Literature DB >> 28962496

Complications after pectus excavatum repair using pectus bars in adolescents and adults: risk comparisons between age and technique groups.

Soohwan Choi1, Hyung Joo Park1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the complications associated with age and technique groups in patients undergoing pectus excavatum (PE) repair.
METHODS: The data of 994 patients who underwent PE repair from March 2011 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Mean age was 9.59 years (range 31 months-55 years), and 756 patients were men (76.1%). The age groups were defined as follows: Group 1, <5 years; Group 2, 5-9 years; Group 3, 10-14 years; Group 4, 15-17 years; Group 5, 18-19 years; Group 6, 20-24 years; and Group 7, >24 years. The technique groups were defined as follows: Group 1, patients who underwent repair with claw fixators and hinge plates; Group 2, patients who underwent repair with our 'bridge' technique. Complications were compared between age groups and technique groups.
RESULTS: No cases of mortality occurred. Complication rates in the age groups 1-7 were 5.4%, 3.6%, 12.1%, 18.2%, 17.3%, 13.9% and 16.7%, respectively. The complication rate tripled after the age of 10. In multivariable analysis, odds ratio of Groups 4, 5 and 7 and asymmetric types were 3.04, 2.81, 2.97 and 1.70 (P < 0.01, P = 0.02, 0.03 and 0.03, respectively). The bar dislocation rate in technique Group 1 was 0.8% (6 of 780). No bar dislocations occurred in technique Group 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Older patients have more asymmetric pectus deformity and they are also risk factors for complications following PE repair. The bridge technique provides a bar dislocation rate of 0%, even in adult patients. This procedure seems to reduce or prevent major complications following PE repair.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age groups; Bar dislocation; Complication; Pectus excavatum; Technical group

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28962496     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivx162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  5 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthesia for the surgical correction of chest wall deformities.

Authors:  T Ghafoor; M Edsell; I Hunt
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  "When to Nuss? patient age as a risk factor for complications of minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: a systematic review and meta-analysis".

Authors:  Arielle C Coughlin; Sofia Ahsanuddin; Dani Inglesby; Conner Fox; Hope Xu; Ilana Margulies; Farah Sayegh; Celine Soudant; Henry S Sacks; Andrew Kaufman; Peter J Taub
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Incidence and severity of surgical complications after pectus excavatum bar removal.

Authors:  Ara Shwan Media; Thomas Decker Christensen; Niels Katballe; Hans Kristian Pilegaard; Frank Vincenzo de Paoli
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

4.  Is Pectus Excavatum a Risk Factor for Spontaneous Pneumothorax? "Haller Index Measurements in Patients with Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax".

Authors:  Ali Kılıçgün; Osman Yakşi; Mehmet Ünal
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Elastic stable chest repair and its hybrid variants in 86 patients with pectus excavatum.

Authors:  Stefan Schulz-Drost; Anna Maria Luber; Kirsten Simon; Melanie Schulz-Drost; Julia Syed; Roman T Carbon; Manuel Besendörfer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.