OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes among women with hyperemesis during pregnancy. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted among women with singleton deliveries between 1988 and 2002. Hyperemetic pregnancies were defined as those requiring one or more antepartum admissions for hyperemesis before 24 weeks of gestation. Severity of hyperemesis was evaluated according to the number of antenatal hospital admissions (1 or 2 versus 3 or more) and according to weight gain during pregnancy (< 7 kg [15.4 lb] versus > or = 7 kg). Maternal outcomes evaluated included weight gain during pregnancy, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, labor induction, and cesarean delivery. Neonatal outcomes included 5-minute Apgar score of less than 7, low birth weight, small for gestational age, preterm delivery, and perinatal death. Logistic regression was used to generate adjusted odds ratios for all outcomes, and the odds ratios were converted to relative risks. RESULTS: Of the 156,091 singleton pregnancies, 1,270 had an admission for hyperemesis. Compared to women without hyperemesis, infants born to women with hyperemesis and with low pregnancy weight gain (< 7 kg [15.4 lb]) were more likely to be low birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA), born before 37 weeks of gestation, and have a 5-minute Apgar score of less than 7. Compared with infants born to women without hyperemesis, rates of low birth weight and preterm delivery were substantially higher among infants born to women with hyperemesis and low pregnancy weight gain (4.2% versus 12.5% and 4.9% versus 13.9%, respectively). The outcomes among infants born to women with hyperemesis with pregnancy weight gain of 7 kg (15.4 lb) or more were not different from the outcomes among women without hyperemesis. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the adverse infant outcomes associated with hyperemesis are a consequence of, and mostly limited to, women with poor maternal weight gain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes among women with hyperemesis during pregnancy. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted among women with singleton deliveries between 1988 and 2002. Hyperemetic pregnancies were defined as those requiring one or more antepartum admissions for hyperemesis before 24 weeks of gestation. Severity of hyperemesis was evaluated according to the number of antenatal hospital admissions (1 or 2 versus 3 or more) and according to weight gain during pregnancy (< 7 kg [15.4 lb] versus > or = 7 kg). Maternal outcomes evaluated included weight gain during pregnancy, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, labor induction, and cesarean delivery. Neonatal outcomes included 5-minute Apgar score of less than 7, low birth weight, small for gestational age, preterm delivery, and perinatal death. Logistic regression was used to generate adjusted odds ratios for all outcomes, and the odds ratios were converted to relative risks. RESULTS: Of the 156,091 singleton pregnancies, 1,270 had an admission for hyperemesis. Compared to women without hyperemesis, infants born to women with hyperemesis and with low pregnancy weight gain (< 7 kg [15.4 lb]) were more likely to be low birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA), born before 37 weeks of gestation, and have a 5-minute Apgar score of less than 7. Compared with infants born to women without hyperemesis, rates of low birth weight and preterm delivery were substantially higher among infants born to women with hyperemesis and low pregnancy weight gain (4.2% versus 12.5% and 4.9% versus 13.9%, respectively). The outcomes among infants born to women with hyperemesis with pregnancy weight gain of 7 kg (15.4 lb) or more were not different from the outcomes among women without hyperemesis. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the adverse infant outcomes associated with hyperemesis are a consequence of, and mostly limited to, women with poor maternal weight gain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
Authors: Joan Christodoulou-Smith; Jeffrey I Gold; Roberto Romero; Thomas M Goodwin; Kimber W Macgibbon; Patrick M Mullin; Marlena S Fejzo Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2011-06-03
Authors: Yafeng Zhang; Rita M Cantor; Kimber MacGibbon; Roberto Romero; Thomas M Goodwin; Patrick M Mullin; Marlena S Fejzo Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Marlena S Fejzo; Chunyu Ching; Frederic P Schoenberg; Kimber Macgibbon; Roberto Romero; T Murphy Goodwin; Patrick M Mullin Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2011-11-24
Authors: Khulood T Ahmed; Ashraf A Almashhrawi; Rubayat N Rahman; Ghassan M Hammoud; Jamal A Ibdah Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 5.742