Literature DB >> 29960392

Is human atrial fibrillation stochastic or deterministic?-Insights from missing ordinal patterns and causal entropy-complexity plane analysis.

Konstantinos N Aronis1, Ronald D Berger1, Hugh Calkins1, Jonathan Chrispin1, Joseph E Marine1, David D Spragg1, Susumu Tao1, Harikrishna Tandri1, Hiroshi Ashikaga1.   

Abstract

The mechanism of atrial fibrillation (AF) maintenance in humans is yet to be determined. It remains controversial whether cardiac fibrillatory dynamics are the result of a deterministic or a stochastic process. Traditional methods to differentiate deterministic from stochastic processes have several limitations and are not reliably applied to short and noisy data obtained during clinical studies. The appearance of missing ordinal patterns (MOPs) using the Bandt-Pompe (BP) symbolization is indicative of deterministic dynamics and is robust to brief time series and experimental noise. Our aim was to evaluate whether human AF dynamics is the result of a stochastic or a deterministic process. We used 38 intracardiac atrial electrograms during AF from the coronary sinus of 10 patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. We extracted the intervals between consecutive atrial depolarizations (AA interval) and converted the AA interval time series to their BP symbolic representation (embedding dimension 5, time delay 1). We generated 40 iterative amplitude-adjusted, Fourier-transform (IAAFT) surrogate data for each of the AA time series. IAAFT surrogates have the same frequency spectrum, autocorrelation, and probability distribution with the original time series. Using the BP symbolization, we compared the number of MOPs and the rate of MOP decay in the first 1000 timepoints of the original time series with that of the surrogate data. We calculated permutation entropy and permutation statistical complexity and represented each time series on the causal entropy-complexity plane. We demonstrated that (a) the number of MOPs in human AF is significantly higher compared to the surrogate data (2.7 ± 1.18 vs. 0.39 ± 0.28, p < 0.001); (b) the median rate of MOP decay in human AF was significantly lower compared with the surrogate data (6.58 × 10-3 vs. 7.79 × 10-3, p < 0.001); and (c) 81.6% of the individual recordings had a rate of decay lower than the 95% confidence intervals of their corresponding surrogates. On the causal entropy-complexity plane, human AF lay on the deterministic part of the plane that was located above the trajectory of fractional Brownian motion with different Hurst exponents on the plane. This analysis demonstrates that human AF dynamics does not arise from a rescaled linear stochastic process or a fractional noise, but either a deterministic or a nonlinear stochastic process. Our results justify the development and application of mathematical analysis and modeling tools to enable predictive control of human AF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29960392      PMCID: PMC6026026          DOI: 10.1063/1.5023588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chaos        ISSN: 1054-1500            Impact factor:   3.642


  35 in total

1.  Reliability of the 0-1 test for chaos.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Wen-wen Tung; Jianbo Gao; Yinhe Cao
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2005-11-14

2.  Failure in distinguishing colored noise from chaos using the "noise titration" technique.

Authors:  Ubiratan S Freitas; Christophe Letellier; Luis A Aguirre
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2009-03-03

3.  Using missing ordinal patterns to detect nonlinearity in time series data.

Authors:  Christopher W Kulp; Luciano Zunino; Thomas Osborne; Brianna Zawadzki
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.529

4.  Human atrial action potential and Ca2+ model: sinus rhythm and chronic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Eleonora Grandi; Sandeep V Pandit; Niels Voigt; Antony J Workman; Dobromir Dobrev; José Jalife; Donald M Bers
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Quasiperiodicity and chaos in cardiac fibrillation.

Authors:  A Garfinkel; P S Chen; D O Walter; H S Karagueuzian; B Kogan; S J Evans; M Karpoukhin; C Hwang; T Uchida; M Gotoh; O Nwasokwa; P Sager; J N Weiss
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Multielectrode basket catheter mapping for human atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  H F Pitschner; A Berkovic; S Grumbrecht; J Neuzner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-08

7.  Deterministic dynamics of neural activity during absence seizures in rats.

Authors:  Gaoxiang Ouyang; Xiaoli Li; Chuangyin Dang; Douglas A Richards
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2009-04-29

8.  Nonlinear analysis of epicardial atrial electrograms of electrically induced atrial fibrillation in man.

Authors:  B P Hoekstra; C G Diks; M A Allessie; J DeGoede
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1995-06

9.  Impact of sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release on calcium dynamics and action potential morphology in human atrial myocytes: a computational study.

Authors:  Jussi T Koivumäki; Topi Korhonen; Pasi Tavi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A Stochastic Individual-Based Model of the Progression of Atrial Fibrillation in Individuals and Populations.

Authors:  Eugene T Y Chang; Yen Ting Lin; Tobias Galla; Richard H Clayton; Julie Eatock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Visualizing and Quantifying Irregular Heart Rate Irregularities to Identify Atrial Fibrillation Events.

Authors:  Noam Keidar; Yonatan Elul; Assaf Schuster; Yael Yaniv
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  A Novel Tool for the Identification and Characterization of Repetitive Patterns in High-Density Contact Mapping of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Stef Zeemering; Arne van Hunnik; Frank van Rosmalen; Pietro Bonizzi; Billy Scaf; Tammo Delhaas; Sander Verheule; Ulrich Schotten
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.566

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.