furthermore, Hill-Sachs lesions are commonly seen with shoulder instability, and importance must be placed on measuring the size and depth of these lesions along with possible engagement, as these factors will dictate management. The labral-ligamentous complex and rotator cuff are primary stabilizers of the shoulder. With anterior shoulder instability, the labrum is frequently injured. MRI with an arthrogram or provocative maneuvers is the gold standard for diagnosis. Various imaging modalities and methods can be performed to identify and measure Bankart and Hill-Sachs lesions, which can then be used for surgical planning and treating shoulder instability.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Injuries to the labrum, joint capsule (in particular the inferior glenohumeral ligament), cartilage, and glenoid periosteum are associated with anterior shoulder instability. The goal of this review is to provide common radiographic images and findings in patients with anterior shoulder instability. Furthermore, we will demonstrate the best methods for measuring anterior glenoid bone loss. RECENT FINDINGS: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is highly relied upon for evaluating anterior shoulder instability and can diagnose soft tissue injuries with high sensitivity. While 3D computed tomography (CT) scan has been considered the optimal tool for evaluating osseous defects, certain MR imaging sequences have been shown to have similar diagnostic accuracy. Repair of Bankart lesions is critical to stabilizing the shoulder, and in the recent years, there has been an increasing focus on imaging to accurately characterize and measure glenoid bone loss to properly indicate patients for either arthroscopic repair or anterior bony reconstruction. Furthermore, Hill-Sachs lesions are commonly seen with shoulder instability, and importance must be placed on measuring the size and depth of these lesions along with possible engagement, as these factors will dictate management. The labral-ligamentous complex and rotator cuff are primary stabilizers of the shoulder. With anterior shoulder instability, the labrum is frequently injured. MRI with an arthrogram or provocative maneuvers is the gold standard for diagnosis. Various imaging modalities and methods can be performed to identify and measure Bankart and Hill-Sachs lesions, which can then be used for surgical planning and treating shoulder instability.
Authors: Patrick E Greis; Matthew G Scuderi; Alexander Mohr; Kent N Bachus; Robert T Burks Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2002 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Pol E Huijsmans; Pieter S Haen; Martin Kidd; Wouter J Dhert; Victor P M van der Hulst; W Jaap Willems Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Naveen Subhas; Alex Benedick; Nancy A Obuchowski; Joshua M Polster; Luis S Beltran; Jean Schils; Gina A Ciavarra; Soterios Gyftopoulos Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Madeleine A Salesky; Alan L Zhang; C Benjamin Ma; Brian T Feeley; Valentina Pedoia; Drew A Lansdown Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2022-02-13
Authors: Justin J Ernat; Dylan R Rakowski; Aaron J Casp; Simon Lee; Annalise M Peebles; Jared A Hanson; Matthew T Provencher; Peter J Millett Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-12-07
Authors: Akira M Murakami; Andrew J Kompel; Lars Engebretsen; Xinning Li; Bruce B Forster; Michel D Crema; Daichi Hayashi; Mohamed Jarraya; Frank W Roemer; Ali Guermazi Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Georg J Wengert; Marc Schmutzer; Hubert Bickel; Mircea-Constantin Sora; Stephan H Polanec; Micheal Weber; Claudia Schueller-Weidekamm Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 3.240