Literature DB >> 28963301

Association between vomiting in the first trimester and preterm birth: a retrospective birth cohort study in Wuhan, China.

Ronghua Hu1, Yawen Chen1, Yiming Zhang1, Zhengmin Qian2, Yan Liu1, Michael G Vaughn2, Shunqing Xu3, Tongzhang Zheng4, Mingzhu Liu1, Bin Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although vomiting in the first trimester has been reported to be associated with preterm birth (PTB), findings supporting this association remain inconsistent. Our aim was to assess the association between vomiting and PTB, as well as evaluate if the association is modified by pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI).
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Wuhan, a central city of China. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 317 463 pregnant women who had a live, singleton newborn from 1 January 2010 to 23 May 2016 were enrolled in our study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: PTB was defined as gestational age <37 gestational weeks. Gestational age was calculated using reports from mothers based on the first day of their last menstrual period. An ultrasound was routinely used to determine gestational age before 12 gestational weeks.
RESULTS: Of the 317 463 pregnant women, 29.88% (94 857) experienced vomiting in the first trimester and 5.00% (15 889) experienced a PTB. Vomiting in the first trimester increased the risk for PTB and the multivariable adjusted OR was 1.05 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.09). In the stratified analyses, the association of vomiting in the first trimester was significant among underweight women (adjusted OR=1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.17) and normal pre-pregnancy BMI women (adjusted OR=1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11), but not in overweight women (adjusted OR=1.01, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.14) and obese women (adjusted OR=0.93, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.19).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that vomiting in the first trimester was associated with PTB. Additionally, women with underweight and normal pre-pregnancy BMI who experienced vomiting are more likely to have a PTB. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pre-pregnancy body mass index; preterm birth; vomiting

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28963301      PMCID: PMC5623485          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


The present study is a cohort study, which enrolled a large population of 317 463 pregnant women. This is the first study exploring the relationship between vomiting in the first trimester and preterm birth (PTB) in Chinese women by pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) status. Vomiting symptoms were based on self-reported data, which may be a possible source of bias. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was relatively low in our sample, and the relationship between vomiting and PTB in women with a high pre-pregnancy BMI needs to be further assessed.

Introduction

Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) is a collection of symptoms composed of nausea alone or nausea in combination with vomiting.1 This condition typically starts prior to 9 weeks of gestation and subsides by the end of the first trimester; however, this condition has been shown to continue into the second trimester in up to 25% of pregnant women and for 0.3%–2.3% into the third trimester.2 NVP has an important effect on both individuals and society as it causes emotional distress, depression and can have a negative effect on a woman’s activities and relationships.3 4 NVP also has been found to lead to loss of time at work and a decrease in job productivity.5 The aetiology of NVP remains unknown, although it is currently believed to be related to early pregnancy hormones.6 Almost 70% of women worldwide experience NVP.7 The average rate of vomiting only in early pregnancy is 47.1%, and the reported rates generally range from 22.3% to 63.5%.8 A Norwegian cohort investigation reported that the rate of NVP was 33% among 51 675 women.9 Källén et al studied the occurrence of NVP via questionnaires in 3675 Swedish pregnant women and observed that 38.3% of pregnant women reported vomiting in early pregnancy.10 One previous meta-analysis, which included 23 studies comprising 67 602 women,11 estimated the rate of NVP in the USA to be as high as 68.6%. Meanwhile, studies on the rate of NVP in China are few and are limited by their small sample sizes. Chin12 conducted a study in a district hospital in Hong Kong in 1989 and found that the incidence of NVP was 74.9% among 1453 patients. Another cross-sectional study conducted in a university obstetric unit in Hong Kong revealed that the prevalence of NVP was 90.9% among 396 women.13 In previous studies, NVP was not found to be associated with primary maternal diseases such as gastrointestinal infections or allergies.8 Recently, there was a resurgence of interest in topics related to NVP, such as death,14 pregnancy complications15 and birth outcomes.16 Some studies reported that women with NVP were more likely to have a preterm birth (PTB) compared with symptom-free women.15 17 18 Still, other studies have found no association between this phenomenon.6 19 However, Czeizel and Puhó have suggested that women with NVP had a lower risk of PTB.20 A Norway prospective cohort study involving 51 675 pregnant women found nausea to decrease the risk for PTB by 14% but did not find NVP associated with PTB.9 To our knowledge, there has been only one case–control study, which was conducted in Chinese pregnant women, that addressed the relationship between PTB and a severe form of NVP called hyperemesis gravidarum.19 Information about the association between vomiting in the first trimester and risk of PTB in China is unclear. Furthermore, there has not been a study in which the population was grouped according to pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) to determine its contribution to the identification of the association between NVP and risk of PTB. Thus, our objective in the present study is to explore the association between vomiting in the first trimester and PTB as well as assess whether pre-pregnancy BMI modifies this association using a birth cohort study in Wuhan, China.

