Literature DB >> 28964164

Sensitivity of reentrant driver localization to electrophysiological parameter variability in image-based computational models of persistent atrial fibrillation sustained by a fibrotic substrate.

Dongdong Deng1, Michael J Murphy1, Joe B Hakim1, William H Franceschi1, Sohail Zahid1, Farhad Pashakhanloo1, Natalia A Trayanova1, Patrick M Boyle1.   

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, causing morbidity and mortality in millions worldwide. The atria of patients with persistent AF (PsAF) are characterized by the presence of extensive and distributed atrial fibrosis, which facilitates the formation of persistent reentrant drivers (RDs, i.e., spiral waves), which promote fibrillatory activity. Targeted catheter ablation of RD-harboring tissues has shown promise as a clinical treatment for PsAF, but the outcomes remain sub-par. Personalized computational modeling has been proposed as a means of non-invasively predicting optimal ablation targets in individual PsAF patients, but it remains unclear how RD localization dynamics are influenced by inter-patient variability in the spatial distribution of atrial fibrosis, action potential duration (APD), and conduction velocity (CV). Here, we conduct simulations in computational models of fibrotic atria derived from the clinical imaging of PsAF patients to characterize the sensitivity of RD locations to these three factors. We show that RDs consistently anchor to boundaries between fibrotic and non-fibrotic tissues, as delineated by late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, but those changes in APD/CV can enhance or attenuate the likelihood that an RD will anchor to a specific site. These findings show that the level of uncertainty present in patient-specific atrial models reconstructed without any invasive measurements (i.e., incorporating each individual's unique distribution of fibrotic tissue from medical imaging alongside an average representation of AF-remodeled electrophysiology) is sufficiently high that a personalized ablation strategy based on targeting simulation-predicted RD trajectories alone may not produce the desired result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28964164      PMCID: PMC5605332          DOI: 10.1063/1.5003340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chaos        ISSN: 1054-1500            Impact factor:   3.642


  43 in total

1.  Computational techniques for solving the bidomain equations in three dimensions.

Authors:  Edward J Vigmond; Felipe Aguel; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Computational tools for modeling electrical activity in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  Edward J Vigmond; Matt Hughes; G Plank; L Joshua Leon
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.438

3.  Stable microreentrant sources as a mechanism of atrial fibrillation in the isolated sheep heart.

Authors:  R Mandapati; A Skanes; J Chen; O Berenfeld; J Jalife
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Stanley Nattel; Brett Burstein; Dobromir Dobrev
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-04

5.  Effect of pulmonary vein isolation on the left-to-right atrial dominant frequency gradient in human atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sorin Lazar; Sanjay Dixit; David J Callans; David Lin; Francis E Marchlinski; Edward P Gerstenfeld
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort.

Authors:  D Li; S Fareh; T K Leung; S Nattel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Epicardial mapping of chronic atrial fibrillation in patients: preliminary observations.

Authors:  Jayakumar Sahadevan; Kyungmoo Ryu; Leora Peltz; Celeen M Khrestian; Robert W Stewart; Alan H Markowitz; Albert L Waldo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Effects of two different catheter ablation techniques on spectral characteristics of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Kristina Lemola; Michael Ting; Priya Gupta; Jeffrey N Anker; Aman Chugh; Eric Good; Scott Reich; David Tschopp; Petar Igic; Darryl Elmouchi; Krit Jongnarangsin; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady; Hakan Oral
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Structural remodeling in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Domenico Corradi; Sergio Callegari; Roberta Maestri; Stefano Benussi; Ottavio Alfieri
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-10-14

10.  Multiple mechanisms of spiral wave breakup in a model of cardiac electrical activity.

Authors:  Flavio H. Fenton; Elizabeth M. Cherry; Harold M. Hastings; Steven J. Evans
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.642

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Computational modeling: What does it tell us about atrial fibrillation therapy?

Authors:  Eleonora Grandi; Dobromir Dobrev; Jordi Heijman
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 2.  An audit of uncertainty in multi-scale cardiac electrophysiology models.

Authors:  Richard H Clayton; Yasser Aboelkassem; Chris D Cantwell; Cesare Corrado; Tammo Delhaas; Wouter Huberts; Chon Lok Lei; Haibo Ni; Alexander V Panfilov; Caroline Roney; Rodrigo Weber Dos Santos
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  The role of personalized atrial modeling in understanding atrial fibrillation mechanisms and improving treatment.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Aronis; Rheeda Ali; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Accurate Conduction Velocity Maps and Their Association With Scar Distribution on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Postinfarction Ventricular Tachycardias.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Aronis; Rheeda L Ali; Jonathan Chrispin; Natalia A Trayanova; Adityo Prakosa; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Ronald D Berger; Joe B Hakim; Jialiu Liang; Harikrishna Tandri; Fei Teng
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-03-19

5.  Preprocedure Application of Machine Learning and Mechanistic Simulations Predicts Likelihood of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Julie K Shade; Rheeda L Ali; Dante Basile; Dan Popescu; Tauseef Akhtar; Joseph E Marine; David D Spragg; Hugh Calkins; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-06-14

6.  Optimal contrast-enhanced MRI image thresholding for accurate prediction of ventricular tachycardia using ex-vivo high resolution models.

Authors:  Dongdong Deng; Plamen Nikolov; Hermenegild J Arevalo; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Is human atrial fibrillation stochastic or deterministic?-Insights from missing ordinal patterns and causal entropy-complexity plane analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Aronis; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Jonathan Chrispin; Joseph E Marine; David D Spragg; Susumu Tao; Harikrishna Tandri; Hiroshi Ashikaga
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.642

8.  Arrhythmogenic propensity of the fibrotic substrate after atrial fibrillation ablation: a longitudinal study using magnetic resonance imaging-based atrial models.

Authors:  Rheeda L Ali; Joe B Hakim; Patrick M Boyle; Sohail Zahid; Bhradeev Sivasambu; Joseph E Marine; Hugh Calkins; Natalia A Trayanova; David D Spragg
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 10.787

9.  Arrhythmia dynamics in computational models of the atria following virtual ablation of re-entrant drivers.

Authors:  Joe B Hakim; Michael J Murphy; Natalia A Trayanova; Patrick M Boyle
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Characterizing the arrhythmogenic substrate in personalized models of atrial fibrillation: sensitivity to mesh resolution and pacing protocol in AF models.

Authors:  Patrick M Boyle; Alexander R Ochs; Rheeda L Ali; Nikhil Paliwal; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.