| Literature DB >> 28962481 |
Tomoko Fujitani1, Akiko Inomata1, Akio Ogata1, Yoshimitsu Sakamoto1, Akihiko Hirose2, Tetsuji Nishimura3, Reiko Ikeda4, Dai Nakae1.
Abstract
The fetal toxicities of multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with various sizes were compared in CD1(ICR) mice. MWCNTs were suspended in 2% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose solution in phosphate-buffered saline. On day 9 of gestation, dams were administered a single intraperitoneal dose of MWCNTs (4 mg/kg body weight), while dams in the control group were administered vehicle (10 mL/kg body weight). The rectal temperatures of the dams were monitored 2 h after administaration to asses statuses of the dams. The dams and fetuses were examined on day 18 of gestation. The number of live fetus per dam decreased in some MWCNTs-administered groups. The mean percentages of live fetuses in total implantations in the MWCNTs-administered groups markedly varied from 0% to 95%, and the highest mean percentage of live fetuses in the MWCNTs-administered group was equivalent to that of the control group. The decrease in live fetuses depended on an increased number of early dead fetuses. In the groups with markedly lowered rectal temperature after administration, the fetal loss were evident. The blood levels of interleukin-6 and/or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in dam 2 h after administration of MWCNTs markedlyr increased, especially in the goups with significant decrease in live fetuses. These results indicated a relationship between inflammation in the dam, which probabely depended on the particular length of the MWCNTs, and the fetal toxicioty of MWCNTs in mice.Entities:
Keywords: Fetal toxicity; IL-6, interleukin-6; Interleukin-6; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; MWCNTs, multi-wall carbon nanotubes; Mice; Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; Multi-wall carbon nanotubes
Year: 2015 PMID: 28962481 PMCID: PMC5598535 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.07.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
The size, purity and Fe content of the multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) utilized in the present study.
| MWCNTs | Length (μm) | Diameter (nm) | Purity (%) | Fe content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WS | 0.5–2 | 40–70 | – | 0.046 |
| N | 1–4 ; 50.9% | 50–80 ; 94.8% | >98 | 0.046 |
| 5–20 ; 27.5% | ||||
| Mean 3.5 | ||||
| M | 1–4 ; 38.6% | 50–80 ; 97.2% | >95 | 0.35 |
| 5–20 ; 58.3% | ||||
| 20- ; 3.1% | ||||
| Mean 3.3 | ||||
| WL | 0.5–10 | 85-200 | – | 6.504 |
| SD-1 | Mean 6 | Mean 150 | >99.95 | <0.005 |
| T | several 10 | 20–100 | 85–94 | 3.822 |
| to several 100 |
The effects of intraperitoneal dose of various MWCNTs on the dams.
| Control | MWCNTs administered (4mg/kg b.w.) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (CMCNa) | WS | N | M | WL | SD-1 | T | |
| Female mated | 11 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 11 |
| Female died | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Female gestated | 11 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Rectal temperature | |||||||
| Before the administration | 38.4 ± 0.3 | 38.6 ± 0.2 | 38.2 ± 0.2 | 38.1 ± 0.3 | 38.5 ± 0.3 | 38.4 ± 0.4 | 38.5 ± 0.3 |
| 2 h after administration | 37.4 ± 0.5 | 36.8 ± 0.7 | 33.3 ± 0.9** | 33.1 ± 0.7*** | 34.4 ± 1.2*** | 34.8 ± 0.5*** | 36.9 ± 0.8 |
| White blood cell differentiations | |||||||
| 2 h after administration | |||||||
| Lymphocyte (%) | 64.3 ± 7.1 | 55.7 ± 10.5 | 48.9 ± 10.2 | 48.6 ± 12.3 | 42.1 ± 6.8* | 53.4 ± 13.6 | 52.6 ± 12.1 |
| Neutrocyte (%) | 29.7 ± 6.1 | 37.0 ± 10.0 | 44.7 ± 9.2 | 42.5 ± 11.2 | 50.3 ± 9.3* | 41.2 ± 13.4 | 40.0 ± 12.8 |
| Eosinocyte (%) | 1.3 ± 1.0 | 2.0 ± 1.4 | 2.6 ± 1.7 | 3.0±1.6 | 2.1 ± 1.5 | 1.3 ± 1.3 | 1.9 ± 1.8 |
| Monocyte (%) | 4.7 ± 2.4 | 5.3 ± 1.7 | 3.9 ± 1.8 | 5.9 ± 3.0 | 5.3 ± 3.9 | 4.1 ± 2.3 | 5.4 ± 1.4 |
| Organ weight | |||||||