Materials and methods

Study population

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in Wuhan China, using data from the Wuhan Maternal and Child Health Management Information System (WMCHMIS). The WMCHMIS was introduced in our previous study.21 Enrolled women included every pregnant woman who had a live, singleton newborn from 1 January 2010 to 23 May 2016. The study has been approved by the Wuhan Children’s Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital). A total of 416 258 women were initially enrolled. We then excluded records with missing data on vomiting (n=95 886), offspring sex (n=22), maternal education (n=1852), parity (n=972) and gravidity (n=48). Moreover, we also excluded those with a maternal age less than 15 (n=8) and more than 50 (n=7). The final study population consisted of 317 463 pregnancies or 76.27% of the initial population.

Variables

Vomiting in the first trimester was assessed when pregnant women first visited the women and children healthcare centres. Maternal age, education, parity, gravidity, pre-pregnancy weight and height were self-reported at their first antenatal care visit, whereas offspring sex and other obstetric information were provided by midwives documented in WMCHMIS. Information was audited by clinicians and obstetric nurses, and a warning would be activated when illogical data were input into WMCHMIS. Vomiting was dichotomised into yes and no response formats. Maternal age was categorised into three groups: younger than 25, 25–34 years and 35 years and older. A proxy for socioeconomic status was the maternal education which was categorised into three groups: less than high school, high school and college. By parity, women were dichotomised into nullipara and multipara. Regarding gravidity, it was divided into less than three times and three times and more. Pre-pregnancy BMI was calculated as weight/height2 and grouped into four categories according to Chinese standard of weight for adults.22 The main outcome variable was PTB. PTB was defined as gestational age <37 gestational weeks.23 Gestational age was calculated using reports from mothers based on the first day of their last menstrual period. An ultrasound was routinely used to determine gestational age before 12 gestational weeks.

Statistical analysis

Results were presented as frequencies (%). Difference between PTB group and full-term group was assessed by Χ2 tests. A logistic regression model was used to estimate the association between vomiting in the first trimester and PTB. Results were adjusted for confounders including maternal age, education, parity, gravidity, pre-pregnancy BMI and offspring sex in accordance with previous studies.9 24 We also employed a stratified analysis by pre-pregnancy BMI, and the confounders adjusted in stratified analysis were maternal age, education, parity, gravidity and offspring sex. Crude and adjusted ORs statistics, as well as a 95% CI, were calculated. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS V.9.2 (SAS Statistical Institute).

Results

In 317 463 pregnancies included in our study (figure 1), gestational age ranged from 28 weeks to 43 weeks. Altogether, 94 857 out of 317 463 pregnant women (29.88%) reported vomiting in the first trimester. Further, 5.00% (15 889) of the births were delivered preterm. Maternal demographics and characteristics are shown in table 1. Women who were older than 35 years, had a college education, were multipara, had more than three times gravidity or had a higher pre-pregnancy BMI were more likely to have a PTB. PTB was observed to be more common in female babies than in male offspring.
Figure 1

Flow chart of population selection.

