Literature DB >> 28964205

Improved scatter correction with factor analysis for planar and SPECT imaging.

Peter Knoll1, Arman Rahmim2, Selma Gültekin1, Martin Šámal3, Michael Ljungberg4, Siroos Mirzaei1, Paul Segars5, Boguslaw Szczupak6.   

Abstract

Quantitative nuclear medicine imaging is an increasingly important frontier. In order to achieve quantitative imaging, various interactions of photons with matter have to be modeled and compensated. Although correction for photon attenuation has been addressed by including x-ray CT scans (accurate), correction for Compton scatter remains an open issue. The inclusion of scattered photons within the energy window used for planar or SPECT data acquisition decreases the contrast of the image. While a number of methods for scatter correction have been proposed in the past, in this work, we propose and assess a novel, user-independent framework applying factor analysis (FA). Extensive Monte Carlo simulations for planar and tomographic imaging were performed using the SIMIND software. Furthermore, planar acquisition of two Petri dishes filled with 99mTc solutions and a Jaszczak phantom study (Data Spectrum Corporation, Durham, NC, USA) using a dual head gamma camera were performed. In order to use FA for scatter correction, we subdivided the applied energy window into a number of sub-windows, serving as input data. FA results in two factor images (photo-peak, scatter) and two corresponding factor curves (energy spectra). Planar and tomographic Jaszczak phantom gamma camera measurements were recorded. The tomographic data (simulations and measurements) were processed for each angular position resulting in a photo-peak and a scatter data set. The reconstructed transaxial slices of the Jaszczak phantom were quantified using an ImageJ plugin. The data obtained by FA showed good agreement with the energy spectra, photo-peak, and scatter images obtained in all Monte Carlo simulated data sets. For comparison, the standard dual-energy window (DEW) approach was additionally applied for scatter correction. FA in comparison with the DEW method results in significant improvements in image accuracy for both planar and tomographic data sets. FA can be used as a user-independent approach for scatter correction in nuclear medicine.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28964205      PMCID: PMC5848721          DOI: 10.1063/1.5001024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum        ISSN: 0034-6748            Impact factor:   1.523


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of 3D Monte Carlo-based scatter correction for 201Tl cardiac perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Jianbin Xiao; Tim C de Wit; Wojciech Zbijewski; Steven G Staelens; Freek J Beekman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Quantitative SPECT/CT: SPECT joins PET as a quantitative imaging modality.

Authors:  Dale L Bailey; Kathy P Willowson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Scatter correction in planar imaging and SPECT by constrained factor analysis of dynamic structures (FADS).

Authors:  J Mas; P Hannequin; R Ben Younes; B Bellaton; R Bidet
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Review and current status of SPECT scatter correction.

Authors:  Brian F Hutton; Irène Buvat; Freek J Beekman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Rotation to simple structure in factor analysis of dynamic radionuclide studies.

Authors:  M Sámal; M Kárný; H Sůrová; E Maríková; Z Dienstbier
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Comparative assessment of nine scatter correction methods based on spectral analysis using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  I Buvat; M Rodriguez-Villafuerte; A Todd-Pokropek; H Benali; R Di Paola
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Target apex-seeking in factor analysis of medical image sequences.

Authors:  I Buvat; H Benali; F Frouin; J P Bazin; R Di Paola
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy.

Authors:  I G Zubal; C R Harrell; E O Smith; Z Rattner; G Gindi; P B Hoffer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Improved SPECT quantification using compensation for scattered photons.

Authors:  R J Jaszczak; K L Greer; C E Floyd; C C Harris; R E Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Evaluation of six scatter correction methods based on spectral analysis in (99m)Tc SPECT imaging using SIMIND Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Mahsa Noori Asl; Alireza Sadremomtaz; Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Verification of phantom accuracy using a Monte Carlo simulation: bone scintigraphy chest phantom.

Authors:  Toshimune Ito; Hirotatsu Tsuchikame; Hajime Ichikawa; Masahisa Onoguchi; Koichi Okuda; Takayuki Shibutani; Noriyo Yokotsuka; Hiroshi Tomizawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2021-07-24

2.  Evaluation of quantitative accuracy among different scatter corrections for quantitative bone SPECT/CT imaging.

Authors:  Kenta Miwa; Reo Nemoto; Hirotsugu Masuko; Tensho Yamao; Rinya Kobayashi; Noriaki Miyaji; Kosuke Inoue; Hiroya Onodera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Assessment of Four Scatter Correction Methods in In-111 SPECT Imaging: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Mahsa Noori-Asl
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-20

4.  Variation of Contrast Values for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Hybrid Systems with Different Correction Methods.

Authors:  Hazem M Tantawy; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Nadia L Helal; Ibrahim E Saad
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-09-25

5.  Attenuation correction in single-photon emission computed tomography for NURBS-based cardiac-torso phantom using dual-energy acquisition.

Authors:  Hossein Rajabi; Hadi Taleshi Ahangari; Iraj Mohammadi; Alireza Mohammadkarim; Mohammad Ali Tajik-Mansoury
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-08-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.