Literature DB >> 20379079

Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of multi-wall carbon nanotubes in cultured Chinese hamster lung cells in comparison with chrysotile A fibers.

Masumi Asakura1, Toshiaki Sasaki, Toshie Sugiyama, Mitsutoshi Takaya, Shigeki Koda, Kasuke Nagano, Heihachiro Arito, Shoji Fukushima.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The potential applications and industrial production of multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) have raised serious concerns about their safety for human health and the environment. The present study was designed to examine the in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of MWCNT and UICC chrysotile A (chrysotile).
METHODS: Cytotoxicity using both colony formation and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assays and genotoxicity including chromosome aberration, micronucleus induction and hgprt mutagenicity were examined by exposing cultured Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU) cells to MWCNT or chrysotile at different concentrations.
RESULTS: The in vitro cytotoxicity of MWCNT depended on the solvent used for suspension of MWCNT and ultrasonication duration of the MWCNT suspension. A combination of DMSO/culture medium and 3-minute ultrasonication resulted in a well-dispersed medium with dispersion and isolation of agglomerated MWCNT by ultrasonication which manifested the highest cytotoxicity. The cytotoxicity was more potent for chrysotile than MWCNT. The genotoxicity of MWCNT was characterized by the formation of polyploidy without structural chromosome aberration, and an increased number of bi- and multi-nucleated cells without micronucleus induction, as well as negative hgprt mutagenicity. Chrysotile exhibited essentially the same genotoxicity as MWCNT, except for marginal but significant induction of micronuclei. MWCNT and chrysotile were incompletely internalized in the cells and localized in the cytoplasm.
CONCLUSIONS: MWCNT and chrysotile were cytotoxic and genotoxic in Chinese hamster lung cells, but might interact indirectly with DNA. The results suggest that both test substances interfere physically with biological processes during cytokinesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20379079     DOI: 10.1539/joh.l9150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Health        ISSN: 1341-9145            Impact factor:   2.708


  27 in total

1.  Cell permeability, migration, and reactive oxygen species induced by multiwalled carbon nanotubes in human microvascular endothelial cells.

Authors:  M Pacurari; Y Qian; W Fu; D Schwegler-Berry; M Ding; V Castranova; N L Guo
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2012

2.  Long-term effects of carbon containing engineered nanomaterials and asbestos in the lung: one year postexposure comparisons.

Authors:  Anna A Shvedova; Naveena Yanamala; Elena R Kisin; Alexey V Tkach; Ashley R Murray; Ann Hubbs; Madalina M Chirila; Phouthone Keohavong; Lyudmila P Sycheva; Valerian E Kagan; Vincent Castranova
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.464

3.  Genotoxicity of carbon nanofibers: are they potentially more or less dangerous than carbon nanotubes or asbestos?

Authors:  E R Kisin; A R Murray; L Sargent; D Lowry; M Chirila; K J Siegrist; D Schwegler-Berry; S Leonard; V Castranova; B Fadeel; V E Kagan; A A Shvedova
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  Safe clinical use of carbon nanotubes as innovative biomaterials.

Authors:  Naoto Saito; Hisao Haniu; Yuki Usui; Kaoru Aoki; Kazuo Hara; Seiji Takanashi; Masayuki Shimizu; Nobuyo Narita; Masanori Okamoto; Shinsuke Kobayashi; Hiroki Nomura; Hiroyuki Kato; Naoyuki Nishimura; Seiichi Taruta; Morinobu Endo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 5.  Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Peter Møller; Yasuo Morimoto; Norihiro Kobayashi; Kent E Pinkerton; Linda M Sargent; Roel C H Vermeulen; Bice Fubini; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  Drosophila as a Suitable In Vivo Model in the Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Eşref Demir; Fatma Turna Demir; Ricard Marcos
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Hazard Assessment of Benchmark Metal-Based Nanomaterials Through a Set of In Vitro Genotoxicity Assays.

Authors:  Maria Dušinská; Maria João Silva; Nádia Vital; Mariana Pinhão; Naouale El Yamani; Elise Rundén-Pran; Henriqueta Louro
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 8.  Cellular targets and mechanisms in the cytotoxic action of non-biodegradable engineered nanoparticles.

Authors:  Eleonore Fröhlich
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Carboxylated short single-walled carbon nanotubes but not plain and multi-walled short carbon nanotubes show in vitro genotoxicity.

Authors:  Maria Mrakovcic; Claudia Meindl; Gerd Leitinger; Eva Roblegg; Eleonore Fröhlich
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Two-week Toxicity of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes by Whole-body Inhalation Exposure in Rats.

Authors:  Yumi Umeda; Tatsuya Kasai; Misae Saito; Hitomi Kondo; Tadao Toya; Shigetoshi Aiso; Hirokazu Okuda; Tomoshi Nishizawa; Shoji Fukushima
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.