Table 1

Characteristics of women and infants

Preterm (n=15 889, 5.00%)Full-term (n=301 574, 95.00%)p Value
n%n%
Age at delivery
 <2530913.6282 22496.38<0.001
 25–3411 0555.17202 69294.83
 ≥3517439.4716 65890.53
Education level
 Less than high school35194.5573 73795.45<0.001
 High school50104.71101 45895.29
 College73605.50126 37994.50
Offspring sex
 Male91885.41160 67194.59<0.001
 Female67014.54140 90395.46
Parity
 Nullipara11 9484.65245 12195.35<0.001
 Multipara39416.5356 45393.47
Gravidity
 <311 4714.59238 25995.41<0.001
 ≥344186.5263 31593.48
Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2)
 Underweight (<18.5)31184.2170 91695.79<0.001
 Normal (18.5–23.9)11 0835.03209 24694.97
 Overweight (24–27.9)13606.9418 22693.06
 Obese (≥28)3289.33318690.67
Vomiting
 Yes49785.2589 87994.75<0.001
 No10 9114.90211 69595.10

BMI, body mass index.

Flow chart of population selection. Characteristics of women and infants BMI, body mass index. When vomiting women were compared with non-vomiting women, we found that vomiting in the first trimester produced a significant increase in risk for PTB, with OR=1.08 and 95% CI 1.04 to 1.13. The relationship still persisted (OR=1.05, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09, table 2) after adjustment for aforementioned confounders. In the additional stratified analyses, the results showed that vomiting in the first trimester was associated with PTB in underweight women (OR=1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.17) and in women with a normal pre-pregnancy BMI (OR=1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.11), but not among overweight and obese groups. After adjusting for the same set of confounders, no changes occurred in the results (table 2).
Table 2

Association between vomiting and PTB and its association stratified by pre-pregnancy BMI

Preterm, n (%)Full-term, n (%)Unadjusted OR (95% CI)p ValueAdjusted OR (95% CI)*p Value
Vomiting
 Yes4978 (5.25)89 879 (94.75)1.08 (1.04 to 1.11)<0.0011.05 (1.02 to 1.09)0.0048*
 No10 911 (4.90)211 695 (95.10)1.001.00
Underweight
Vomiting
 Yes810 (4.49)17 216 (95.56)1.08 (1.05 to 1.17)0.00421.08 (1.04 to 1.17)0.0082†
 No2308 (4.12)53 700 (95.86)1.001.00
Normal
Vomiting
 Yes3610 (5.22)65 485 (94.78)1.06 (1.04 to 1.11)0.00481.06 (1.02 to 1.01)0.0058†
 No7473 (4.94)143 761 (95.06)1.001.00
Overweight
Vomiting
 Yes462 (7.04)6099 (92.96)1.02 (0.91 to 1.15)0.70121.01 (0.90 to 1.14)0.8547†
 No898 (6.89)12 127 (93.11)1.001.00
Obese
Vomiting
 Yes106 (8.95)1079 (91.05)0.93 (0.73 to 1.19)0.57190.93 (0.73 to 1.19)0.5508†
 No222 (9.53)2107 (90.47)1.001.00

*Adjusted for maternal age, education, parity, gravidity, pre-pregnancy BMI and offspring sex.

†Adjusted for maternal age, education, parity, gravidity and offspring sex.

Association between vomiting and PTB and its association stratified by pre-pregnancy BMI *Adjusted for maternal age, education, parity, gravidity, pre-pregnancy BMI and offspring sex. †Adjusted for maternal age, education, parity, gravidity and offspring sex. Additionally, we assessed the associations of maternal age, education, parity, gravidity, pre-pregnancy BMI and offspring sex with risk of PTB. PTB was associated with all of the evaluated exposures (online supplementary table S1).