| Liver (g) | 2.86 ± 0.30 | 3.15 ± 0.35 | 22.77 ± 0.55 | 0.94 ± 0.30 | 2.92 ± 0.70 | 3.36 ± 0.30 | 3.21 ± 0.25 |
| Kidney (mg) | 2.86 ± 0.30 | 464 ± 41 | 467 ± 85 | 454 ± 52 | 460 ± 43 | 476 ± 34 | 469 ± 27 |
| Spleen (mg) | 182 ± 36 | 154 ± 33 | 474 ± 110*** | 360 ± 104*** | 246 ± 34 | 476 ± 34 | 169 ± 36 |
| Thymus (mg) | 24.7 ± 7.2 | 29.3 ± 8.8 | 37.2 ± 9.3 | 25.8 ± 7.8 | 25.5 ± 6.0 | 26.4 ± 9.0 | 26.5 ± 7.9 |
| Adrenals (mg) | 9.1 ± 1.4 | 9.7 ± 1.5 | 10.3 ± 1.9 | 10.4 ± 1.2 | 9.6 ± 0.5 | 26.4 ± 9.0 | 10.0 ± 1.6 |
| Ovaries (mg) | 19.0 ± 2.6 | 24.7 ± 4.2 | 29.8 ± 2.4 | 5.0 ± 4.4 | 123.6 ± 4.3 | 26.3 ± 2.4 | 26.5 ± 3.2 |
| White blood cell count (x102/μL) | |||||||
| Total | 62.7 ± 13.4 | 48.4 ± 20.9 | 82.1 ± 15.7 | 108.9 ± 37.0** | 76.3 ± 13.5 | 76.3 ± 13.5 | 76.3 ± 13.5 |
| Lymphocyte | 29.2 ± 8.7 | 26.4 ± 10.7 | 218.5 ± 4.6 | 7.9 ± 8.7 | 27.9 ± 3.5 | 23.9 ± 6.6 | 24.5 ± 9.2 |
| Lymphocyte | 28.3 ± 10.3 | 19.8 ± 13.6 | 47.0 ± 8.9* | 48.8 ± 19.6* | 27.9 ± 3.5 | 24.0 ± 5.0 | 18.9 ± 8.2 |
| Eosinocyte | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 0.7 ± 0.6 | 9.9 ± 2.7 | 22.1 ± 13.7*** | 15.3 ± 4.0** | 7.8 ± 3.3 | 0.5 ± 0.5 |
| Eosinocyte | 3.7 ± 2.0 | 0.7 ± 0.6 | 6.6 ± 2.7 | 10.0 ± 6.7* | 5.0 ± 1.8 | 3.4 ± 1.5 | 2.4 ± 2.2 |
Values are the means ± standard deviations for numbers of the dam in each group. The asterisks represent that the values are significantly different from the corresponding control values (*, ** or *** indicating p < 0.05, 0.01 or 0.001, respectively).
The effects of intraperitoneal dose of various MWCNTs on pregnancy status.
| Reproductive parameters | Control | MWCNTs administered (4 mg/kg b.w.) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (CMCNa) | WS | N | M | WL | SD-1 | T | |
| Female gestated | 11 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| Female with>1 live fetus | 11 | 9 | 0*** | 8 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| Implantations/litter | 13.3 ± 2.4 | 14.6 ± 2.2 | 14.6 ± 1.8 | 14.5 ± 1.6 | 13.6 ± 3.3 | 16.8 ± 1.7 | 15.4 ± 2.4 |
| Number of early | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.5 | 14.6 ± 1.8*** | 8.8 ± 6.3*** | 3.6 ± 5.2 | 3.8 ± 2.9 | 0.9 ± 0.8 |
| (% of implantations) | 1 ± 2 | 3 ± 4 | 100 ± 0*** | 59 ± 41*** | 24 ± 35 | 10 ± 9 | 6 ± 5 |
| Female with early dead fetus | 1 | 4 | 9*** | 10*** | 6** | 7** | 6* |
| Number of late | 0.3 ± 0.5 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0 | 0.3 ± 0.6 | 0.1 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.5 | 0.3 ± 0.5 |
| (% of implantations) | 2 ± 4 | 1 ± 3 | 0 | 2 ± 4 | 1 ± 3 | 2 ± 3 | 2 ± 3 |
| Female with late dead fetus | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Live fetus/litter | 12.9 ± 2.5 | 13.9 ± 2.2 | 0*** | 5.5 ± 5.6** | 10.0 ± 5.1 | 12.6 ± 3.9 | 14.2 ± 2.0 |
| 97 ± 4 | 95 ± 4 | 0*** | 39 ± 40*** | 76 ± 35 | 88 ± 6 | 92 ± 7 | |
| Body weight of live fetus (g) | |||||||
| Male | 1.398 ± 0.14 | 1.367 ± 0.137 | — | 1.360 ± 0.146 | 1.320 ± 0.125 | 1.340 ± 0.123 | 1.435 ± 0.058 |
| Female | 1.352 ± 0.111 | 1.316 ± 0.142 | — | 1.228 ± 0.068 | 1.306 ± 0.034 | 1.252 ± 0.140 | 1.376 ± 0.073 |
The percent resorption (early or late dead fetus) and fetal body weight were obtained by averaging the value for each litter. The asterisks represent that the values are significantly different from the corresponding control values (*, ** or *** indicating p < 0.05, 0.01 or 0.001, respectively).
Values are the means ± standard deviations.
‘Early’ was defined as a case showing the implanted sites and amorphous mass, while ‘Late' was defined as a case showing the head and limbs.
Fig. 1Blood cytokine levels in dam 2 h after administration of multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Each column and bar represents the mean ± standard deviation for numbers of the dam in the groups given MWCNTs or the control group. The asterisks represent that the values are significantly different from the corresponding control values (** or *** indicating p < 0.01 or 0.001, respectively).