Discussion

NVP while pregnant has far reaching effects on the mental and physical health of mothers and their offspring. Little research has accrued on the association between NVP and PTB in China, especially taking into account pre-pregnancy BMI. This study showed that nearly 30% of Chinese pregnant women had experienced vomiting in the first trimester. The rate of vomiting in Chinese women was somewhat different than in other studies.9 11 25–27 A Norwegian cohort study reported that the rate of NVP was 33% among 51 675 women with 15 gestational weeks,9 which was higher than our findings. A previous meta-analysis estimated that the rate of NVP in the USA was 68.6% including 23 studies composed of 67 602 women.11 Conflicting results can likely be explained by heterogeneity of populations, methods, definitions and confounders. Our results showed that sociodemographic factors, such as age, education level, parity and gravidity, might influence PTB. Previous studies have indicated that women with advanced maternal age were associated with increased risk of PTB.28 29 Araya et al reported that age >35 years, delivery of more than two fetuses and <8 years of education were risk factors for PTB.29 Women aged >35 years had longer exposure times to chronic pathologies and unhealthy lifestyles30 and higher prevalence of maternal obesity in older mothers, which were associated with risk factors for PTB.31 Several studies demonstrated that the lower the socioeconomic and education level, the higher the probability of developing infection, and that was clearly associated with PTB before 30 weeks of gestation.32 33 In this large cohort study conducted among Chinese women, we have found an association between vomiting in the first trimester and PTB before 37 weeks of gestation. When compared with non-vomiting pregnant women, women who experienced vomiting were at an increased risk of PTB. Our results were inconsistent with that of other studies.15 18 34 35 For example, Czeizel and Puhó indicated that there was a significant association of vomiting with a decreased risk of PTB,20 and Naumann et al found that vomiting was not associated with PTB.27 The differences found among these studies may be attributed to race, definition or classification of vomiting and the differential sample sizes of the populations mentioned above. The possible causal link between vomiting and PTB remains elusive. The most common hypothesis proffered to explain the harmful effects of vomiting is based on the fact that vomiting leads to abnormal digestive function, which results in a lower nutrient intake of pregnant women.14 36 Vomiting may also affect maternal and fetal physiology through dehydration and the modulation of stress-related risk factors.37 38 Moreover, vomiting may cause low maternal weight gain during pregnancy, which has been associated with PTB as reported by Canadian research.6 Additionally, our results reveal that vomiting was a risk factor for PTB in women with underweight and normal pre-pregnancy BMI, but not in overweight and obese women. Previous studies have estimated the risk factors for vomiting and PTB separately and found different effects of pre-pregnancy BMI on vomiting and PTB.39–41 No study has assessed the association between vomiting and PTB by pre-pregnancy BMI. The biological mechanisms underlying the associations with maternal pre-pregnancy BMIs remain unclear. Shaw et al indicated that the relationship between pre-pregnancy BMI and risk of PTB was complex.23 Although it was not statistically significant, a trend towards lower risk for PTB in obese women with vomiting was observed. We speculate that vomiting may have relatively few impacts on the nutrition of obese women due to their increased capacity for energy storage. Strengths of this study are as follows. First, this is the first study exploring the relationship between vomiting in the first trimester and PTB in Chinese women while assessing the association between PTB and vomiting by pre-pregnancy BMI status. Second, the data were collected from the large population-based cohort and linked to the WMCHMIS, providing thorough and detailed access to pregnancy and birth outcomes. Third, with such a large cohort size, many significant associations tend to appear, and the merit of these in the clinical setting is notable. However, there are two limitations. One is the reliance on self-reported data on vomiting. Retrospective evaluation of vomiting symptoms has been reported as a possible source of bias.42 The other is that the prevalence of overweight and obesity was relatively low in our sample (6.17% and 1.10%, respectively), and the relationship between vomiting and PTB in women with a high pre-pregnancy BMI needs to be further assessed.

Conclusion

This study showed that vomiting presented an increased risk for PTB based on a large cohort study in China, although the effect was small. Vomiting was a risk for PTB in women who were underweight and normal weight based on their pre-pregnancy BMI. Although no significant association between vomiting and PTB in overweight and obese women was observed, clinicians should give all women suitable guidance for dealing with vomiting to ensure improved pregnancy outcomes. Finally, we recognise the need for greater clarity with respect to the association between vomiting and PTB and encourage researchers to build on our findings.
  41 in total

Review 1.  Nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy: its role in placental development.

Authors:  R R Huxley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Hyperemesis gravidarum and fetal outcome.

Authors:  James D Paauw; Sandra Bierling; Curtis R Cook; Alan T Davis
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Nausea and vomiting in health-related quality of life among Chinese pregnant women.

Authors:  Oi Ka Chan; Daljit S Sahota; Tak Yeung Leung; Lin Wai Chan; Tak Yuen Fung; Tze Kin Lau
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.100

4.  Outcomes of pregnancies complicated by hyperemesis gravidarum.

Authors:  Linda Dodds; Deshayne B Fell; K S Joseph; Victoria M Allen; Blair Butler
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Quantifying the global rates of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a meta analysis.

Authors:  Thomas R Einarson; Charles Piwko; Gideon Koren
Journal:  J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-13

Review 6.  The protective effects of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy against adverse fetal outcome--a systematic review.

Authors:  Gideon Koren; Svetlana Madjunkova; Caroline Maltepe
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.143

7.  Some new aspects on emesis gravidarum. Relations to clinical data, serum electrolytes, total protein and creatinine.

Authors:  A Järnfelt-Samsioe; B Eriksson; J Waldenström; G Samsioe
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 8.  Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy.

Authors:  Kenneth L Koch; Christine L Frissora
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.806

9.  Pregnancy complications and birth outcomes among women experiencing nausea only or nausea and vomiting during pregnancy in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study.

Authors:  Arthur Chortatos; Margaretha Haugen; Per Ole Iversen; Åse Vikanes; Malin Eberhard-Gran; Elisabeth Krefting Bjelland; Per Magnus; Marit B Veierød
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Norwegian PUQE (Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis and nausea) identifies patients with hyperemesis gravidarum and poor nutritional intake: a prospective cohort validation study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Birkeland; Guro Stokke; Randi J Tangvik; Erik A Torkildsen; Jane Boateng; Anne L Wollen; Susanne Albrechtsen; Hans Flaatten; Jone Trovik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Severity of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and early childhood neurobehavioural outcomes: The Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes study.

Authors:  Nicholas L Syn; Shiao-Yng Chan; Elisha Wan Ying Chia; Wei Xin Ong; Desiree Phua; Shirong Cai; Lynette P C Shek; Yap-Seng Chong; Lourdes Mary Daniel; Birit F P Broekman; Keith M Godfrey; Michael J Meaney; Evelyn C Law
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Incidence and trend of preterm birth in China, 1990-2016: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shiwen Jing; Chang Chen; Yuexin Gan; Joshua Vogel; Jun Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Nausea, vomiting and poor appetite during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes in rural Nepal: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Amanda Regodón Wallin; James M Tielsch; Subarna K Khatry; Luke C Mullany; Janet A Englund; Helen Chu; Steven C LeClerq; Joanne Katz
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Association between maternal outdoor physical exercise and the risk of preterm birth: a case-control study in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Miao Cai; Bin Zhang; Rong Yang; Tongzhang Zheng; Guanghui Dong; Hualiang Lin; Steven E Rigdon; Hong Xian; Leslie Hinyard; Pamela K Xaverius; Echu Liu; Thomas E Burroughs; Daire R Jansson; Morgan H LeBaige; Shaoping Yang; Zhengmin Qian
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Preterm delivery rate in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qinfeng Song; Junxi Chen; Yubo Zhou; Zhiwen Li; Hongtian Li; Jianmeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.105

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.